Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
I wish someone would just ask Schiano or even Freeman, whats the deal with the no running allowed for #5.Something is going on, Schiano has commented on it a bit, but IIRC all he said was ....he [Freeman] is allowed to make that decision. I guess they are afraid he ends up like RG III.
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.
Quote from: The Anti-Java on January 16, 2013, 02:55:28 PMI wish someone would just ask Schiano or even Freeman, whats the deal with the no running allowed for #5.Something is going on, Schiano has commented on it a bit, but IIRC all he said was ....he [Freeman] is allowed to make that decision. I guess they are afraid he ends up like RG III.He has always done a good job of either getting down or avoiding contact. Even if he matched the run totals that he did in 2010, the chances of him getting hit like RG3 did this past year would be pretty low, I would think.Hopefully the coaching staff re-evaluates their position on the subject, if they are in fact, telling him to stay in the pocket.
Quote from: The Anti-Java on January 16, 2013, 02:55:28 PMI wish someone would just ask Schiano or even Freeman, whats the deal with the no running allowed for #5.Something is going on, Schiano has commented on it a bit, but IIRC all he said was ....he [Freeman] is allowed to make that decision. I guess they are afraid he ends up like RG III.This has nothing to do with Rutgers. We were already talking about him not rushing in 2011 because Olson was trying to turn him into a pocket QB. If you look at the change it started in 2011. He has one game that year where he has 10 runs which skews the dataset. But for the most part you see him running abut two or three times fewer each game until the last few games.There is no fear of him getting RGIII'ed -- RGIII ran 120 times. Wilson ran over 90. Josh ran 39 times and almost half of those attempts came in just 3 games. Take away those three games (hey, if his apologists can pick and chose, why can't I?) and he has scrambled less than either of those scrambling devils, Tom Brady and Peyton Manning. He has just almost completely abandoned that part of his game.
There is no fear of him getting RGIII'ed -- RGIII ran 120 times. Wilson ran over 90. Josh ran 39 times and almost half of those attempts came in just 3 games. Take away those three games (hey, if his apologists can pick and chose, why can't I?) and he has scrambled less than either of those scrambling devils, Tom Brady and Peyton Manning. He has just almost completely abandoned that part of his game.
FRG is the most logical poster on this board. You guys just don\'t like where the logical conclusions take you.
If that winging-it stuff is the way it is for Josh (And you guys may very well be right) then it sounds like this is not the perfect offense for him. This offense sounds like it requires a lot of thought, and works better for a cerebral QB, which JF probably is not.
Who cares if he is running? I don't care if he runs for 10 yards all year. There is no correlation between running QBs and success.