Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: Jutt on February 12, 2013, 10:00:15 PMQuote from: jerseybucsfan on February 12, 2013, 09:48:53 PMBennett is overrated, but Cook is underrated.How is Bennett overrated? Hes a great blocker and has shined as a receiver now that hes gotten a chance.65 catches between 2009 and 2011 without a td. Good player, but not sure he is better than Cook, who can likely be had for less.
Quote from: jerseybucsfan on February 12, 2013, 09:48:53 PMBennett is overrated, but Cook is underrated.How is Bennett overrated? Hes a great blocker and has shined as a receiver now that hes gotten a chance.
Bennett is overrated, but Cook is underrated.
Quote from: jerseybucsfan on February 12, 2013, 11:03:18 PMQuote from: Jutt on February 12, 2013, 10:00:15 PMQuote from: jerseybucsfan on February 12, 2013, 09:48:53 PMBennett is overrated, but Cook is underrated.How is Bennett overrated? Hes a great blocker and has shined as a receiver now that hes gotten a chance.65 catches between 2009 and 2011 without a td. Good player, but not sure he is better than Cook, who can likely be had for less.See this is the problem when you only look at stats. Dude barely got the ball in Dallas behind Witten.
Quote from: Jutt on February 12, 2013, 11:58:32 PMQuote from: jerseybucsfan on February 12, 2013, 11:03:18 PMQuote from: Jutt on February 12, 2013, 10:00:15 PMQuote from: jerseybucsfan on February 12, 2013, 09:48:53 PMBennett is overrated, but Cook is underrated.How is Bennett overrated? Hes a great blocker and has shined as a receiver now that hes gotten a chance.65 catches between 2009 and 2011 without a td. Good player, but not sure he is better than Cook, who can likely be had for less.See this is the problem when you only look at stats. Dude barely got the ball in Dallas behind Witten.65 catches without a touchdown is hardly an irrelevant number. And that doesn't really qualify as hardly ever when it comes to backup tight ends. Cook was getting thrown to by Jake Locker. If Cook is a few mill cheaper per season, I'd go for Cook.
Quote from: bucs449 on February 12, 2013, 10:23:27 PMQuote from: The Anti-Java on February 12, 2013, 09:18:40 PMThe other Bennett would be my first choice. Good size and still young.Well, according the the article, the Cowboys took him in 1998 so he's old as **CENSORED** haha. Seriously though, I think if the Bucs could get him on the same team as Michael, that will take the laziness concerns out of the question. The brothers will push each other and we have seen how much of a team first guy Michael is. I would say the Bucs should look into doubling up with TEs, either two in FA or 1 FA and 1 Draft. They should also let Clark walk, cut Stocker, and roll with Bynum as the 3rd TE, who honestly was the #1 run blocking TE on the team last year.Conjecture as to the work ethic. As for Stocker, I disagree. Give him one more year. Like what I saw in Week 17.
Quote from: The Anti-Java on February 12, 2013, 09:18:40 PMThe other Bennett would be my first choice. Good size and still young.Well, according the the article, the Cowboys took him in 1998 so he's old as **CENSORED** haha. Seriously though, I think if the Bucs could get him on the same team as Michael, that will take the laziness concerns out of the question. The brothers will push each other and we have seen how much of a team first guy Michael is. I would say the Bucs should look into doubling up with TEs, either two in FA or 1 FA and 1 Draft. They should also let Clark walk, cut Stocker, and roll with Bynum as the 3rd TE, who honestly was the #1 run blocking TE on the team last year.
The other Bennett would be my first choice. Good size and still young.
Myers looked pretty good this year. Was he the guy who completely burned Myron Lewis in the redzone, or was that a fullback?