Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: nitey on March 04, 2013, 09:22:50 AMI think it's unfair to say that Freeman doesn't have intangibles, because he certainly does, the problem is that he doesn't have enough of the one's that you need to be considered a franchise quarterback. Free certainly is better than quite a few quarterbacks in the league, but his problem, at least to me, is that he doesn't always remain cool under pressure. There are times that he does and that's when he does look like a franchise quarterback, however, there are also times when he feels pressure (existent or non-existent) and throws a horrible pick. I think this was the main reason we got Nicks last year and why we might consider a right tackle candidate in the first round this year. I don't think it was a coincidence that when Freeman had confidence in his front line to protect him, his QB rating was over 100 and as he lost confidence, his ratings fell and his INT-TD ratio increased negatively.Few quarterbacks out work Freeman, so the effort is there, Sullivan has called Freeman very coach-able and football smart, so he knows and understands defenses and the offensive playbook. The offensive players indicate that he has good leadership skills. IMO Freeman is the type of quarterback that will get better as he gets older, I'm just not sure if the Bucs can afford to continue to be patient with him. He's certainly a good enough quarterback that you can win with if the rest of the team is solid around him.This^^^^^for the most part. I find it strange that Freeman played some of his best games in 2010 behind a patchwork OL that included guys off the street. IIRC the Bucs lost 9 starters off the youngest team in the league that year. The lockout season sucked because most of the team simply quit. Freeman didn't, but no QB could have carried that bunch. Last year was streaky, but too many here ignore the good and focus on the bad. I'm confident 2013 will be his best season. The defense may not be top 10 but they'll be close. Freeman will eliminate half of his turnovers and that alone will be enough to get them in the playoffs. The haters will back off a little bit and Josh will get paid. We won't play in the SB, but we will have a hand in determining who does. Our turn is coming, and Schiano and Freeman will be major factors.
I think it's unfair to say that Freeman doesn't have intangibles, because he certainly does, the problem is that he doesn't have enough of the one's that you need to be considered a franchise quarterback. Free certainly is better than quite a few quarterbacks in the league, but his problem, at least to me, is that he doesn't always remain cool under pressure. There are times that he does and that's when he does look like a franchise quarterback, however, there are also times when he feels pressure (existent or non-existent) and throws a horrible pick. I think this was the main reason we got Nicks last year and why we might consider a right tackle candidate in the first round this year. I don't think it was a coincidence that when Freeman had confidence in his front line to protect him, his QB rating was over 100 and as he lost confidence, his ratings fell and his INT-TD ratio increased negatively.Few quarterbacks out work Freeman, so the effort is there, Sullivan has called Freeman very coach-able and football smart, so he knows and understands defenses and the offensive playbook. The offensive players indicate that he has good leadership skills. IMO Freeman is the type of quarterback that will get better as he gets older, I'm just not sure if the Bucs can afford to continue to be patient with him. He's certainly a good enough quarterback that you can win with if the rest of the team is solid around him.
Some pretty good QB's on that list. As of right now, I don't think Free has the intangibles. Hopefully he can show he does, and make me wrong, in the 2013 season.
This year is going to be a big deal... and a primary reason if I'm the organization, I'm not working a deal until he takes that ultimate next step.I'm backing the guy. I want him to succeed.
Chubby Freeman had the intangibles, swag, mojo, balls, whatever you want to call it. What happened to that guy?
Quote from: youngone on March 04, 2013, 12:34:58 PMChubby Freeman had the intangibles, swag, mojo, balls, whatever you want to call it. What happened to that guy?Its what they put in the food at Taco Bell at 3AM. Call them and ask for their secret! Get it down to OBP pronto!!
Quote from: BucBalla85 on March 04, 2013, 12:40:47 PMQuote from: youngone on March 04, 2013, 12:34:58 PMChubby Freeman had the intangibles, swag, mojo, balls, whatever you want to call it. What happened to that guy?Its what they put in the food at Taco Bell at 3AM. Call them and ask for their secret! Get it down to OBP pronto!!I'm thinking about just mailing boxes of those Doritos locos tacos to OBP. We would be playoff if he gets that 25 lbs and the fro back.
Did Christian Ponder have everything you look for? No, but he had some leadership to him. I’m not surprised he went in the first round. Minnesota got comfortable with the leader. That’s a valuable trait, over the arm strength.How's that working out?