Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: Dolorous Jason on February 10, 2013, 09:22:19 AMQuote from: Al Bundy on February 10, 2013, 09:15:54 AMThere is no sense in arguing with anyone who has their flag stuck in the ground. I will be highly disappointed if Banks is the pick that high, especially if someone like Sheldon Richardson is on the board.If we needed an undertackle ,maybe. Drafting a NT that high when we had the #1 ranked rush defense last season would be the wasted pick. Learn what you are talking about , then come back and try again.We had that top ranked rush defense because the teams passed on us, exclusively. Sheldon Richardson is a MUCH better player than Banks is at his position.
Quote from: Al Bundy on February 10, 2013, 09:15:54 AMThere is no sense in arguing with anyone who has their flag stuck in the ground. I will be highly disappointed if Banks is the pick that high, especially if someone like Sheldon Richardson is on the board.If we needed an undertackle ,maybe. Drafting a NT that high when we had the #1 ranked rush defense last season would be the wasted pick. Learn what you are talking about , then come back and try again.
There is no sense in arguing with anyone who has their flag stuck in the ground. I will be highly disappointed if Banks is the pick that high, especially if someone like Sheldon Richardson is on the board.
An upgrade over Miller would help, especially on 3rd down. Having a NT that can not just eat blocks, but also get penetration and cause havoc, opens things up and provides more opportunities for our other pass rushers. Miller is decent at eating blocks, and he is pretty good at disengaging to tackle running backs, but he provides zero pass rush. He is a non factor on passing downs.
Quote from: JDouble on February 10, 2013, 09:41:28 AMAn upgrade over Miller would help, especially on 3rd down. Having a NT that can not just eat blocks, but also get penetration and cause havoc, opens things up and provides more opportunities for our other pass rushers. Miller is decent at eating blocks, and he is pretty good at disengaging to tackle running backs, but he provides zero pass rush. He is a non factor on passing downs.Never works out quite as good as it sounds like it will. See Booger McFarland. He never could make much of an impact at NT , and defense actually saw zero drop-off with Chartric Darby in the lineup.13 overall is to high to invest in that low impact position.
Why bother playing the game with this kid?Cut him. He sucks. He is vastly overpaid. Period. Stop over thinking.
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.
Quote from: Dolorous Jason on February 10, 2013, 10:18:35 AMQuote from: JDouble on February 10, 2013, 09:41:28 AMAn upgrade over Miller would help, especially on 3rd down. Having a NT that can not just eat blocks, but also get penetration and cause havoc, opens things up and provides more opportunities for our other pass rushers. Miller is decent at eating blocks, and he is pretty good at disengaging to tackle running backs, but he provides zero pass rush. He is a non factor on passing downs.Never works out quite as good as it sounds like it will. See Booger McFarland. He never could make much of an impact at NT , and defense actually saw zero drop-off with Chartric Darby in the lineup.13 overall is to high to invest in that low impact position.That is because Booger was average at best and Darby was as good or better. What is your point? Every 1st round NT will suck because Booger sucked? Great reasoning. But what if Sheldon ends up being a Haloti Ngata type player? Still think he has a low impact cause he is a NT? Look at the Williams duo that dominated in a 4-3 up in Minnesota for years. You get the right guy at NT and he'll have an impact. Besides just having an upgrade over Miller, we need better depth on the interior defensive line. We have McCoy and.......nothing. DT is a huge need this offseason.
Cutting him now also increases the leverage of whoever we may be in pursuit of
Quote from: JDouble on February 10, 2013, 10:27:11 AMQuote from: Dolorous Jason on February 10, 2013, 10:18:35 AMQuote from: JDouble on February 10, 2013, 09:41:28 AMAn upgrade over Miller would help, especially on 3rd down. Having a NT that can not just eat blocks, but also get penetration and cause havoc, opens things up and provides more opportunities for our other pass rushers. Miller is decent at eating blocks, and he is pretty good at disengaging to tackle running backs, but he provides zero pass rush. He is a non factor on passing downs.Never works out quite as good as it sounds like it will. See Booger McFarland. He never could make much of an impact at NT , and defense actually saw zero drop-off with Chartric Darby in the lineup.13 overall is to high to invest in that low impact position.That is because Booger was average at best and Darby was as good or better. What is your point? Every 1st round NT will suck because Booger sucked? Great reasoning. But what if Sheldon ends up being a Haloti Ngata type player? Still think he has a low impact cause he is a NT? Look at the Williams duo that dominated in a 4-3 up in Minnesota for years. You get the right guy at NT and he'll have an impact. Besides just having an upgrade over Miller, we need better depth on the interior defensive line. We have McCoy and.......nothing. DT is a huge need this offseason.Ngata plays in a 3-4 , and the WIlliams boys were run stuffers.NT most likely ain't happening at 13 , so you might as well get over it.
Quote from: Dolorous Jason on February 10, 2013, 11:33:41 AMQuote from: JDouble on February 10, 2013, 10:27:11 AMQuote from: Dolorous Jason on February 10, 2013, 10:18:35 AMQuote from: JDouble on February 10, 2013, 09:41:28 AMAn upgrade over Miller would help, especially on 3rd down. Having a NT that can not just eat blocks, but also get penetration and cause havoc, opens things up and provides more opportunities for our other pass rushers. Miller is decent at eating blocks, and he is pretty good at disengaging to tackle running backs, but he provides zero pass rush. He is a non factor on passing downs.Never works out quite as good as it sounds like it will. See Booger McFarland. He never could make much of an impact at NT , and defense actually saw zero drop-off with Chartric Darby in the lineup.13 overall is to high to invest in that low impact position.That is because Booger was average at best and Darby was as good or better. What is your point? Every 1st round NT will suck because Booger sucked? Great reasoning. But what if Sheldon ends up being a Haloti Ngata type player? Still think he has a low impact cause he is a NT? Look at the Williams duo that dominated in a 4-3 up in Minnesota for years. You get the right guy at NT and he'll have an impact. Besides just having an upgrade over Miller, we need better depth on the interior defensive line. We have McCoy and.......nothing. DT is a huge need this offseason.Ngata plays in a 3-4 , and the WIlliams boys were run stuffers.NT most likely ain't happening at 13 , so you might as well get over it.Banks isn't happening at 13.. might as well get over it.
IMO, Banks and Rhodes will be just as good, if not better CBs, than Milliner. I'd be fine if we took either at 13 if a trade back partner can't be found.