Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
BPA
Dom has stated before he doesn't like to draft OL really high, he finds guys like Penn, Dotson who still isnt a finished product yet...We def need to get competition for Dotson, possibly later in the draft or FA, I think in round 1 we need to go CB if it's not a reach or DE and if we trade down than grab Eifert, I really want a future at tight end and if we don't sign Bennett in FA I want Eifert, Ertz or Kelce from Cincy
not if we trade down, should of said that
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.
A lot of things will change between now and April. What is considered a reach now, may not be considered a reach then. Since Kiper is quoted here, when looking at his 1.0 last year...there were 11 players that were first round picks that were not even on Kiper's initial list. Of the ones on the list, Dennard was a 7th rounder and Burfict went undrafted. Poe, Cox, and Brockers were projected in the mid-late 20's and all 3 went between 11-14. Kuechly, Barron, and Floyd were all drafted at least 6 spots higher than originally projected.
Quote from: chace1986 on January 17, 2013, 02:10:44 AMA lot of things will change between now and April. What is considered a reach now, may not be considered a reach then. Since Kiper is quoted here, when looking at his 1.0 last year...there were 11 players that were first round picks that were not even on Kiper's initial list. Of the ones on the list, Dennard was a 7th rounder and Burfict went undrafted. Poe, Cox, and Brockers were projected in the mid-late 20's and all 3 went between 11-14. Kuechly, Barron, and Floyd were all drafted at least 6 spots higher than originally projected.I hear ya man, I view Kiper as entertainment value. But IMO, I don't view Rhodes as good value at #13. Don't get me wrong, I like him, but I think Dom could trade back a bit and score him later. Then pick up a couple picks for the trade back.
Quote from: The Anti-Java on January 17, 2013, 02:18:04 AMQuote from: chace1986 on January 17, 2013, 02:10:44 AMA lot of things will change between now and April. What is considered a reach now, may not be considered a reach then. Since Kiper is quoted here, when looking at his 1.0 last year...there were 11 players that were first round picks that were not even on Kiper's initial list. Of the ones on the list, Dennard was a 7th rounder and Burfict went undrafted. Poe, Cox, and Brockers were projected in the mid-late 20's and all 3 went between 11-14. Kuechly, Barron, and Floyd were all drafted at least 6 spots higher than originally projected.I hear ya man, I view Kiper as entertainment value. But IMO, I don't view Rhodes as good value at #13. Don't get me wrong, I like him, but I think Dom could trade back a bit and score him later. Then pick up a couple picks for the trade back.Oh yea. He is definitely there for entertainment, and the draft has turned into a huge event. Hell, more people watch the 1st round of the draft than watch the World Series and NBA Finals combined(average ratings of entire series). People who watch the NFL eat, drink, and sleep it. Right now, fans of 28 teams are tuned into their teams potential moves, just as much as they are to the remaining games. Most of ESPN insider subscriptions are sold to those wanting to see the Scouts Inc./Kiper/McShay info as well as various NFL rumors and draft coverage. I also believe that if NFL GMs wrote down a mock draft in January and also updated it 3-4 times before April, that it probably wouldn't be much more accurate than Kiper's. Kiper is definitely not 100%, but neither are NFL GMs/draft teams.