Obama / FICA taxes: "how do you like me now?"

[olafberserker]

Now your plan is to insult everyone because you can't support anything you say ..... in the end it is rather sad really ...... but still funny as hell

The very fact that you think I haven't supported my argument in this thread speaks to your utterly mindless group mentality.

... says the admitted collectivist / socialist.


Thanks for the laughs , comrade.

Says the "free thinker" who always seems to be in perfect alignment with all of the other "free thinkers" on the message board. Yet another topic in which all you rugged individualist, non-conservatives, that require a complex political spectrum in which to categorize your various, wide ranging ideologies all agree on. How non-collectivist of you...

 

Actually, it's just that everyone has found something we can all agree on .......... 


We may have discovered the secret to world peace .... introduce all the players to cbw's posts

[Dolorous Jason]

Now your plan is to insult everyone because you can't support anything you say ..... in the end it is rather sad really ...... but still funny as hell

The very fact that you think I haven't supported my argument in this thread speaks to your utterly mindless group mentality.

... says the admitted collectivist / socialist.


Thanks for the laughs , comrade.

Says the "free thinker" who always seems to be in perfect alignment with all of the other "free thinkers" on the message board. Yet another topic in which all you rugged individualist, non-conservatives, that require a complex political spectrum in which to categorize your various, wide ranging ideologies all agree on. How non-collectivist of you...

 

Actually, it's just that everyone has found something we can all agree on .......... 


We may have discovered the secret to world peace .... introduce all the players to cbw's posts

It is definitely common ground for all.

The consensus generated in opposition to his his never-ending stupidity is almost ....fraternal ?

[CBWx2]

I'm the only thing you guys agree on? Now that's the best zinger of the day! Give these two a Kewpie Doll! They've earned it!

[Chief Joseph]

  You mad.

[spartan]

I think we are very close to the "You're a bunch of Nazis" phase.

[Dolorous Jason]

I think we are very close to the "You're a bunch of Nazis" phase.

But I thought we are all just conservatives anyway ?  That would require an expanding of his Political Spectrum For Dummies.

 


Nah , he's had a night to cool off . Now he will go back to his psuedo-intellectual shtick , and think he can google his way into sounding more knowledgeable about science than Illuminator.

[CBWx2]

Everyone uses Google to sound more knowledgeable about science than Illuminator, except for the people who don't. Don't you dare lecture me on Google use, poser!

[Chief Joseph]

No, he still mad.

[CBWx2]

No, he still mad.

Quite the contrary. I'm happy to continue exposing you. Either you aren't the social evolutionary scholar you profess to be, or you are, but have absolutely no qualms about twisting and contorting the rules of evolutionary theory to fit whatever political point you are trying to make. Either way, you are a fraud, and it would take a special group of idiots to applaud anything you've said here as being "knowledgeable". Lucky for you...

Now feel free to undress me with more of those deep, esoteric truths about evolution, like how all mammals live on land, except for the ones that don't.

[olafberserker]

D - Lusional

[John Galt?]

Here's another question for you. Two groups are vying for supremacy on a deserted island. One group (A) is comprised of two individuals who are fit and well nourished, and two individuals who live off of the scraps that are left by the other two. They only eat the leftovers, and when there are none, they don't eat at all. The other group (B) is made up of four individuals who equally share resources with one another. While none of them are as fit and well nourished as the two leaders of the other group, they are all far more nourished than the other two individuals in the other group. The two groups clash. Who wins supremacy of the island?

Group A does because at some point the hardest working and best hunting member of group B will realize the restraints of collectivism are holding him back and he will defect and immigrate to the less restrictive group A. Then the clash will be 5 vs 3, A wins.

[CBWx2]

Here's another question for you. Two groups are vying for supremacy on a deserted island. One group (A) is comprised of two individuals who are fit and well nourished, and two individuals who live off of the scraps that are left by the other two. They only eat the leftovers, and when there are none, they don't eat at all. The other group (B) is made up of four individuals who equally share resources with one another. While none of them are as fit and well nourished as the two leaders of the other group, they are all far more nourished than the other two individuals in the other group. The two groups clash. Who wins supremacy of the island?

Group A does because at some point the hardest working and best hunting member of group B will realize the restraints of collectivism are holding him back and he will defect and immigrate to the less restrictive group A. Then the clash will be 5 vs 3, A wins.

Wrong. Group B wins. The hardest working and best hunting member of group B will choose to maintain his current social order rather than risk being subjugated by the strong members of group A, while the two starving members of group A have absolutely no reason to maintain their current social order, thus will immigrate to group B. 6 vs 2, group B wins.

Yours is a nice story, but there is a history of human social behavior that suggests it is also a fallacy.

[Chief Joseph]

there is a history of me making up bullsh*t that suggests I have no clue what I'm talking about

Something we can all agree upon.

[spartan]

Here's another question for you. Two groups are vying for supremacy on a deserted island. One group is comprised of two individuals who are fit and well nourished, and two individuals who live off of the scraps that are left by the other two. They only eat the leftovers, and when there are none, they don't eat at all. The other group is made up of four individuals who equally share resources with one another. While none of them are as fit and well nourished as the two leaders of the other group, they are all far more nourished than the other two individuals in the other group. The two groups clash. Who wins supremacy of the island?

What if the 2 living off scraps in group A ae doing so because the couldn't be arsed to get off their ass and go hunting. Should the other 2 fit ones sacrifce their share of the food at their expense,  so the other 2 can get their fair share?

[Dolorous Jason]

Wrong. Group B wins. The hardest working and best hunting member of group B will choose to maintain his current social order rather than risk being subjugated by the strong members of group A, while the two starving members of group A have absolutely no reason to maintain their current social order, thus will immigrate to group B. 6 vs 2, group B wins.

How'd that work out for the Soviets during the Cold War , Comrade ?