Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: TBayXXXVII on November 30, 2012, 11:34:09 AMQuote from: BucBalla85 on November 30, 2012, 11:29:02 AM2010 was a great season by Freeman. I dont care who he was playing against. This is the nfl. There are no easy games at this level. I know you dont like Freeman but 2010 was a very good season for him. 25tds and 6 int is no joke for a guy in his second season, first as a starter.We differ on that. In the past, that has been true, but over the last 5 years... it's not. Since the rule changes the NFL has made, there are definitely the "Haves" and "Have Nots". If you "Have" good QB play, you win. If you "Have Not" good QB play, you lose.Brady and Peyton combined have 1 single ring in the last 8 years. Ryan and Brees pretty much played the same shedule as Freeman in 2010, still #5 had the best QBR of the 3. When Freeman won in big fashion @SEA, Brees saw on of the biggest upsets in PO history a few weeks later.If Freeman is not a good QB, why he is able to win games, more than the 'future HOFer' M Stafford? Somewhere you logic fails. Why not compare Freeman to Eli, Eli has stretches of suckkiness aswell, even this season. If you are so concerned about long time, why overvalue those 2 hot streaks in the POs, just once he made POs without a few lucky breaks/tie breakers. Why is Rivers unable to get the #1 offense and defense to the POs?
Quote from: BucBalla85 on November 30, 2012, 11:29:02 AM2010 was a great season by Freeman. I dont care who he was playing against. This is the nfl. There are no easy games at this level. I know you dont like Freeman but 2010 was a very good season for him. 25tds and 6 int is no joke for a guy in his second season, first as a starter.We differ on that. In the past, that has been true, but over the last 5 years... it's not. Since the rule changes the NFL has made, there are definitely the "Haves" and "Have Nots". If you "Have" good QB play, you win. If you "Have Not" good QB play, you lose.
2010 was a great season by Freeman. I dont care who he was playing against. This is the nfl. There are no easy games at this level. I know you dont like Freeman but 2010 was a very good season for him. 25tds and 6 int is no joke for a guy in his second season, first as a starter.
Quote from: QaZ on November 30, 2012, 12:06:08 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on November 30, 2012, 11:34:09 AMQuote from: BucBalla85 on November 30, 2012, 11:29:02 AM2010 was a great season by Freeman. I dont care who he was playing against. This is the nfl. There are no easy games at this level. I know you dont like Freeman but 2010 was a very good season for him. 25tds and 6 int is no joke for a guy in his second season, first as a starter.We differ on that. In the past, that has been true, but over the last 5 years... it's not. Since the rule changes the NFL has made, there are definitely the "Haves" and "Have Nots". If you "Have" good QB play, you win. If you "Have Not" good QB play, you lose.Brady and Peyton combined have 1 single ring in the last 8 years. Ryan and Brees pretty much played the same shedule as Freeman in 2010, still #5 had the best QBR of the 3. When Freeman won in big fashion @SEA, Brees saw on of the biggest upsets in PO history a few weeks later.If Freeman is not a good QB, why he is able to win games, more than the 'future HOFer' M Stafford? Somewhere you logic fails. Why not compare Freeman to Eli, Eli has stretches of suckkiness aswell, even this season. If you are so concerned about long time, why overvalue those 2 hot streaks in the POs, just once he made POs without a few lucky breaks/tie breakers. Why is Rivers unable to get the #1 offense and defense to the POs?"Brady and Peyton combined have 1 single ring in the last 8 years". No idea what your point is, but that's for the common knowledge.In 2010, Brees and Ryan went to the playoffs... Freeman didn't. Nuf said.Freeman isn't a bad QB... he isn't a good QB, he's right in the middle I think. There are about 12-15 QB's I'd take over him... about 12-15 I choose him over. That makes him middle of the road. As a starter he's 23-28, slightly less than average... take out the rookie season and he's 20-22. That again, make him middle of the road. He's been consistently able to beat the bad teams and has very few (4 to be exact... 3 of which are in division), wins against good teams. Let's say the Bucs win in Atlanta at the end of the season. If Minnesota ends up with a winning record, Josh Freeman will have approximately 26 wins... 20 of them against teams with a losing record. Not counting this season, he's 5-20 against teams with a .500 or better. At some point you have to have long term success against the better teams.Who claim's that Stafford is a future hall of famer? I think he's good... not yet great. He may be, he may not be. At this point in time, I'd be ok with him as my QB for the next 5 years. I wouldn't be Aaron Rodgers comfortable, but I'd be ok.Eli steps up in big games and has done so over and over. Freeman has never had that opportunity. It's unfair to hold Freeman up to that standard, so I don't. If you want to, then this is the only place you can peddle that crap. Try talking to a non-Bucs fan and throw some crap out there that Freeman is as good as Eli and watch how everyone on the planet laughs at you.As far as Rivers goes, in 2010... I blame Norv Turner. He's just bad. Rivers' abilities is the only reason that team has won games in the past and why Turner still has a job. I think both he and AJ Smith get fired this offseason.
Quote from: TBayXXXVII on November 30, 2012, 11:34:09 AMQuote from: BucBalla85 on November 30, 2012, 11:29:02 AM2010 was a great season by Freeman. I dont care who he was playing against. This is the nfl. There are no easy games at this level. I know you dont like Freeman but 2010 was a very good season for him. 25tds and 6 int is no joke for a guy in his second season, first as a starter.We differ on that. In the past, that has been true, but over the last 5 years... it's not. Since the rule changes the NFL has made, there are definitely the "Haves" and "Have Nots". If you "Have" good QB play, you win. If you "Have Not" good QB play, you lose.So your saying Alex Smith is the reason they're winning in San Francisco?He just got benched for a rookie. That can't be right. Alex Smith lead the 49ers to a 6-2 record. Those wins were all on him, he did it, nothing else REALLY matters but the QB. A win is because the QB won it, a loss is because the QB lost it, right? You can't really believe that?
So Rivers has bad coaching as an excuse? Freeman, despite Raheem the great, never was able to shine? Interesting.Eli is 31 years old, Freeman is 24. After the 2010 season, Eli and Coughlin were on a verge of getting the boot. Freeman has to be where Eli is NOW. Interesting.Stafford on your list was in the Brady/Peyton category, now he just 'may be, may be not'. Interesting.So, the elite QBs never pad their stats vs bad teams? They just play the good teams? Espcially at the age of 24? Why does Peyton have more losses in the PO than wins?When Ryan and Brees made the PO in 2010, it was their superior QB play that got them there, or was it the even easier shedule and better supporting cast?
Rivers has made it to the playoffs multiple times despite bad coaching... Freeman hasn't made it once. Issue closed. Maybe when (hopefully... not if), Freeman makes the playoffs in multiple seeasons, it won't be an issue.Eli was NEVER on the verge of getting the boot in 2010... neither was Coughlin, that was 2007 where Coughlin almost got fired, but Eli wasn't in any danger that year either.Yes, Stafford is on my list with Brady and Peyton as guys who I think are franchise QB's. Yes, it's possible that Stafford spits the bit and turns out not to be. Right now I believe he's shown enough to be considered a franchise QB, that's why I put him in that category... it doesn't mean that the list is gospel and carve it in stone as perfect.Since the NFL has been a more passing friendly league (2006), Peyton is 6-4... winning one SB, and losing the other to Drew Brees. He also lost twice to Phillip Rivers. The other loss was to the Jets when they had a top 3 defense.
You were simply too smart for me.
poor choice of plays to illustrate a point IMO. Not every throw is going to be on the money. Hell, even Ryan sailed a couple that day with wide open targets. Saw brees do it thursday too. Even upper echelon guys have throws like this almost every game. Not saying Freeman is there or the most accurate QB, just stating you can easily pull a couple plays from any game and make the same argument against any QB.Its called cherry picking.
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.
Clearly Josh Freeman is the best QB in the NFCS.