Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: Feel Real Good on December 20, 2012, 03:40:09 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 03:36:27 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 20, 2012, 03:27:51 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 03:21:48 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 20, 2012, 03:18:34 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 03:04:09 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 20, 2012, 02:28:28 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 02:11:45 PMQuote from: BucBalla85 on December 20, 2012, 02:03:20 PMYea because he did so well with his own team that had just as bad as a defense as we do. SMH.In 2009, the Saints 20th ranked defense in points against and 25th ranked defense in yards against... they won the Super Bowl that year. Against the pass, they were 25th... against the run, they were 21st. History shows... that when the Saints aren't without their head coach and defensive coordinator, Drew Brees can go 13-3 and win a super bowl when he has one of the worst defenses in the league.Saints won the Super Bowl in 2009 with a bad defense because they got a ton of takeaways that year (39). When they don't get takeaways, they don't win as much. This year they only have 24 takeaways, the same number the Bucs have.The offense can easily help the defense in that by moving the ball a lot, time of possession, and scoring. When you do that with your offense, you force your opponent to be not only one-dimensional, but also bigger risk takers. When that happens, your defense can be more aggressive... which is what happened in '09. The Saints got turnovers because they were aggressive. They had that luxury because they had Brees on offense.You really think Drew Brees and Josh Freeman are so close in ability that Brees would not have gotten us the win against Dallas? Philly? Giants? Eagles? Redskins?You don't get more takeaways because you have a good offense. The Saints never had more than 25 in any other year of the Brees era. Why do the Saints have the exact same number of takeaways as the Bucs if the Saints offense is so much better?You don't think the HC and DC being suspended has anything to do with that?This year without the HC and DC, the Saints have 24 takeaways. After the 39 they had in 2009, the second best they ever did with the HC and DC was 25. They're on pace to have their second best season in takeaways of the Brees era without the HC and DC.This year with the Saints is a disaster, to try and use anything they're doing this year and try to compare it to any other year... good or bad, is nuts. Drew Brees as a QB / player, is easily 5 games better over the course of a season than Josh Freeman.You sure you don't want to talk about takeaways anymore?LOL... the Saints were only good in '09 because they could turn the ball over? That's what you're saying? Stop.
Quote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 03:36:27 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 20, 2012, 03:27:51 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 03:21:48 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 20, 2012, 03:18:34 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 03:04:09 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 20, 2012, 02:28:28 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 02:11:45 PMQuote from: BucBalla85 on December 20, 2012, 02:03:20 PMYea because he did so well with his own team that had just as bad as a defense as we do. SMH.In 2009, the Saints 20th ranked defense in points against and 25th ranked defense in yards against... they won the Super Bowl that year. Against the pass, they were 25th... against the run, they were 21st. History shows... that when the Saints aren't without their head coach and defensive coordinator, Drew Brees can go 13-3 and win a super bowl when he has one of the worst defenses in the league.Saints won the Super Bowl in 2009 with a bad defense because they got a ton of takeaways that year (39). When they don't get takeaways, they don't win as much. This year they only have 24 takeaways, the same number the Bucs have.The offense can easily help the defense in that by moving the ball a lot, time of possession, and scoring. When you do that with your offense, you force your opponent to be not only one-dimensional, but also bigger risk takers. When that happens, your defense can be more aggressive... which is what happened in '09. The Saints got turnovers because they were aggressive. They had that luxury because they had Brees on offense.You really think Drew Brees and Josh Freeman are so close in ability that Brees would not have gotten us the win against Dallas? Philly? Giants? Eagles? Redskins?You don't get more takeaways because you have a good offense. The Saints never had more than 25 in any other year of the Brees era. Why do the Saints have the exact same number of takeaways as the Bucs if the Saints offense is so much better?You don't think the HC and DC being suspended has anything to do with that?This year without the HC and DC, the Saints have 24 takeaways. After the 39 they had in 2009, the second best they ever did with the HC and DC was 25. They're on pace to have their second best season in takeaways of the Brees era without the HC and DC.This year with the Saints is a disaster, to try and use anything they're doing this year and try to compare it to any other year... good or bad, is nuts. Drew Brees as a QB / player, is easily 5 games better over the course of a season than Josh Freeman.You sure you don't want to talk about takeaways anymore?
Quote from: Feel Real Good on December 20, 2012, 03:27:51 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 03:21:48 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 20, 2012, 03:18:34 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 03:04:09 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 20, 2012, 02:28:28 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 02:11:45 PMQuote from: BucBalla85 on December 20, 2012, 02:03:20 PMYea because he did so well with his own team that had just as bad as a defense as we do. SMH.In 2009, the Saints 20th ranked defense in points against and 25th ranked defense in yards against... they won the Super Bowl that year. Against the pass, they were 25th... against the run, they were 21st. History shows... that when the Saints aren't without their head coach and defensive coordinator, Drew Brees can go 13-3 and win a super bowl when he has one of the worst defenses in the league.Saints won the Super Bowl in 2009 with a bad defense because they got a ton of takeaways that year (39). When they don't get takeaways, they don't win as much. This year they only have 24 takeaways, the same number the Bucs have.The offense can easily help the defense in that by moving the ball a lot, time of possession, and scoring. When you do that with your offense, you force your opponent to be not only one-dimensional, but also bigger risk takers. When that happens, your defense can be more aggressive... which is what happened in '09. The Saints got turnovers because they were aggressive. They had that luxury because they had Brees on offense.You really think Drew Brees and Josh Freeman are so close in ability that Brees would not have gotten us the win against Dallas? Philly? Giants? Eagles? Redskins?You don't get more takeaways because you have a good offense. The Saints never had more than 25 in any other year of the Brees era. Why do the Saints have the exact same number of takeaways as the Bucs if the Saints offense is so much better?You don't think the HC and DC being suspended has anything to do with that?This year without the HC and DC, the Saints have 24 takeaways. After the 39 they had in 2009, the second best they ever did with the HC and DC was 25. They're on pace to have their second best season in takeaways of the Brees era without the HC and DC.This year with the Saints is a disaster, to try and use anything they're doing this year and try to compare it to any other year... good or bad, is nuts. Drew Brees as a QB / player, is easily 5 games better over the course of a season than Josh Freeman.
Quote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 03:21:48 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 20, 2012, 03:18:34 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 03:04:09 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 20, 2012, 02:28:28 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 02:11:45 PMQuote from: BucBalla85 on December 20, 2012, 02:03:20 PMYea because he did so well with his own team that had just as bad as a defense as we do. SMH.In 2009, the Saints 20th ranked defense in points against and 25th ranked defense in yards against... they won the Super Bowl that year. Against the pass, they were 25th... against the run, they were 21st. History shows... that when the Saints aren't without their head coach and defensive coordinator, Drew Brees can go 13-3 and win a super bowl when he has one of the worst defenses in the league.Saints won the Super Bowl in 2009 with a bad defense because they got a ton of takeaways that year (39). When they don't get takeaways, they don't win as much. This year they only have 24 takeaways, the same number the Bucs have.The offense can easily help the defense in that by moving the ball a lot, time of possession, and scoring. When you do that with your offense, you force your opponent to be not only one-dimensional, but also bigger risk takers. When that happens, your defense can be more aggressive... which is what happened in '09. The Saints got turnovers because they were aggressive. They had that luxury because they had Brees on offense.You really think Drew Brees and Josh Freeman are so close in ability that Brees would not have gotten us the win against Dallas? Philly? Giants? Eagles? Redskins?You don't get more takeaways because you have a good offense. The Saints never had more than 25 in any other year of the Brees era. Why do the Saints have the exact same number of takeaways as the Bucs if the Saints offense is so much better?You don't think the HC and DC being suspended has anything to do with that?This year without the HC and DC, the Saints have 24 takeaways. After the 39 they had in 2009, the second best they ever did with the HC and DC was 25. They're on pace to have their second best season in takeaways of the Brees era without the HC and DC.
Quote from: Feel Real Good on December 20, 2012, 03:18:34 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 03:04:09 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 20, 2012, 02:28:28 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 02:11:45 PMQuote from: BucBalla85 on December 20, 2012, 02:03:20 PMYea because he did so well with his own team that had just as bad as a defense as we do. SMH.In 2009, the Saints 20th ranked defense in points against and 25th ranked defense in yards against... they won the Super Bowl that year. Against the pass, they were 25th... against the run, they were 21st. History shows... that when the Saints aren't without their head coach and defensive coordinator, Drew Brees can go 13-3 and win a super bowl when he has one of the worst defenses in the league.Saints won the Super Bowl in 2009 with a bad defense because they got a ton of takeaways that year (39). When they don't get takeaways, they don't win as much. This year they only have 24 takeaways, the same number the Bucs have.The offense can easily help the defense in that by moving the ball a lot, time of possession, and scoring. When you do that with your offense, you force your opponent to be not only one-dimensional, but also bigger risk takers. When that happens, your defense can be more aggressive... which is what happened in '09. The Saints got turnovers because they were aggressive. They had that luxury because they had Brees on offense.You really think Drew Brees and Josh Freeman are so close in ability that Brees would not have gotten us the win against Dallas? Philly? Giants? Eagles? Redskins?You don't get more takeaways because you have a good offense. The Saints never had more than 25 in any other year of the Brees era. Why do the Saints have the exact same number of takeaways as the Bucs if the Saints offense is so much better?You don't think the HC and DC being suspended has anything to do with that?
Quote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 03:04:09 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 20, 2012, 02:28:28 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 02:11:45 PMQuote from: BucBalla85 on December 20, 2012, 02:03:20 PMYea because he did so well with his own team that had just as bad as a defense as we do. SMH.In 2009, the Saints 20th ranked defense in points against and 25th ranked defense in yards against... they won the Super Bowl that year. Against the pass, they were 25th... against the run, they were 21st. History shows... that when the Saints aren't without their head coach and defensive coordinator, Drew Brees can go 13-3 and win a super bowl when he has one of the worst defenses in the league.Saints won the Super Bowl in 2009 with a bad defense because they got a ton of takeaways that year (39). When they don't get takeaways, they don't win as much. This year they only have 24 takeaways, the same number the Bucs have.The offense can easily help the defense in that by moving the ball a lot, time of possession, and scoring. When you do that with your offense, you force your opponent to be not only one-dimensional, but also bigger risk takers. When that happens, your defense can be more aggressive... which is what happened in '09. The Saints got turnovers because they were aggressive. They had that luxury because they had Brees on offense.You really think Drew Brees and Josh Freeman are so close in ability that Brees would not have gotten us the win against Dallas? Philly? Giants? Eagles? Redskins?You don't get more takeaways because you have a good offense. The Saints never had more than 25 in any other year of the Brees era. Why do the Saints have the exact same number of takeaways as the Bucs if the Saints offense is so much better?
Quote from: Feel Real Good on December 20, 2012, 02:28:28 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 02:11:45 PMQuote from: BucBalla85 on December 20, 2012, 02:03:20 PMYea because he did so well with his own team that had just as bad as a defense as we do. SMH.In 2009, the Saints 20th ranked defense in points against and 25th ranked defense in yards against... they won the Super Bowl that year. Against the pass, they were 25th... against the run, they were 21st. History shows... that when the Saints aren't without their head coach and defensive coordinator, Drew Brees can go 13-3 and win a super bowl when he has one of the worst defenses in the league.Saints won the Super Bowl in 2009 with a bad defense because they got a ton of takeaways that year (39). When they don't get takeaways, they don't win as much. This year they only have 24 takeaways, the same number the Bucs have.The offense can easily help the defense in that by moving the ball a lot, time of possession, and scoring. When you do that with your offense, you force your opponent to be not only one-dimensional, but also bigger risk takers. When that happens, your defense can be more aggressive... which is what happened in '09. The Saints got turnovers because they were aggressive. They had that luxury because they had Brees on offense.You really think Drew Brees and Josh Freeman are so close in ability that Brees would not have gotten us the win against Dallas? Philly? Giants? Eagles? Redskins?
Quote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 02:11:45 PMQuote from: BucBalla85 on December 20, 2012, 02:03:20 PMYea because he did so well with his own team that had just as bad as a defense as we do. SMH.In 2009, the Saints 20th ranked defense in points against and 25th ranked defense in yards against... they won the Super Bowl that year. Against the pass, they were 25th... against the run, they were 21st. History shows... that when the Saints aren't without their head coach and defensive coordinator, Drew Brees can go 13-3 and win a super bowl when he has one of the worst defenses in the league.Saints won the Super Bowl in 2009 with a bad defense because they got a ton of takeaways that year (39). When they don't get takeaways, they don't win as much. This year they only have 24 takeaways, the same number the Bucs have.
Quote from: BucBalla85 on December 20, 2012, 02:03:20 PMYea because he did so well with his own team that had just as bad as a defense as we do. SMH.In 2009, the Saints 20th ranked defense in points against and 25th ranked defense in yards against... they won the Super Bowl that year. Against the pass, they were 25th... against the run, they were 21st. History shows... that when the Saints aren't without their head coach and defensive coordinator, Drew Brees can go 13-3 and win a super bowl when he has one of the worst defenses in the league.
Yea because he did so well with his own team that had just as bad as a defense as we do. SMH.
Quote from: Buc on the Move on December 20, 2012, 03:39:05 PMWow, talk about a thread getting hijacked. . .I guess TBay XXXVII thinks we need Drew Brees next year. I think there is a whole board for Fantasy Football man, let's talk about reality. Freeman is going to be our QB next year. Will we bring in a better backup to maybe put a little heat on him. . .possibly, but other than A. Smith or Vick, I don't think there are any good options out there, and don't know that either of those fit the bill either. When upgrading talent on this team this offseason is the topic, I think it is pretty obvious that defense has to be the priority. So let's examine the def. positions:1) DL - Job 1 stop the run...check. Job 2 get to the QB...need to get healthy, and maybe add a stud DE or improvement at NT. Could one of our guys become a stud DE (Clayborn, Bowers, Bennett), maybe. Can we pluck one out of the draft or FA, yet to be seen. I think NT is a position that could use an upgrade (Culpepper and Booger used to get a lot more QB pressure than Miller or Gibson ever do).2) LB - Much improved this season, yet still more room for improvement, especially in pass coverage. Could Mason play SLB if we bring in a stud rookie MLB? If the right player is there as BPA maybe we go for it.3) CB - Sure Biggers has improved, but still never seems to know where the ball is. Our other guys show flashes, but still leave much to be desired. This is without a doubt the position in the most need of an upgrade, especially if we part ways with Wright. Not saying here that our young guys are trash. They have potential, but a FA, trade or draft pickup, could help a lot here.4) S - I think we are fairly set here. I would welcome Ronde back. I don't think his play has dropped off too much, and his leadership is invaluable. Black is learning, and can be a serviceable replacement, but again if a BPA FS is available when we pick, I wouldn't be displeased.All in all, I think that BPA is the way to get it done in the draft. If we lock into positions of need, we end up with guys who may be a reach. I know you've heard all this before, but it's all true. If you end up stacked at a position, it enables you to use unique formations to get your best talent on the field and create mismatches, and opens you up to have the upper hand in trade scenarios to fill positions of need.All those positions of need are more important this off season than QB, only because there isn't a quality franchise caliber QB in this draft or free agency.
Wow, talk about a thread getting hijacked. . .I guess TBay XXXVII thinks we need Drew Brees next year. I think there is a whole board for Fantasy Football man, let's talk about reality. Freeman is going to be our QB next year. Will we bring in a better backup to maybe put a little heat on him. . .possibly, but other than A. Smith or Vick, I don't think there are any good options out there, and don't know that either of those fit the bill either. When upgrading talent on this team this offseason is the topic, I think it is pretty obvious that defense has to be the priority. So let's examine the def. positions:1) DL - Job 1 stop the run...check. Job 2 get to the QB...need to get healthy, and maybe add a stud DE or improvement at NT. Could one of our guys become a stud DE (Clayborn, Bowers, Bennett), maybe. Can we pluck one out of the draft or FA, yet to be seen. I think NT is a position that could use an upgrade (Culpepper and Booger used to get a lot more QB pressure than Miller or Gibson ever do).2) LB - Much improved this season, yet still more room for improvement, especially in pass coverage. Could Mason play SLB if we bring in a stud rookie MLB? If the right player is there as BPA maybe we go for it.3) CB - Sure Biggers has improved, but still never seems to know where the ball is. Our other guys show flashes, but still leave much to be desired. This is without a doubt the position in the most need of an upgrade, especially if we part ways with Wright. Not saying here that our young guys are trash. They have potential, but a FA, trade or draft pickup, could help a lot here.4) S - I think we are fairly set here. I would welcome Ronde back. I don't think his play has dropped off too much, and his leadership is invaluable. Black is learning, and can be a serviceable replacement, but again if a BPA FS is available when we pick, I wouldn't be displeased.All in all, I think that BPA is the way to get it done in the draft. If we lock into positions of need, we end up with guys who may be a reach. I know you've heard all this before, but it's all true. If you end up stacked at a position, it enables you to use unique formations to get your best talent on the field and create mismatches, and opens you up to have the upper hand in trade scenarios to fill positions of need.
It's pretty simple. Brees throws for a million yards and a bunch of touchdowns every year. The year they won the Super Bowl they had a +11 turnover differential. The best they've done in any other year was +1. Coincidence? I think not.
Quote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 03:43:46 PMQuote from: Buc on the Move on December 20, 2012, 03:39:05 PMWow, talk about a thread getting hijacked. . .I guess TBay XXXVII thinks we need Drew Brees next year. I think there is a whole board for Fantasy Football man, let's talk about reality. Freeman is going to be our QB next year. Will we bring in a better backup to maybe put a little heat on him. . .possibly, but other than A. Smith or Vick, I don't think there are any good options out there, and don't know that either of those fit the bill either. When upgrading talent on this team this offseason is the topic, I think it is pretty obvious that defense has to be the priority. So let's examine the def. positions:1) DL - Job 1 stop the run...check. Job 2 get to the QB...need to get healthy, and maybe add a stud DE or improvement at NT. Could one of our guys become a stud DE (Clayborn, Bowers, Bennett), maybe. Can we pluck one out of the draft or FA, yet to be seen. I think NT is a position that could use an upgrade (Culpepper and Booger used to get a lot more QB pressure than Miller or Gibson ever do).2) LB - Much improved this season, yet still more room for improvement, especially in pass coverage. Could Mason play SLB if we bring in a stud rookie MLB? If the right player is there as BPA maybe we go for it.3) CB - Sure Biggers has improved, but still never seems to know where the ball is. Our other guys show flashes, but still leave much to be desired. This is without a doubt the position in the most need of an upgrade, especially if we part ways with Wright. Not saying here that our young guys are trash. They have potential, but a FA, trade or draft pickup, could help a lot here.4) S - I think we are fairly set here. I would welcome Ronde back. I don't think his play has dropped off too much, and his leadership is invaluable. Black is learning, and can be a serviceable replacement, but again if a BPA FS is available when we pick, I wouldn't be displeased.All in all, I think that BPA is the way to get it done in the draft. If we lock into positions of need, we end up with guys who may be a reach. I know you've heard all this before, but it's all true. If you end up stacked at a position, it enables you to use unique formations to get your best talent on the field and create mismatches, and opens you up to have the upper hand in trade scenarios to fill positions of need.All those positions of need are more important this off season than QB, only because there isn't a quality franchise caliber QB in this draft or free agency. He's dead serious about this, everyone. Oh my god, there's no way you can be this stupid.
Quote from: RogerGoodellSucks on December 20, 2012, 03:56:39 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 03:43:46 PMQuote from: Buc on the Move on December 20, 2012, 03:39:05 PMWow, talk about a thread getting hijacked. . .I guess TBay XXXVII thinks we need Drew Brees next year. I think there is a whole board for Fantasy Football man, let's talk about reality. Freeman is going to be our QB next year. Will we bring in a better backup to maybe put a little heat on him. . .possibly, but other than A. Smith or Vick, I don't think there are any good options out there, and don't know that either of those fit the bill either. When upgrading talent on this team this offseason is the topic, I think it is pretty obvious that defense has to be the priority. So let's examine the def. positions:1) DL - Job 1 stop the run...check. Job 2 get to the QB...need to get healthy, and maybe add a stud DE or improvement at NT. Could one of our guys become a stud DE (Clayborn, Bowers, Bennett), maybe. Can we pluck one out of the draft or FA, yet to be seen. I think NT is a position that could use an upgrade (Culpepper and Booger used to get a lot more QB pressure than Miller or Gibson ever do).2) LB - Much improved this season, yet still more room for improvement, especially in pass coverage. Could Mason play SLB if we bring in a stud rookie MLB? If the right player is there as BPA maybe we go for it.3) CB - Sure Biggers has improved, but still never seems to know where the ball is. Our other guys show flashes, but still leave much to be desired. This is without a doubt the position in the most need of an upgrade, especially if we part ways with Wright. Not saying here that our young guys are trash. They have potential, but a FA, trade or draft pickup, could help a lot here.4) S - I think we are fairly set here. I would welcome Ronde back. I don't think his play has dropped off too much, and his leadership is invaluable. Black is learning, and can be a serviceable replacement, but again if a BPA FS is available when we pick, I wouldn't be displeased.All in all, I think that BPA is the way to get it done in the draft. If we lock into positions of need, we end up with guys who may be a reach. I know you've heard all this before, but it's all true. If you end up stacked at a position, it enables you to use unique formations to get your best talent on the field and create mismatches, and opens you up to have the upper hand in trade scenarios to fill positions of need.All those positions of need are more important this off season than QB, only because there isn't a quality franchise caliber QB in this draft or free agency. He's dead serious about this, everyone. Oh my god, there's no way you can be this stupid.Wait, you don't think the Bucs need upgrades on the defense... and I'm the stupid one?
Quote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 04:32:36 PMQuote from: RogerGoodellSucks on December 20, 2012, 03:56:39 PMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on December 20, 2012, 03:43:46 PMQuote from: Buc on the Move on December 20, 2012, 03:39:05 PMWow, talk about a thread getting hijacked. . .I guess TBay XXXVII thinks we need Drew Brees next year. I think there is a whole board for Fantasy Football man, let's talk about reality. Freeman is going to be our QB next year. Will we bring in a better backup to maybe put a little heat on him. . .possibly, but other than A. Smith or Vick, I don't think there are any good options out there, and don't know that either of those fit the bill either. When upgrading talent on this team this offseason is the topic, I think it is pretty obvious that defense has to be the priority. So let's examine the def. positions:1) DL - Job 1 stop the run...check. Job 2 get to the QB...need to get healthy, and maybe add a stud DE or improvement at NT. Could one of our guys become a stud DE (Clayborn, Bowers, Bennett), maybe. Can we pluck one out of the draft or FA, yet to be seen. I think NT is a position that could use an upgrade (Culpepper and Booger used to get a lot more QB pressure than Miller or Gibson ever do).2) LB - Much improved this season, yet still more room for improvement, especially in pass coverage. Could Mason play SLB if we bring in a stud rookie MLB? If the right player is there as BPA maybe we go for it.3) CB - Sure Biggers has improved, but still never seems to know where the ball is. Our other guys show flashes, but still leave much to be desired. This is without a doubt the position in the most need of an upgrade, especially if we part ways with Wright. Not saying here that our young guys are trash. They have potential, but a FA, trade or draft pickup, could help a lot here.4) S - I think we are fairly set here. I would welcome Ronde back. I don't think his play has dropped off too much, and his leadership is invaluable. Black is learning, and can be a serviceable replacement, but again if a BPA FS is available when we pick, I wouldn't be displeased.All in all, I think that BPA is the way to get it done in the draft. If we lock into positions of need, we end up with guys who may be a reach. I know you've heard all this before, but it's all true. If you end up stacked at a position, it enables you to use unique formations to get your best talent on the field and create mismatches, and opens you up to have the upper hand in trade scenarios to fill positions of need.All those positions of need are more important this off season than QB, only because there isn't a quality franchise caliber QB in this draft or free agency. He's dead serious about this, everyone. Oh my god, there's no way you can be this stupid.Wait, you don't think the Bucs need upgrades on the defense... and I'm the stupid one?No, because you actually think that even if there were good options out there, we would move on from Freeman.