Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
That wasn't even my point. My point is that a vast majority of the posters here apparently have an unbelievably skewed understanding of QB value in the NFL along with the free agent market.
Quote from: SunnyD on December 10, 2012, 12:54:41 AMThat wasn't even my point. My point is that a vast majority of the posters here apparently have an unbelievably skewed understanding of QB value in the NFL along with the free agent market.Agree. a few teams like Buffalo, KC, Miami, even the Jets would love to have him and be willing to shell out the cash too.
Quote from: The Anti-Java on December 10, 2012, 12:58:20 AMQuote from: SunnyD on December 10, 2012, 12:54:41 AMThat wasn't even my point. My point is that a vast majority of the posters here apparently have an unbelievably skewed understanding of QB value in the NFL along with the free agent market.Agree. a few teams like Buffalo, KC, Miami, even the Jets would love to have him and be willing to shell out the cash too.I don't agree with Miami (because of Tannehill). Completely agree on all other teams though. The Jets would pick up Freeman in a gold plated helicopter and give him a key to the city.
Jay Cutler was a phenomenal example. Look at how much coin that dude got and then look at how unbelievably average he is. Re-sign Freeman for 1 year 3.5 million? LOL
Quote from: SunnyD on December 10, 2012, 12:54:41 AMThat wasn't even my point. My point is that a vast majority of the posters here apparently have an unbelievably skewed understanding of QB value in the NFL along with the free agent market.I don't know if this is true anymore. We'll have to see how things play out in the coming years. It's a passer driven league these days. I don't think teams are going to shell out big bucks for a QB they don't have confidence can run their offense. Like I said, if there's a team out there that is dumb enough to pay Freeman $10M per year for what he's done over the last 3.5 seasons, I hope it's not the Bucs. Arizona and Seattle are examples I'd point to. While they paid money for QB's, they were team friendly deals and the QB's got very short leashes. If Freeman hits the FA market... I think that's the likely path for him.
Quote from: TBayXXXVII on December 09, 2012, 11:30:00 PMQuote from: The Anti-Java on December 09, 2012, 11:26:01 PMThe Bucs are onboard with Freeman, doesn't matter what any of us fans think.We don't know that to be true. Freeman was Morris' guy... not Dominik's and not Schiano's. The fact that Schiano hasn't really ever given Freeman a glowing endorsement tells me that he's not convinced. The fact that Dominik hasn't made mention about an extension more or less backs that up as well as it says that Dominik isn't sold on Freeman either.And I would counter that they have not brought in one bit of competition at the QB position, showing they are all in on Free.
Quote from: The Anti-Java on December 09, 2012, 11:26:01 PMThe Bucs are onboard with Freeman, doesn't matter what any of us fans think.We don't know that to be true. Freeman was Morris' guy... not Dominik's and not Schiano's. The fact that Schiano hasn't really ever given Freeman a glowing endorsement tells me that he's not convinced. The fact that Dominik hasn't made mention about an extension more or less backs that up as well as it says that Dominik isn't sold on Freeman either.
The Bucs are onboard with Freeman, doesn't matter what any of us fans think.
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.