Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
From the article you just posted:"Elmendorf wrote that newly available research prompted CBO to update "its analysis of the effects of tort reform." The agency's conclusion: A package of reforms that included a $250,000 cap on damages for pain and suffering and a $500,000 cap on punitive damages "would reduce total national health care spending by about 0.5 percent."Would reduce total national healthcare spending by what, Vinny Peanuts? Does that say 0.5%, or doesn't it? Clueless doesn't even begin to describe you.
Quote from: CBWx2 on November 21, 2012, 07:36:32 PMFrom the article you just posted:"Elmendorf wrote that newly available research prompted CBO to update "its analysis of the effects of tort reform." The agency's conclusion: A package of reforms that included a $250,000 cap on damages for pain and suffering and a $500,000 cap on punitive damages "would reduce total national health care spending by about 0.5 percent."Would reduce total national healthcare spending by what, Vinny Peanuts? Does that say 0.5%, or doesn't it? Clueless doesn't even begin to describe you.you're so angry its funny. you're mad because I have pointed out (again) that you are a fraud, so now youre trying so hard . . calling me "vinny peanuts" and "clueless." It's okay Ginger, I will fill you in on a little secret just so you don't stay mad. Are you paying attention? Here's the secret:THEY KNOW . . .ALL OF THEM . . . . THEY ALREADY KNOW
Quote from: JavaRay on November 15, 2012, 11:26:26 PMIsn't this an ironic picture?mwk
Quote from: VinBucFan on November 21, 2012, 07:40:08 PMQuote from: CBWx2 on November 21, 2012, 07:36:32 PMFrom the article you just posted:"Elmendorf wrote that newly available research prompted CBO to update "its analysis of the effects of tort reform." The agency's conclusion: A package of reforms that included a $250,000 cap on damages for pain and suffering and a $500,000 cap on punitive damages "would reduce total national health care spending by about 0.5 percent."Would reduce total national healthcare spending by what, Vinny Peanuts? Does that say 0.5%, or doesn't it? Clueless doesn't even begin to describe you.you're so angry its funny. you're mad because I have pointed out (again) that you are a fraud, so now youre trying so hard . . calling me "vinny peanuts" and "clueless." It's okay Ginger, I will fill you in on a little secret just so you don't stay mad. Are you paying attention? Here's the secret:THEY KNOW . . .ALL OF THEM . . . . THEY ALREADY KNOW "Elmendorf wrote that newly available research prompted CBO to update "its analysis of the effects of tort reform." The agency's conclusion: A package of reforms that included a $250,000 cap on damages for pain and suffering and a $500,000 cap on punitive damages "would reduce total national health care spending by about 0.5 percent."I was wrong. I overestimated the impact of tort reform by a full percentage point. Got any other links you want to post, Vinny Peanuts? Your help in making my points for me is proving to be pretty valuable.
I just realized that this thread says "Boycott Wal Mart". I never shop there anyway. So I guess I already boycott it.
Quote from: CBWx2 on November 21, 2012, 08:16:12 PMQuote from: VinBucFan on November 21, 2012, 07:40:08 PMQuote from: CBWx2 on November 21, 2012, 07:36:32 PMFrom the article you just posted:"Elmendorf wrote that newly available research prompted CBO to update "its analysis of the effects of tort reform." The agency's conclusion: A package of reforms that included a $250,000 cap on damages for pain and suffering and a $500,000 cap on punitive damages "would reduce total national health care spending by about 0.5 percent."Would reduce total national healthcare spending by what, Vinny Peanuts? Does that say 0.5%, or doesn't it? Clueless doesn't even begin to describe you.you're so angry its funny. you're mad because I have pointed out (again) that you are a fraud, so now youre trying so hard . . calling me "vinny peanuts" and "clueless." It's okay Ginger, I will fill you in on a little secret just so you don't stay mad. Are you paying attention? Here's the secret:THEY KNOW . . .ALL OF THEM . . . . THEY ALREADY KNOW "Elmendorf wrote that newly available research prompted CBO to update "its analysis of the effects of tort reform." The agency's conclusion: A package of reforms that included a $250,000 cap on damages for pain and suffering and a $500,000 cap on punitive damages "would reduce total national health care spending by about 0.5 percent."I was wrong. I overestimated the impact of tort reform by a full percentage point. Got any other links you want to post, Vinny Peanuts? Your help in making my points for me is proving to be pretty valuable.
Quote from: JavaRay on November 22, 2012, 06:38:34 AMI just realized that this thread says "Boycott Wal Mart". I never shop there anyway. So I guess I already boycott it.Me either. They don't even have one in the city that I live in.
Illuminator is a good poster. He sticks to his guns and makes good points. Some don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'t like that.
Bought a 60" Vizio LED for my girl, $688.
Wally World was the busiest I've ever seen it last night. Couldn't even get into the parking lot, had to park across the street at PayLess. Bought a 60" Vizio LED for my girl, $688.