Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
I don't get how watching a guy do track and field in shorts and a t-shirt tells his "real speed". The combine is fun, but it has nothing to do with game speed. Gotta watch game film to gauge that.
but the game tape tells you everything you need to know.
Quote from: Benchwarmer#1 on January 15, 2013, 10:11:23 PMHere are the stats by themselves for the three top prospects.Xavier- 112 solo tackles, 2 sacks, 8 ints, 0 tds, 31 pass deflects, and 1 forced fumble. (In three seasons in the Acc)Banks- 139 solo tackles, 4 sacks, 15 ints, 3 tds, 41 pass deflects, and 5 forced fumbles. (In four seasons in the SEC)Milliner- 89 solo tackles, 1 sack, 6 ints, 1 td, 41 pass deflects, and 2 forced fumbles (in three seasons in the SEC)Now, I'm not strictly a stat guy, but one of these guys numbers are obviously much better than the others. However, going by statistical breakdown, each have their own talents they bring. Banks has the advantage of playing a season longer. He was also injured, so that obviously cuts into his advantage a tad. Banks seemingly takes advantage of opportunities, not unlike our own barber. Xavier has only three seasons to Banks four, but he could play one more season, and he still, statistically speaking, wouldn't have more interceptions than Banks. Milliner and Banks are very similar in coverage apparently, as they both do indeed have the same number of pass deflects, however milliner had less time than banks.There is no way around it really. Banks is the superior corner if it weren't for the injury question mark IMO. However, all of them would benifet the bucs, so it doesn't matter. We should all be happy if we draft any one of them.lol really, comparing a defensive back with plain stats like that?at least bring in the number of times they were targeted, the number of times passes were completed on them, the passer rating against them if you were going to talk about defensive back stats
Here are the stats by themselves for the three top prospects.Xavier- 112 solo tackles, 2 sacks, 8 ints, 0 tds, 31 pass deflects, and 1 forced fumble. (In three seasons in the Acc)Banks- 139 solo tackles, 4 sacks, 15 ints, 3 tds, 41 pass deflects, and 5 forced fumbles. (In four seasons in the SEC)Milliner- 89 solo tackles, 1 sack, 6 ints, 1 td, 41 pass deflects, and 2 forced fumbles (in three seasons in the SEC)Now, I'm not strictly a stat guy, but one of these guys numbers are obviously much better than the others. However, going by statistical breakdown, each have their own talents they bring. Banks has the advantage of playing a season longer. He was also injured, so that obviously cuts into his advantage a tad. Banks seemingly takes advantage of opportunities, not unlike our own barber. Xavier has only three seasons to Banks four, but he could play one more season, and he still, statistically speaking, wouldn't have more interceptions than Banks. Milliner and Banks are very similar in coverage apparently, as they both do indeed have the same number of pass deflects, however milliner had less time than banks.There is no way around it really. Banks is the superior corner if it weren't for the injury question mark IMO. However, all of them would benifet the bucs, so it doesn't matter. We should all be happy if we draft any one of them.
Quote from: JDouble on January 15, 2013, 10:49:53 PMI don't get how watching a guy do track and field in shorts and a t-shirt tells his "real speed". The combine is fun, but it has nothing to do with game speed. Gotta watch game film to gauge that.The combine is largely for the fans. It doesn't matter how much you can bench press or how fast you are in the 40. What matters is how the game tape looks. Do you have sufficient speed/strength for your position based on how you play? Can you separate on a crossing route? Can you engage, extend and shed an offensive lineman. Do you wrap up and drive when you tackle? Do you have the agility to adjust to a 10 yard curl and a stop and go route.Those are the things that matter and unfortunately many if not all of them cannot be really tested at the combine. I'm sure you'll agree Jdub, beware the prospect who shoots up the charts after a monster combine workout. There usually is a reason he's under the radar before, assuming he isn't a small school prospect.
Quote from: BucNY on January 16, 2013, 08:00:32 AMQuote from: JDouble on January 15, 2013, 10:49:53 PMI don't get how watching a guy do track and field in shorts and a t-shirt tells his "real speed". The combine is fun, but it has nothing to do with game speed. Gotta watch game film to gauge that.The combine is largely for the fans. It doesn't matter how much you can bench press or how fast you are in the 40. What matters is how the game tape looks. Do you have sufficient speed/strength for your position based on how you play? Can you separate on a crossing route? Can you engage, extend and shed an offensive lineman. Do you wrap up and drive when you tackle? Do you have the agility to adjust to a 10 yard curl and a stop and go route.Those are the things that matter and unfortunately many if not all of them cannot be really tested at the combine. I'm sure you'll agree Jdub, beware the prospect who shoots up the charts after a monster combine workout. There usually is a reason he's under the radar before, assuming he isn't a small school prospect.When you are talking about first round picks, the combine results matter very much for skill players.
Most important part of the combine are the interviews.
Quote from: Biggs3535 on January 16, 2013, 12:49:22 PMQuote from: BucNY on January 16, 2013, 08:00:32 AMQuote from: JDouble on January 15, 2013, 10:49:53 PMI don't get how watching a guy do track and field in shorts and a t-shirt tells his "real speed". The combine is fun, but it has nothing to do with game speed. Gotta watch game film to gauge that.The combine is largely for the fans. It doesn't matter how much you can bench press or how fast you are in the 40. What matters is how the game tape looks. Do you have sufficient speed/strength for your position based on how you play? Can you separate on a crossing route? Can you engage, extend and shed an offensive lineman. Do you wrap up and drive when you tackle? Do you have the agility to adjust to a 10 yard curl and a stop and go route.Those are the things that matter and unfortunately many if not all of them cannot be really tested at the combine. I'm sure you'll agree Jdub, beware the prospect who shoots up the charts after a monster combine workout. There usually is a reason he's under the radar before, assuming he isn't a small school prospect.When you are talking about first round picks, the combine results matter very much for skill players.You can watch all the tape you want, but its still good to get up close and personal with the players. See how they carry themselves. If your getting ready to invest millions in a guy, it might be a good idea to chat him up a bit.
They should change the name of the Combine to "NFL: Show and Tell"
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.