Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: yuccaneers on December 21, 2012, 01:27:11 AMThe offensive scheme is not predicated on having a dynamic TE - its predicated on having a dynamic slot receiver with two talented receivers playing on the outside - this is why initially Benn was so ecstatic after talking to PJ Fleck on the phone after Sullivan was hired. It only needs a capable player at TE.If you look at how Dominik has gone about building the team its almost identical to that of the Giants model: draft receivers, defensive lineman, running backs and defensive backs - bring in offensive lineman via free agency. Spend middle to late round picks on tight ends.Have a feeling the team will draft a slot receiver this draft before they draft a tight end.I kinda agree with that. I do see that free looks for VJ MW then the slot only recently he started going to Clark. But I do believe Clark will be back next year and I don't see us drafting a TE in the first 2 days
The offensive scheme is not predicated on having a dynamic TE - its predicated on having a dynamic slot receiver with two talented receivers playing on the outside - this is why initially Benn was so ecstatic after talking to PJ Fleck on the phone after Sullivan was hired. It only needs a capable player at TE.If you look at how Dominik has gone about building the team its almost identical to that of the Giants model: draft receivers, defensive lineman, running backs and defensive backs - bring in offensive lineman via free agency. Spend middle to late round picks on tight ends.Have a feeling the team will draft a slot receiver this draft before they draft a tight end.
If the Bucs were drafting today.This si what I would like to see happen especially if Te'o was on the board when the Bucs are on the clock:1. LB Manti Te'o2. CB Jordan Poyer3. DT Kawann Short4. WR Stedman Bailey4. CB Leon McFadden5. S Duke Williams6. DE David Bass7. QB Matt Brown
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.
Where we will be picking in the 1st, Rhodes would be a sort of a reach....but then again we reached last year @ #7...so it wouldn't be too big of a surprise.
love rhodes as a player but hes a reach in the teens. if we trade back into the 20s he is a better value. im not overly enamored with banks or milliner. both can look great at times and ive seen both get completely owned in some games
Quote from: dexmonkey on December 21, 2012, 08:20:01 AMlove rhodes as a player but hes a reach in the teens. if we trade back into the 20s he is a better value. im not overly enamored with banks or milliner. both can look great at times and ive seen both get completely owned in some gamesJust because mock drafts have him as a late 1st rounder doesn't mean that's how teams view him. Mock drafts always have a couple of players who get slotted in completely wrong draft positions, and it's not because of a lack of talent, it's because they don't know what they're talking about. Rhodes is the best CB prospect in the draft, and it wouldn't surprise me at all if he went at #10.
Quote from: lyronmewis on December 21, 2012, 11:54:35 AMQuote from: dexmonkey on December 21, 2012, 08:20:01 AMlove rhodes as a player but hes a reach in the teens. if we trade back into the 20s he is a better value. im not overly enamored with banks or milliner. both can look great at times and ive seen both get completely owned in some gamesJust because mock drafts have him as a late 1st rounder doesn't mean that's how teams view him. Mock drafts always have a couple of players who get slotted in completely wrong draft positions, and it's not because of a lack of talent, it's because they don't know what they're talking about. Rhodes is the best CB prospect in the draft, and it wouldn't surprise me at all if he went at #10.He could move ahead of Banks, I don't see him being picked before Milliner, though.Alabama DBs seem to get drafted earlier than they should be....(see #7 pick last year)
Quote from: chace1986 on December 21, 2012, 12:09:59 PMQuote from: lyronmewis on December 21, 2012, 11:54:35 AMQuote from: dexmonkey on December 21, 2012, 08:20:01 AMlove rhodes as a player but hes a reach in the teens. if we trade back into the 20s he is a better value. im not overly enamored with banks or milliner. both can look great at times and ive seen both get completely owned in some gamesJust because mock drafts have him as a late 1st rounder doesn't mean that's how teams view him. Mock drafts always have a couple of players who get slotted in completely wrong draft positions, and it's not because of a lack of talent, it's because they don't know what they're talking about. Rhodes is the best CB prospect in the draft, and it wouldn't surprise me at all if he went at #10.He could move ahead of Banks, I don't see him being picked before Milliner, though.Alabama DBs seem to get drafted earlier than they should be....(see #7 pick last year)I could see that, but if Rhodes runs a 4.45, then he will go ahead of Milliner. He has the body of a SS, but can keep up with WRs. That's not something that you can pick up in every draft. He may be a bit more boom/bust than Milliner, because playing press coverage is about technique and studying receivers, and he may not have it in him, but if he does, then you're looking at a guy who can shut down the Calvin Johnsons of the league.