Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
I want to see his shuttle run and 40 time at the combine , but I do like him.
Quote from: Dolorous Jason on January 15, 2013, 07:06:43 PMI want to see his shuttle run and 40 time at the combine , but I do like him.this right hereas an FSU or, as Chace would call me a homer, i like rhodes a great deal. ive seen him shutdown first round receivers and play the ball very well. i do not however advocate him at 13 right now until i see his true speed. he looks football fast but i dont know if he has the speed to cover a julio jones or a calvin johnson. if he tests well then im all for him at 13. i think hes worth it in the early 20s if we were to trade back. worst case scenario if hes not quick enough at corner he can definately play Free Safety. dont really want to spend the pick and then convert to safety but at least he wouldnt be a total waste of a pick
Quote from: Dolorous Jason on January 15, 2013, 07:06:43 PMI want to see his wonderlic score. That's all that matters.this right hereas an FSU or, as Chace would call me a homer, i like rhodes a great deal. ive seen him shutdown first round receivers and play the ball very well. i do not however advocate him at 13 right now until i see his true speed. he looks football fast but i dont know if he has the speed to cover a julio jones or a calvin johnson. if he tests well then im all for him at 13. i think hes worth it in the early 20s if we were to trade back. worst case scenario if hes not quick enough at corner he can definately play Free Safety. dont really want to spend the pick and then convert to safety but at least he wouldnt be a total waste of a pick
I want to see his wonderlic score. That's all that matters.
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.
I don't get how watching a guy do track and field in shorts and a t-shirt tells his "real speed". The combine is fun, but it has nothing to do with game speed. Gotta watch game film to gauge that.
Here are the stats by themselves for the three top prospects.Xavier- 112 solo tackles, 2 sacks, 8 ints, 0 tds, 31 pass deflects, and 1 forced fumble. (In three seasons in the Acc)Banks- 139 solo tackles, 4 sacks, 15 ints, 3 tds, 41 pass deflects, and 5 forced fumbles. (In four seasons in the SEC)Milliner- 89 solo tackles, 1 sack, 6 ints, 1 td, 41 pass deflects, and 2 forced fumbles (in three seasons in the SEC)Now, I'm not strictly a stat guy, but one of these guys numbers are obviously much better than the others. However, going by statistical breakdown, each have their own talents they bring. Banks has the advantage of playing a season longer. He was also injured, so that obviously cuts into his advantage a tad. Banks seemingly takes advantage of opportunities, not unlike our own barber. Xavier has only three seasons to Banks four, but he could play one more season, and he still, statistically speaking, wouldn't have more interceptions than Banks. Milliner and Banks are very similar in coverage apparently, as they both do indeed have the same number of pass deflects, however milliner had less time than banks.There is no way around it really. Banks is the superior corner if it weren't for the injury question mark IMO. However, all of them would benifet the bucs, so it doesn't matter. We should all be happy if we draft any one of them.
Quote from: Benchwarmer#1 on January 15, 2013, 10:11:23 PMHere are the stats by themselves for the three top prospects.Xavier- 112 solo tackles, 2 sacks, 8 ints, 0 tds, 31 pass deflects, and 1 forced fumble. (In three seasons in the Acc)Banks- 139 solo tackles, 4 sacks, 15 ints, 3 tds, 41 pass deflects, and 5 forced fumbles. (In four seasons in the SEC)Milliner- 89 solo tackles, 1 sack, 6 ints, 1 td, 41 pass deflects, and 2 forced fumbles (in three seasons in the SEC)Now, I'm not strictly a stat guy, but one of these guys numbers are obviously much better than the others. However, going by statistical breakdown, each have their own talents they bring. Banks has the advantage of playing a season longer. He was also injured, so that obviously cuts into his advantage a tad. Banks seemingly takes advantage of opportunities, not unlike our own barber. Xavier has only three seasons to Banks four, but he could play one more season, and he still, statistically speaking, wouldn't have more interceptions than Banks. Milliner and Banks are very similar in coverage apparently, as they both do indeed have the same number of pass deflects, however milliner had less time than banks.There is no way around it really. Banks is the superior corner if it weren't for the injury question mark IMO. However, all of them would benifet the bucs, so it doesn't matter. We should all be happy if we draft any one of them.lol really, comparing a defensive back with plain stats like that?at least bring in the number of times they were targeted, the number of times passes were completed on them, the passer rating against them if you were going to talk about defensive back stats