Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: Boid Fink on January 11, 2013, 05:19:22 PMI like X. He is seemingly a cure for what ails the Bucs. But what if the Bucs just draft more offense? That Eifert kid is a stud prospect, and would seemingly improve the paper thin TE ranks. Provide another big target for the erratic #5.yeah I like Rhodes, but none of the CBs truly impress me enough to draft them instead of trying to make the offense eliteEifert isn't Vernon Davis or anything in terms of potential, but he's still the best foreseeable TE prospect we can lay our hands onWith him you won't have to worry about Doug Martin getting stuffed because of poor blocking on the edges. You will also get another good redzone target and safety net for Freeman.
I like X. He is seemingly a cure for what ails the Bucs. But what if the Bucs just draft more offense? That Eifert kid is a stud prospect, and would seemingly improve the paper thin TE ranks. Provide another big target for the erratic #5.
Quote from: lyronmewis on January 11, 2013, 06:04:53 PMQuote from: Boid Fink on January 11, 2013, 05:19:22 PMI like X. He is seemingly a cure for what ails the Bucs. But what if the Bucs just draft more offense? That Eifert kid is a stud prospect, and would seemingly improve the paper thin TE ranks. Provide another big target for the erratic #5.yeah I like Rhodes, but none of the CBs truly impress me enough to draft them instead of trying to make the offense eliteEifert isn't Vernon Davis or anything in terms of potential, but he's still the best foreseeable TE prospect we can lay our hands onWith him you won't have to worry about Doug Martin getting stuffed because of poor blocking on the edges. You will also get another good redzone target and safety net for Freeman.Zach Ertz is a better TE prospect than Eifert. theyre close but Ertz is more physical and a much better blocker. hes a complete TE where Eifert is primarily a receiver at this stage
Trade down for Rhodes in the 1st is OK, but too dare at 13. Can't reach based on need! If we can't move back, best player and try again in round 2... Him at FS would be amazing. Probably a better FS than CB anyway.
Quote from: tmac87 on January 11, 2013, 08:24:07 PMTrade down for Rhodes in the 1st is OK, but too dare at 13. Can't reach based on need! If we can't move back, best player and try again in round 2... Him at FS would be amazing. Probably a better FS than CB anyway.i agree that we should trade back for rhodes as it stands RIGHT NOW. that doesnt mean he will be a reach after the combine and his pro day. the biggest question draft pundits have on him is his speed. if he proves that he runs a 4.4 or a low 4.5 in the 40 he becomes very much a solid pick at 13. hes already got plenty of tape taking on and shutting down multiple talented receivers. the final question for him is does he have the speed to match up on guys like calvin johnson and larry fitzgerald. if he runs a good 40 time he could very well be the first corner off the board with his size and skillset. 6"2 corners that are physical and hae coverage skills dont grow on trees
So we trade back for Rhodes....and then someone else takes him in the top 15 and we are idiots. No thanks. Milliner and Rhodes are 1a and 1b. As long as we get one we should be happy considering how horrible we are at CB. Trading back and praying he falls is just stupid.
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.
i agree that we should trade back for rhodes as it stands RIGHT NOW. that doesnt mean he will be a reach after the combine and his pro day...