Hmmmm - what kind of settlement?http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000151144/article/eric-wrights-grievance-over-contract-denied-by-arbitrator
A grievance filed by Tampa Bay Buccaneers cornerback Eric Wright to challenge the voiding of his contract guarantee for 2013 has been denied, according to a ruling obtained by NFL Network and NFL.com. Shyam Das was the arbitrator in the ruling, which was issued on Tuesday.
The Buccaneers won the ruling, which means they no longer have to pay Wright the $7.75 million guaranteed in his contract for 2013. They also have no obligation to make a decision any time soon, meaning they could let the issue linger until the start of training camp.
Wright was suspended four games during the 2012 season for violating the NFL's performance-enhancing drug policy. The Bucs believed that because he "failed to practice and play," his skill, injury, and salary-cap guarantees for 2013 have been rendered "null and void." Wright and the NFL Players Association contend that no provision in Wright's contract permits that, saying that only the policy prevented him from practicing. The contract did contain some wiggle room, but the ruling stated "the clause in issue is broadly worded" enough to lead to the ruling.The two sides attempted to reach a settlement, but could not come to a decision
. In the end, the Bucs' stance was upheld