Welcome, Guest
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: Luke Kuechly: NFL Defensive Rookie of the Year! « previous next »
Page: 1 2 3 4 5

RiotHeart

****
Starter

Posts : 403
Offline
#30 : February 03, 2013, 04:25:06 PM

How shocking.   The guy I wanted in the first round ended up being defensive rookie of the year.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000134289/article/luke-kuechly-wins-defensive-rookie-of-the-year-honors

So you are saying Indy messed up, picking Luck over the ORoY ?

Considering Luck came in 2nd in the voting, I wouldn't say they "messed up".   Barron was NOWHERE to be seen in the voting...
Where was Tebow in voting his rookie season? Guess you hate him.

JavaRay

User is banned from postingMuted
******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 17206
Offline
#31 : February 03, 2013, 04:27:47 PM

Tebow wasn't the 8th overall pick in the draft.

Yet, he still did this.



Dude's a baller.


replica

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 2305
Offline
#32 : February 03, 2013, 04:29:15 PM

I'm not calling Barron average yet, he had a respectable rookie season

RiotHeart

****
Starter

Posts : 403
Offline
#33 : February 03, 2013, 04:29:23 PM

Tebow wasn't the 8th overall pick in the draft.

Yet, he still did this.



Dude's a baller.
Because no one thought he was worth it and seeing how he wasn't the OROY I guess they were right.

JavaRay

User is banned from postingMuted
******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 17206
Offline
#34 : February 03, 2013, 04:29:46 PM

Kuechly is the guy the Bucs could have taken in the first round and didn't.   They took loser Barron instead.   Anyone who thinks that was a good move is nothing but a liar homer.


replica

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 2305
Offline
#35 : February 03, 2013, 04:31:17 PM

A liar homer? Is this bait?

JavaRay

User is banned from postingMuted
******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 17206
Offline
#36 : February 03, 2013, 04:32:39 PM

Maybe can catch a small goldfish like the one Hate did?


JavaRay

User is banned from postingMuted
******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 17206
Offline
#37 : February 03, 2013, 04:33:15 PM

I"m just stating a fact.   Anyone who doesn't agree that they should have taken Kuechly over Barron is a liar homer.    There can be no other explanation.


RiotHeart

****
Starter

Posts : 403
Offline
#38 : February 03, 2013, 04:33:59 PM

A liar homer? Is this bait?

Benchwarmer#1

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 12303
Offline
#39 : February 03, 2013, 04:34:28 PM

A liar homer? Is this bait?

Everything the guy says is "bait."

It's really a shame PR soils their good name by supporting this nonsense.

captainjimbo

*****
Pro Bowler

Posts : 1271
Offline
#40 : February 03, 2013, 04:37:08 PM

It would have been awesome to have Kuechly and David as linebackers on the same D.    The Bucs desperately need a guy like Kuechly to lead this D.   He was sitting there are their pick and they took the 2nd best safety in the draft instead.

I have to agree it would be incredible to have Kuechly & David, that's an excellent point.

the Bucs don't have any leaders like Kuechly.   He would have been a huge difference maker on the Bucs D.    Barron is nothing special.
A little early in Barrons' career to make that statement.  I think Barron will be special in the future.

replica

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 2305
Offline
#41 : February 03, 2013, 04:37:22 PM

A liar homer? Is this bait?


That my friend is awesome!

JavaRay

User is banned from postingMuted
******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 17206
Offline
#42 : February 03, 2013, 04:40:21 PM

A liar homer? Is this bait?


That my friend is awesome!

So awesome that I don't even get it.   


JavaRay

User is banned from postingMuted
******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 17206
Offline
#43 : February 03, 2013, 04:41:15 PM

I think Barron will be special in the future.

Based on what?   


QaZ

*****
Pro Bowler

Posts : 1990
Offline
#44 : February 03, 2013, 05:05:05 PM

Kuechly is the guy the Bucs could have taken in the first round and didn't.   They took loser Barron instead.   Anyone who thinks that was a good move is nothing but a liar homer.

We knew we would get David a lot cheaper than Kuechly, while already having Foster. Trading down was part of this plan, maybe not getting the best out of our 7th pick is relative. Having Kuchly on the bench waching Foster and David play would have been a bigger waste than having an average Barron fill a hole at SS. Its not like our pass defense is above average and Barron was beat out by the guys already on our team. D Jackson did not even catch one single  pass in the NFL, Caddy is a FA.  Barron is one the best at his position on THIS team, those guys are not.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: Luke Kuechly: NFL Defensive Rookie of the Year! « previous next »
:

Hide Tools Show Tools