Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: Dolorous Jason on December 10, 2012, 07:59:47 AMQuote from: chace1986 on December 10, 2012, 07:43:19 AMQuote from: Fire Mark Dummynik on December 10, 2012, 07:28:24 AMQuote from: chace1986 on December 09, 2012, 09:49:41 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:13:48 PMQuote from: Dolorous Jason on December 09, 2012, 08:10:12 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:05:58 PMDJ, Are you another who thinks those players only could be obtained if the bucs drafted Barron? COULD they have ? ....sure.... We also COULD have obtained Tom Brady.....can you prove it , and are the odds as good? The answer the is no. There's only 1 way we know it happens for sure and for an acceptable price. To assume it all plays out exactly the same if we stay at #5 is ridiculous.Nope - Brady would break the cap and we aren't having that for sure. But during the draft the bucs have shown the ability and willingness to move other picks to get where they want to be. There is no real reason to think the past draft would have not been able to keep the 5th overall, and still obtain Martin and David. It would have been a matter of price and willingness.Logic and critical thinking don't get past DJs filter. Claiborne could have a HOF career and Doloris would still talk about his wonderlic score.SO , are you claiming Claiborne has had a great season ?? Show me the logic and critical thinking skills you've used to deduce this , because it can't be from the amount of yards and TD's he's allowed against him , nor from his lack of stupid penalties. Nope. Never claimed that he was having a great season. It was more of a prediction of how you would react to Claiborne's success. Claiborne has had a better season than Barron. Even though Claiborne might have been just above average for the year, its still better than the crap we get from Barron on a weekly basis.Doesn't mean a damn thing. Time will tell who the better player is , and it's way too early to judge. I still believe Barron will be a beast in the coming years.The point is : these people who keep bringing up Claiborne at every turn , as if the picking of him would have fixed all our coverage issues , obviously aren't even watching Cowboy games. The guy hasn't exactly been Darelle Reavis. Eric Wright would probably be a better comparison , and we have one of those. Stop bringing his dumb ass up already....Agree... what was it that player stated a couple of weeks about RJ 3 ? "He is not one of us" paraphrased..... Claiborne is a dumb ass and some want to celebrate it. Sorry, I don't praise those that glorify the ignorant and stupid. Oh and it is rather obvious the Bucs agree with our thoughts on Claiborne by moving down. While it may be early to tell but last year's Buc draft was the best I have seen. The first (3) picks were brilliant by the organization.
Quote from: chace1986 on December 10, 2012, 07:43:19 AMQuote from: Fire Mark Dummynik on December 10, 2012, 07:28:24 AMQuote from: chace1986 on December 09, 2012, 09:49:41 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:13:48 PMQuote from: Dolorous Jason on December 09, 2012, 08:10:12 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:05:58 PMDJ, Are you another who thinks those players only could be obtained if the bucs drafted Barron? COULD they have ? ....sure.... We also COULD have obtained Tom Brady.....can you prove it , and are the odds as good? The answer the is no. There's only 1 way we know it happens for sure and for an acceptable price. To assume it all plays out exactly the same if we stay at #5 is ridiculous.Nope - Brady would break the cap and we aren't having that for sure. But during the draft the bucs have shown the ability and willingness to move other picks to get where they want to be. There is no real reason to think the past draft would have not been able to keep the 5th overall, and still obtain Martin and David. It would have been a matter of price and willingness.Logic and critical thinking don't get past DJs filter. Claiborne could have a HOF career and Doloris would still talk about his wonderlic score.SO , are you claiming Claiborne has had a great season ?? Show me the logic and critical thinking skills you've used to deduce this , because it can't be from the amount of yards and TD's he's allowed against him , nor from his lack of stupid penalties. Nope. Never claimed that he was having a great season. It was more of a prediction of how you would react to Claiborne's success. Claiborne has had a better season than Barron. Even though Claiborne might have been just above average for the year, its still better than the crap we get from Barron on a weekly basis.Doesn't mean a damn thing. Time will tell who the better player is , and it's way too early to judge. I still believe Barron will be a beast in the coming years.The point is : these people who keep bringing up Claiborne at every turn , as if the picking of him would have fixed all our coverage issues , obviously aren't even watching Cowboy games. The guy hasn't exactly been Darelle Reavis. Eric Wright would probably be a better comparison , and we have one of those. Stop bringing his dumb ass up already....
Quote from: Fire Mark Dummynik on December 10, 2012, 07:28:24 AMQuote from: chace1986 on December 09, 2012, 09:49:41 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:13:48 PMQuote from: Dolorous Jason on December 09, 2012, 08:10:12 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:05:58 PMDJ, Are you another who thinks those players only could be obtained if the bucs drafted Barron? COULD they have ? ....sure.... We also COULD have obtained Tom Brady.....can you prove it , and are the odds as good? The answer the is no. There's only 1 way we know it happens for sure and for an acceptable price. To assume it all plays out exactly the same if we stay at #5 is ridiculous.Nope - Brady would break the cap and we aren't having that for sure. But during the draft the bucs have shown the ability and willingness to move other picks to get where they want to be. There is no real reason to think the past draft would have not been able to keep the 5th overall, and still obtain Martin and David. It would have been a matter of price and willingness.Logic and critical thinking don't get past DJs filter. Claiborne could have a HOF career and Doloris would still talk about his wonderlic score.SO , are you claiming Claiborne has had a great season ?? Show me the logic and critical thinking skills you've used to deduce this , because it can't be from the amount of yards and TD's he's allowed against him , nor from his lack of stupid penalties. Nope. Never claimed that he was having a great season. It was more of a prediction of how you would react to Claiborne's success. Claiborne has had a better season than Barron. Even though Claiborne might have been just above average for the year, its still better than the crap we get from Barron on a weekly basis.
Quote from: chace1986 on December 09, 2012, 09:49:41 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:13:48 PMQuote from: Dolorous Jason on December 09, 2012, 08:10:12 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:05:58 PMDJ, Are you another who thinks those players only could be obtained if the bucs drafted Barron? COULD they have ? ....sure.... We also COULD have obtained Tom Brady.....can you prove it , and are the odds as good? The answer the is no. There's only 1 way we know it happens for sure and for an acceptable price. To assume it all plays out exactly the same if we stay at #5 is ridiculous.Nope - Brady would break the cap and we aren't having that for sure. But during the draft the bucs have shown the ability and willingness to move other picks to get where they want to be. There is no real reason to think the past draft would have not been able to keep the 5th overall, and still obtain Martin and David. It would have been a matter of price and willingness.Logic and critical thinking don't get past DJs filter. Claiborne could have a HOF career and Doloris would still talk about his wonderlic score.SO , are you claiming Claiborne has had a great season ?? Show me the logic and critical thinking skills you've used to deduce this , because it can't be from the amount of yards and TD's he's allowed against him , nor from his lack of stupid penalties.
Quote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:13:48 PMQuote from: Dolorous Jason on December 09, 2012, 08:10:12 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:05:58 PMDJ, Are you another who thinks those players only could be obtained if the bucs drafted Barron? COULD they have ? ....sure.... We also COULD have obtained Tom Brady.....can you prove it , and are the odds as good? The answer the is no. There's only 1 way we know it happens for sure and for an acceptable price. To assume it all plays out exactly the same if we stay at #5 is ridiculous.Nope - Brady would break the cap and we aren't having that for sure. But during the draft the bucs have shown the ability and willingness to move other picks to get where they want to be. There is no real reason to think the past draft would have not been able to keep the 5th overall, and still obtain Martin and David. It would have been a matter of price and willingness.Logic and critical thinking don't get past DJs filter. Claiborne could have a HOF career and Doloris would still talk about his wonderlic score.
Quote from: Dolorous Jason on December 09, 2012, 08:10:12 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:05:58 PMDJ, Are you another who thinks those players only could be obtained if the bucs drafted Barron? COULD they have ? ....sure.... We also COULD have obtained Tom Brady.....can you prove it , and are the odds as good? The answer the is no. There's only 1 way we know it happens for sure and for an acceptable price. To assume it all plays out exactly the same if we stay at #5 is ridiculous.Nope - Brady would break the cap and we aren't having that for sure. But during the draft the bucs have shown the ability and willingness to move other picks to get where they want to be. There is no real reason to think the past draft would have not been able to keep the 5th overall, and still obtain Martin and David. It would have been a matter of price and willingness.
Quote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:05:58 PMDJ, Are you another who thinks those players only could be obtained if the bucs drafted Barron? COULD they have ? ....sure.... We also COULD have obtained Tom Brady.....can you prove it , and are the odds as good? The answer the is no. There's only 1 way we know it happens for sure and for an acceptable price. To assume it all plays out exactly the same if we stay at #5 is ridiculous.
DJ, Are you another who thinks those players only could be obtained if the bucs drafted Barron?
Claiborne was the slam dunk pick IMO. Barron is solid but I thought he was poor value where we took him.
Claiborne has not been great. He's been good at time, bad at other times....never great.
Quote from: JDouble on December 30, 2012, 10:05:53 AMClaiborne has not been great. He's been good at time, bad at other times....never great.Better than Barron.
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.
The list of rookies that were better than Barron this year is a long one.
Quote from: chace1986 on December 31, 2012, 10:07:40 AMThe list of rookies that were better than Barron this year is a long one.this is true. but will they be better next year? for the next ten? i also paid attention to mcmillian for the packers a bit yesterday. i know he's been compared as a rookie saftey, but he's not even a starter.i will admit the last play by barron made me feel much better about him going into the offseason.
LOL this even remains a question. Barron is a guy, just a guy back there. He made one play in the passing game yesterday in a game the falcons only half cared about. Yeah baby. This is what happens when you try and win the run game and not the NFL game.