Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Pat Williams and Kevin Williams were just run stuffers? Pat blew up the line and was as disruptive as it gets, which allowed Kevin to average 9 sacks a year for the seven years they were teamed up. Even Ray Edwards useless ass averaged 7 sacks a year while playing on that line.....and Jared Allen didn't get there until the very end, so don't try to say he's the reason. Bottomline is Pat Williams made everyone on that line better. Dominant NTs are difference makers. Zone cornerbacks in a man coverage scheme are not. Get over it.
An upgrade over Miller would help, especially on 3rd down. Having a NT that can not just eat blocks, but also get penetration and cause havoc, opens things up and provides more opportunities for our other pass rushers. Miller is decent at eating blocks, and he is pretty good at disengaging to tackle running backs, but he provides zero pass rush. He is a non factor on passing downs.
Quote from: JDouble on February 10, 2013, 09:41:28 AMAn upgrade over Miller would help, especially on 3rd down. Having a NT that can not just eat blocks, but also get penetration and cause havoc, opens things up and provides more opportunities for our other pass rushers. Miller is decent at eating blocks, and he is pretty good at disengaging to tackle running backs, but he provides zero pass rush. He is a non factor on passing downs.If third down (and presumably obvious passing situations) is the concern, then there is no concern seeing as Miller comes off the field on those plays anyway in favor of Bennett sliding over or Bowers coming in lined 3T.If depth is the issue, then there are a few rotational passrushing types that may be available via FA in Henry Melton, Glenn Dorsey, Jason Jones, Randy Starks, Arthur Jones, etc.
This forum is as fickle as a 16 year old girl. Wright screwed up, he voided his contract. He is currently our best CB on the roster, we're not going to just cut him and tell him to pack his crap. We'll try to renegotiate him to a more realistic contract. I believe we do want him on our team still. If he is unwilling to sign a new contract with us, then he'll be gone. All signs point to him still wanting to be a Buccaneer and it's not a one strike and your gone deal.
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.
Quote from: Dolorous Jason on February 10, 2013, 09:22:19 AMQuote from: Al Bundy on February 10, 2013, 09:15:54 AMThere is no sense in arguing with anyone who has their flag stuck in the ground. I will be highly disappointed if Banks is the pick that high, especially if someone like Sheldon Richardson is on the board.If we needed an undertackle ,maybe. Drafting a NT that high when we had the #1 ranked rush defense last season would be the wasted pick. Learn what you are talking about , then come back and try again.We had that top ranked rush defense because the teams passed on us.
Quote from: Al Bundy on February 10, 2013, 09:15:54 AMThere is no sense in arguing with anyone who has their flag stuck in the ground. I will be highly disappointed if Banks is the pick that high, especially if someone like Sheldon Richardson is on the board.If we needed an undertackle ,maybe. Drafting a NT that high when we had the #1 ranked rush defense last season would be the wasted pick. Learn what you are talking about , then come back and try again.
There is no sense in arguing with anyone who has their flag stuck in the ground. I will be highly disappointed if Banks is the pick that high, especially if someone like Sheldon Richardson is on the board.
Quote from: BucNY on February 11, 2013, 08:58:54 AMThis forum is as fickle as a 16 year old girl. Wright screwed up, he voided his contract. He is currently our best CB on the roster, we're not going to just cut him and tell him to pack his crap. We'll try to renegotiate him to a more realistic contract. I believe we do want him on our team still. If he is unwilling to sign a new contract with us, then he'll be gone. All signs point to him still wanting to be a Buccaneer and it's not a one strike and your gone deal...and it seems that you see about as much Bucs football games as a fickle 16 year old girl. It's not just about Wright's screw up(s). When he was actually on the field last year, he was not very good. We should absolutely send him packing. It was an awful deal for a player that wasn't even worth the one year $3.5mil deal that Detroit gave him. It's time to take off the homer glasses and realize that not every move the Bucs make is a good one. Franchise's make player personnel mistakes every year, and it wouldn't make you any less of a fan boy to admit that they should cut bait. The universe has given Dom a great opportunity to fix one of his many FA shortcomings. Hopefully he jumps at the opportunity.http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/nfl/news/20130208/tampa-bay-buccaneers-offseason-preview/?sct=hp_t11_a6&eref=sihp#In the line under the picture that opens up ^this^ SI article, it reads: "No one struggled more for the Bucs' league-worst pass defense than cornerback Eric Wright."Pretty much.