Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
But if the Offense could have scored more than 9 freakin points, and maybe sustained a drive for more than 3 or 4 plays, we wouldn't have had a worn out D trying to cover the leagues best offense in the 100+ degree heat! The D did what was expected of them. They created opportunity after opportunity. The O failed to deliver. Any D would be worn out by the 4th quarter under these circumstances. You can't fault them for it, really.
considering the Defense got almost NO support from the Offense all day, what exactly did you expect to happen? a shut out? Those guys were gassed by the 4th quarter and it showed. give em a break.
Westbrook is a terrific player. The worst part of the whole thing is that Gruden is still torn up that the Rich McKay so-called "braintrust" in 2002 completely disregarded his pleas to draft Westbrook in the 3rd round and instead drafted Marquis Walker.And you wonder why Gruden wasn't happy with Rich McKay and his cronies.
Jesus Christ! Â Some of you act like you don't know a damn thing about football! Â 4 forced turnovers against one of the best offenses in the league IS WITHOUT A DOUBT an impressive effort. Â If you can't see that, you're a moron. Â All some of you wanna do is focus on the 4th quarter. Â Yes, the D gave up hella yards and 3 TDs. Â But if the Offense could have scored more than 9 freakin points, and maybe sustained a drive for more than 3 or 4 plays, we wouldn't have had a worn out D trying to cover the leagues best offense in the 100+ degree heat! Â The D did what was expected of them. Â They created opportunity after opportunity. Â The O failed to deliver. Â Any D would be worn out by the 4th quarter under these circumstances. Â You can't fault them for it, really.
Amen. Finally, a reasonable post!
Quote from: Buck It on October 23, 2006, 02:52:39 PMBut if the Offense could have scored more than 9 freakin points, and maybe sustained a drive for more than 3 or 4 plays, we wouldn't have had a worn out D trying to cover the leagues best offense in the 100+ degree heat! The D did what was expected of them. They created opportunity after opportunity. The O failed to deliver. Any D would be worn out by the 4th quarter under these circumstances. You can't fault them for it, really.Worn out by the 4th quarter? The offense took the opening kickoff in the second half, after the defense had rested for 12 minutes at halftime, and promptly put together a drive that took 8 minutes off the game clock. 8 minutes of game time and about 20 minutes of real time. The Bucs defense rested for more than a half an hour before the Eagles took over and promptly ran up 21 points in less than a quarter and a half.In the second half, the Bucs offense had drives of 8 minutes, 6 minutes, 2 and a half minutes, and 30 seconds. That's 17 minutes of clock time versus 13 for the Eagles.From 5:19 seconds left in the 3rd quarter until the end of the game, the Buccaneers defense gave up almost 240 yards on only THREE drives. Three drives. If the Bucs defense was worn out in the fourth quarter, it wasn't because the offense was going 3-and-out at that point, it was because the Bucs defense couldn't get themselves off the field.
Stop making sense.The only defensive peromance this year that was for 60 minutes was the Bengals game. With that said if Monte can figured out how to have them playing sixty minutes like they did in the first half against the Eagles then things are loooking good.
Besides Ronde... They defence sucked. Espiecally the D-ends.