Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
After re-watching the play several times its underscores just how bad Freeman has been at reading through his progressions even with time to throw.Setting the stage:Bucs are trailing by 7 with 4:31 to go in the first quarter - it's 2nd and ten from the Saints 20 - Bucs are in 11 personnel and Clark is flexed out wide with Freeman in the shotgun. Clark runs a comeback, Underwood runs a drag route, Jackson runs a post and Williams runs a corner route, Martin leaks out of the backfield on a little flat route.Freeman predetermines who he's throwing too before reading through his progression - if he would have read through his progression with the defender covering Clark having inside positioning - the football should have gone to Underwood who flashed right in front of him or his check down option out of the backfield in Martin who was uncovered and with the closest defender 9-yards away from him with his back turned - a case could also be made for Jackson as well - throwing over the top of the LB and leading Jackson a tad - either option was a safer option for Freeman. He could have also stepped up in the pocket and ran for a decent gain as well. Not sure if he lacks confidence in his offensive line at this time - but he had a clean pocket and decided to hurry his throw to the wrong receiver - which is what happened the entire game.Below is the still photo's...
Quote from: RogerGoodellSucks on December 19, 2012, 02:06:08 PMNo surprise to see this. It's pretty obvious that all the Freeman bashers are overreacting.i agree with this, myself certainly included.Quote from: RogerGoodellSucks on December 19, 2012, 02:06:08 PM You guys keep telling yourselves he sucks and we can't win with him. Everyone else, including NFL coaches around the league will continue to laugh at your lack of football knowledge.i disagree with this. most knowledgeable posters here understand we can win with freeman. most dont thnk he sucks. but many of us think he just is slightly above average overall. ups, downs, and nothing in between. its gotten to the point where the argument is "we can win with him" instead of "we can win because of him"
No surprise to see this. It's pretty obvious that all the Freeman bashers are overreacting.
You guys keep telling yourselves he sucks and we can't win with him. Everyone else, including NFL coaches around the league will continue to laugh at your lack of football knowledge.
I've seen multiple people here who said he sucks and we can't win anything with him.
Illuminator is a good poster. He sticks to his guns and makes good points. Some don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'t like that.
“We run a certain team’s offense,” Williams said, referring to the Giants offense brought from New York by former Giants quarterback coach and current Bucs offensive coordinator Mike Sullivan. “The quarterback of that offense [Eli Manning] said it took him six years before he fully understood the offense. That quarterback now has two rings.”
Quote from: RogerGoodellSucks on December 19, 2012, 02:16:11 PMI've seen multiple people here who said he sucks and we can't win anything with him.look into the ignore function. or decide what posters are worth debating with.
Quote from: chace1986 on December 19, 2012, 02:02:55 PMQuote from: BucBalla85 on December 19, 2012, 02:01:55 PMWas good enough to win 2 super bowl rings or was it the team around him that helped him win those 2 SB rings?? Think about that one guys.Both. Eli was hardly a game manager in both of those SB runs.You can't be serious.The Patriots offense was unstoppable in 2007. Literally, no one could stop them.The Giants held them to 14 points in the Superbowl and were the only team who could actually put Brady under pressure because their pass rush was so good. You seriously think Eli Manning was the main reason the Giants won the Superbowl?Just look at his numbers during that run. He wasn't asked to do much, he was definitely just a game manager for that Superbowl run.I'll give you that he did play a big role in the other Superbowl run, but that wasn't until he had a good 6 years of NFL experience.
Quote from: BucBalla85 on December 19, 2012, 02:01:55 PMWas good enough to win 2 super bowl rings or was it the team around him that helped him win those 2 SB rings?? Think about that one guys.Both. Eli was hardly a game manager in both of those SB runs.
Was good enough to win 2 super bowl rings or was it the team around him that helped him win those 2 SB rings?? Think about that one guys.
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.
Quote from: GameTime on December 19, 2012, 02:21:16 PMQuote from: RogerGoodellSucks on December 19, 2012, 02:16:11 PMI've seen multiple people here who said he sucks and we can't win anything with him.look into the ignore function. or decide what posters are worth debating with.Personally, other than Java who takes to the extremes entirely too much, I don't think anyone has said to cut him now... draft a first round QB... or go out and sign his replacement in the offseason. Almost everyone is saying to let him finish out his contract and decide then. He's just basically looking at people who offer differing opinions than the "blind homer" to absolutely hate Freeman.
Gametine - they run Gilbrides offense