Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: acacius on January 03, 2013, 03:05:16 PMQuote from: Lord Freesus on January 03, 2013, 02:12:42 PMQuote from: acacius on January 03, 2013, 01:39:15 PMI think that focusing years of high picks and premium free agent signings on the interior of a team's offensive line is a lousy way to build a team.Why? O Linemen have longer careers! So start out drafting them. Then the D line. Then the QB, LBs and TE. Then the WRs and DBs. Finish off with a rookie RB. Hopefully you obtained depth along the way.Because when you're talking offensive guards, it's a lousy value. Yes, there are exceptions at every position, but the quality of the player is much more strongly correlated with draft postion with other positions than it is with OGs. You draft at OG that high, he pretty much *has* to be Larry Allen to be worthwhile. If he's more Davin Joseph, it's a pretty lousy pick. *Good* teams can find quality guards outside of the first round.I never said draft a G in round one.
Quote from: Lord Freesus on January 03, 2013, 02:12:42 PMQuote from: acacius on January 03, 2013, 01:39:15 PMI think that focusing years of high picks and premium free agent signings on the interior of a team's offensive line is a lousy way to build a team.Why? O Linemen have longer careers! So start out drafting them. Then the D line. Then the QB, LBs and TE. Then the WRs and DBs. Finish off with a rookie RB. Hopefully you obtained depth along the way.Because when you're talking offensive guards, it's a lousy value. Yes, there are exceptions at every position, but the quality of the player is much more strongly correlated with draft postion with other positions than it is with OGs. You draft at OG that high, he pretty much *has* to be Larry Allen to be worthwhile. If he's more Davin Joseph, it's a pretty lousy pick. *Good* teams can find quality guards outside of the first round.
Quote from: acacius on January 03, 2013, 01:39:15 PMI think that focusing years of high picks and premium free agent signings on the interior of a team's offensive line is a lousy way to build a team.Why? O Linemen have longer careers! So start out drafting them. Then the D line. Then the QB, LBs and TE. Then the WRs and DBs. Finish off with a rookie RB. Hopefully you obtained depth along the way.
I think that focusing years of high picks and premium free agent signings on the interior of a team's offensive line is a lousy way to build a team.
Quote from: Lord Freesus on January 03, 2013, 03:15:55 PMQuote from: acacius on January 03, 2013, 03:05:16 PMQuote from: Lord Freesus on January 03, 2013, 02:12:42 PMQuote from: acacius on January 03, 2013, 01:39:15 PMI think that focusing years of high picks and premium free agent signings on the interior of a team's offensive line is a lousy way to build a team.Why? O Linemen have longer careers! So start out drafting them. Then the D line. Then the QB, LBs and TE. Then the WRs and DBs. Finish off with a rookie RB. Hopefully you obtained depth along the way.Because when you're talking offensive guards, it's a lousy value. Yes, there are exceptions at every position, but the quality of the player is much more strongly correlated with draft postion with other positions than it is with OGs. You draft at OG that high, he pretty much *has* to be Larry Allen to be worthwhile. If he's more Davin Joseph, it's a pretty lousy pick. *Good* teams can find quality guards outside of the first round.I never said draft a G in round one.Well, the topic at hand was Warmack, not to mention I'd specified interior offensive linemen in the post you were replying to. Hence my confusion.
It''s alright. Now, if we had Patriot's level of talent, yeah lets draft an interior o line man if its a need.
Werner, Rhodes, or Richardson in the 1st.
Quote from: JDouble on January 03, 2013, 04:41:27 PMWerner, Rhodes, or Richardson in the 1st.Okay, using my expert youtube research, I am on board with all of this.EDIT: Get Werner, Rhodes and Richardson in the first!
Quote from: Spoolios on January 03, 2013, 04:55:43 PMQuote from: JDouble on January 03, 2013, 04:41:27 PMWerner, Rhodes, or Richardson in the 1st.Okay, using my expert youtube research, I am on board with all of this.EDIT: Get Werner, Rhodes and Richardson in the first! I haven't watched hardly any college football this year, so I'm youtubing it as well.