Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 07:43:05 PMQuote from: Hate on December 09, 2012, 07:37:33 PMDave, i don't have that answer but i'm pretty confident that we can find mediocre anywhere.Skip - bringing in mediocre to replace mediocre isn't moving forward. IF THE PRICE IS RIGHT (something like Jason Campbell's contract) Freeman should be re-signed. And he isn't the only one on the team that is mediocre. And we should remain curious to see how he might function with the starting O line in place. The current group of backups can't keep the pocket clean in front of Freeman - and most qbs stink when faced with that condition. I AM NOT SAYING Freeman is the answer - just that there is still information needed to decide what Freeman's final evaluation should be. In the interim - if the bucs can extend him for a fair price - that is smart.On what planet should Freeman accept Jason Campbell money after he finishes the season with 3,900 yards (team record), 30 TD's (team record) and 10 INT's? Campbell can't dream about that kind of production.
Quote from: Hate on December 09, 2012, 07:37:33 PMDave, i don't have that answer but i'm pretty confident that we can find mediocre anywhere.Skip - bringing in mediocre to replace mediocre isn't moving forward. IF THE PRICE IS RIGHT (something like Jason Campbell's contract) Freeman should be re-signed. And he isn't the only one on the team that is mediocre. And we should remain curious to see how he might function with the starting O line in place. The current group of backups can't keep the pocket clean in front of Freeman - and most qbs stink when faced with that condition. I AM NOT SAYING Freeman is the answer - just that there is still information needed to decide what Freeman's final evaluation should be. In the interim - if the bucs can extend him for a fair price - that is smart.
Dave, i don't have that answer but i'm pretty confident that we can find mediocre anywhere.
Quote from: Feel Real Good on December 09, 2012, 07:54:30 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 07:43:05 PMQuote from: Hate on December 09, 2012, 07:37:33 PMDave, i don't have that answer but i'm pretty confident that we can find mediocre anywhere.Skip - bringing in mediocre to replace mediocre isn't moving forward. IF THE PRICE IS RIGHT (something like Jason Campbell's contract) Freeman should be re-signed. And he isn't the only one on the team that is mediocre. And we should remain curious to see how he might function with the starting O line in place. The current group of backups can't keep the pocket clean in front of Freeman - and most qbs stink when faced with that condition. I AM NOT SAYING Freeman is the answer - just that there is still information needed to decide what Freeman's final evaluation should be. In the interim - if the bucs can extend him for a fair price - that is smart.On what planet should Freeman accept Jason Campbell money after he finishes the season with 3,900 yards (team record), 30 TD's (team record) and 10 INT's? Campbell can't dream about that kind of production.Similar money for similar outcomes if he wants the extension FRG. If he doesn't want it that is his choice. As the talk has evolved I have noted something in the 5 million a year range is affordable and allows the bucs to keep shopping should they conclude Freeman isn't going to be the guy.
FRG is the most logical poster on this board. You guys just don\'t like where the logical conclusions take you.
You guys are smoking crack if you think Freeman is getting anything less than $10 million per year from someone? Chicago traded two 1st round picks for Jay Cutler after he went 25/18 his last season in Denver. They signed him to a 5-year $50 million contract. Freeman has already had two seasons better than that.
Freeman's TD and INT stats this season are comparable to Tom Brady and Aaron Rogers and Matt Ryan and better that some other "franchise" QBs. It's just that we all see the uneven game performance (reflected in a low completion percentage)
Bringing in mediocre to replace mediocre is moving forward if you're not committing to mediocre long term. You give Freeman a long-term contract, and you're committing to mediocre long-term.
Quote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:04:30 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 09, 2012, 07:54:30 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 07:43:05 PMQuote from: Hate on December 09, 2012, 07:37:33 PMDave, i don't have that answer but i'm pretty confident that we can find mediocre anywhere.Skip - bringing in mediocre to replace mediocre isn't moving forward. IF THE PRICE IS RIGHT (something like Jason Campbell's contract) Freeman should be re-signed. And he isn't the only one on the team that is mediocre. And we should remain curious to see how he might function with the starting O line in place. The current group of backups can't keep the pocket clean in front of Freeman - and most qbs stink when faced with that condition. I AM NOT SAYING Freeman is the answer - just that there is still information needed to decide what Freeman's final evaluation should be. In the interim - if the bucs can extend him for a fair price - that is smart.On what planet should Freeman accept Jason Campbell money after he finishes the season with 3,900 yards (team record), 30 TD's (team record) and 10 INT's? Campbell can't dream about that kind of production.Similar money for similar outcomes if he wants the extension FRG. If he doesn't want it that is his choice. As the talk has evolved I have noted something in the 5 million a year range is affordable and allows the bucs to keep shopping should they conclude Freeman isn't going to be the guy. I thought you weren't with us anymore, Hugh.
Quote from: VinBucFan on December 09, 2012, 08:02:53 PMFreeman's TD and INT stats this season are comparable to Tom Brady and Aaron Rogers and Matt Ryan and better that some other "franchise" QBs. It's just that we all see the uneven game performance (reflected in a low completion percentage)But you can't just look at TD/INT numbers. As you said, his completion percentage isn't just bad, it's worse than Kevin Kolb. Out of 34 qualifying QBs, he's 31st.
Quote from: Feel Real Good on December 09, 2012, 08:08:46 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:04:30 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 09, 2012, 07:54:30 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 07:43:05 PMQuote from: Hate on December 09, 2012, 07:37:33 PMDave, i don't have that answer but i'm pretty confident that we can find mediocre anywhere.Skip - bringing in mediocre to replace mediocre isn't moving forward. IF THE PRICE IS RIGHT (something like Jason Campbell's contract) Freeman should be re-signed. And he isn't the only one on the team that is mediocre. And we should remain curious to see how he might function with the starting O line in place. The current group of backups can't keep the pocket clean in front of Freeman - and most qbs stink when faced with that condition. I AM NOT SAYING Freeman is the answer - just that there is still information needed to decide what Freeman's final evaluation should be. In the interim - if the bucs can extend him for a fair price - that is smart.On what planet should Freeman accept Jason Campbell money after he finishes the season with 3,900 yards (team record), 30 TD's (team record) and 10 INT's? Campbell can't dream about that kind of production.Similar money for similar outcomes if he wants the extension FRG. If he doesn't want it that is his choice. As the talk has evolved I have noted something in the 5 million a year range is affordable and allows the bucs to keep shopping should they conclude Freeman isn't going to be the guy. I thought you weren't with us anymore, Hugh. LOL - no - I just don't see Freeman as the starter 2-3 years from now - so the 10 mill would be out of the question for me.
Quote from: VinBucFan on December 09, 2012, 08:02:53 PMFreeman's TD and INT stats this season are comparable to Tom Brady and Aaron Rogers and Matt Ryan and better that some other "franchise" QBs. It's just that we all see the uneven game performance (reflected in a low completion percentage)Was beginning to think you had been bannned, glad to see you haven't. Josh can hit a hot streak and win games, my problem is he is unreliable. You can't count on him to step up when it counts.
Quote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:10:28 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 09, 2012, 08:08:46 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:04:30 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 09, 2012, 07:54:30 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 07:43:05 PMQuote from: Hate on December 09, 2012, 07:37:33 PMDave, i don't have that answer but i'm pretty confident that we can find mediocre anywhere.Skip - bringing in mediocre to replace mediocre isn't moving forward. IF THE PRICE IS RIGHT (something like Jason Campbell's contract) Freeman should be re-signed. And he isn't the only one on the team that is mediocre. And we should remain curious to see how he might function with the starting O line in place. The current group of backups can't keep the pocket clean in front of Freeman - and most qbs stink when faced with that condition. I AM NOT SAYING Freeman is the answer - just that there is still information needed to decide what Freeman's final evaluation should be. In the interim - if the bucs can extend him for a fair price - that is smart.On what planet should Freeman accept Jason Campbell money after he finishes the season with 3,900 yards (team record), 30 TD's (team record) and 10 INT's? Campbell can't dream about that kind of production.Similar money for similar outcomes if he wants the extension FRG. If he doesn't want it that is his choice. As the talk has evolved I have noted something in the 5 million a year range is affordable and allows the bucs to keep shopping should they conclude Freeman isn't going to be the guy. I thought you weren't with us anymore, Hugh. LOL - no - I just don't see Freeman as the starter 2-3 years from now - so the 10 mill would be out of the question for me. So what is the historical precedence for a 24-year-old QB with a career 76/54 not being a starting QB 2-3 years later barring significant injury/incarceration?