Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.
I think that focusing years of high picks and premium free agent signings on the interior of a team's offensive line is a lousy way to build a team.
Quote from: acacius on January 03, 2013, 01:39:15 PMI think that focusing years of high picks and premium free agent signings on the interior of a team's offensive line is a lousy way to build a team.Why? O Linemen have longer careers! So start out drafting them. Then the D line. Then the QB, LBs and TE. Then the WRs and DBs. Finish off with a rookie RB. Hopefully you obtained depth along the way.
Quote from: Lord Freesus on January 03, 2013, 02:12:42 PMQuote from: acacius on January 03, 2013, 01:39:15 PMI think that focusing years of high picks and premium free agent signings on the interior of a team's offensive line is a lousy way to build a team.Why? O Linemen have longer careers! So start out drafting them. Then the D line. Then the QB, LBs and TE. Then the WRs and DBs. Finish off with a rookie RB. Hopefully you obtained depth along the way.Because when you're talking offensive guards, it's a lousy value. Yes, there are exceptions at every position, but the quality of the player is much more strongly correlated with draft postion with other positions than it is with OGs. You draft at OG that high, he pretty much *has* to be Larry Allen to be worthwhile. If he's more Davin Joseph, it's a pretty lousy pick. *Good* teams can find quality guards outside of the first round.