Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Freeman is not a hall of fame QB. That should kill any and all comparisons to Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees, Tom Brady, and Peyton Manning.
Quote from: Morgan on December 10, 2012, 08:31:06 AMQuote from: youngone on December 10, 2012, 08:28:40 AMQuote from: CBWx2 on December 10, 2012, 07:52:09 AMQB's with more TD's than Freeman: Drew Brees, Peyton Manning, Aaron Rodgers. QB's with less INT's than Freeman (400+ attempts) : Tom BradyThis thread is nothing but further proof of what a complete joke of a fanbase this team has.Thisthose QBs that you're comparing Freeman to would have sliced and diced the Eagles defense. Bucs get 21 points against one of the league's worst teams, and 7 of them were gifted by a botched punt.Again, why do you judge him on a game by game basis? Brady lost to the Cardinals in Foxboro. Ridiculous.
Quote from: youngone on December 10, 2012, 08:28:40 AMQuote from: CBWx2 on December 10, 2012, 07:52:09 AMQB's with more TD's than Freeman: Drew Brees, Peyton Manning, Aaron Rodgers. QB's with less INT's than Freeman (400+ attempts) : Tom BradyThis thread is nothing but further proof of what a complete joke of a fanbase this team has.Thisthose QBs that you're comparing Freeman to would have sliced and diced the Eagles defense. Bucs get 21 points against one of the league's worst teams, and 7 of them were gifted by a botched punt.
Quote from: CBWx2 on December 10, 2012, 07:52:09 AMQB's with more TD's than Freeman: Drew Brees, Peyton Manning, Aaron Rodgers. QB's with less INT's than Freeman (400+ attempts) : Tom BradyThis thread is nothing but further proof of what a complete joke of a fanbase this team has.This
QB's with more TD's than Freeman: Drew Brees, Peyton Manning, Aaron Rodgers. QB's with less INT's than Freeman (400+ attempts) : Tom BradyThis thread is nothing but further proof of what a complete joke of a fanbase this team has.
Quote from: Hayseed on December 10, 2012, 08:30:46 PMQuote from: Morgan on December 10, 2012, 08:31:06 AMQuote from: youngone on December 10, 2012, 08:28:40 AMQuote from: CBWx2 on December 10, 2012, 07:52:09 AMQB's with more TD's than Freeman: Drew Brees, Peyton Manning, Aaron Rodgers. QB's with less INT's than Freeman (400+ attempts) : Tom BradyThis thread is nothing but further proof of what a complete joke of a fanbase this team has.Thisthose QBs that you're comparing Freeman to would have sliced and diced the Eagles defense. Bucs get 21 points against one of the league's worst teams, and 7 of them were gifted by a botched punt.Again, why do you judge him on a game by game basis? Brady lost to the Cardinals in Foxboro. Ridiculous.I've been judging him year to year basis and game to game, and I go to around three training camp practices a year. Statistically good season or bad, he is not accurate, Doesn't see the field well, does a poor job making reads, and he never manipulates the defense with pump fakes and looking off defenders. He is a below average NFL QB in terms of passing, and an above average NFL QB in terms of physical skill set. If he is surrounded by awesome weapons and a good defense, he should play well well enough to win more games then he loses, but who wouldnt?when good QBs complete passes multiple plays in a row, you don't think anything of it. When Freeman completes a pass I catch myself saying "nice throw!" when in reality any QB on an NFL roster should be able to make it that throw.I will give Freeman credit for 2 things. He is usually pretty clutch. and when he has a good player he's not afraid to trust them to go make a play even if they're covered. Calvin Johnson would never have had a slow start to the season if Freeman was his QB.I know people here peg me as a Freeman hater, but I root for him every week of course. However, my stance is and forever will be the Bucs would be a better team with an accurate QB/ a QB known for being a good passer. Since I know Freeman isn't being replaced anytime soon, I am very glad we have Vjax, Mike Williams, Nicks, Joseph, Penn, Doug Martin all on the same team in the future. Its not hard to be successful with that group.
To me a better joke is all the people who have been watching football for so long but still think stats tell the real story. If data and text didnt exist and there was no way to record and archive stats, then you would have to see for yourself what exactly is happening and make the judgement calls. If you just use your brain and eyes who would you think the best QBs are? Manning, Brees, Rodgers, and Brady. That would be the unanimous top 4 that everyone would pick without stats of yardage, TDs, previous win loss records, or post season records. Now using the same no stat analysis on Freeman, he would not even remotely be any where near those 4 QBs. Yet you are basically saying he is close to them. If that is not what you are saying then your post has zero meaning so I don't know why you think "thread is nothing but further proof of what a complete joke of a fanbase this team has."
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.
CBWx2. Do you think Freeman deserves any portion of blame or criticism for his performances in the Philly, Denver, Dallas, or Washington games?
Also, how much do you value stats? Do you look at them as the primary barometer of a QBs play? Do you think some stats are inflated on a situational basis and can make a player look as if he is performing a little better than what he is putting on "tape"?
Quote from: chace1986 on December 11, 2012, 06:17:50 PMCBWx2. Do you think Freeman deserves any portion of blame or criticism for his performances in the Philly, Denver, Dallas, or Washington games?Criticism for all. Hell, you can easily criticize him for some things he did in the games he played well in. Some portion of blame for Dallas and Denver. He did enough in the Philly and Washington games for us to have won. The reason we lost didn't fall on him. There is also a world of difference between criticizing a poor performance and starting a thread stating that Freeman is not the answer and needs to be cut or traded every time we lose a football game.Quote from: chace1986 on December 11, 2012, 06:17:50 PMAlso, how much do you value stats? Do you look at them as the primary barometer of a QBs play? Do you think some stats are inflated on a situational basis and can make a player look as if he is performing a little better than what he is putting on "tape"?I do look at them as the primary barometer. Do they tell the complete story? No. But I find it a complete impossibility for any QB to throw the football 33 times a game, post stats that place him in the top 5 in many passing categories, and still be a garbage QB. But maybe I'm just silly that way.
freeman probably shouldnt have played well earlier in the season and raised expectations of himself.
Any logical fan without an axe to grind knew that the system would have adjustment time. Timing alone would take five or six games.
Quote from: GameTime on December 11, 2012, 09:36:52 PMfreeman probably shouldnt have played well earlier in the season and raised expectations of himself. Any logical fan without an axe to grind knew that the system would have adjustment time. Timing alone would take five or six games.