Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
It is clear you really haven't been paying attention at all. I didn't say Gradkowski played great the past two games. What he did, however, is make a few key plays when a few key plays were necessary. He needs to improve his passing and get closer to that 70% completion percentage he enjoyed in college.And nothing you can say regading Gradkowski can make me angry. I am not emotionally invested in the guy. He's the QB of choice right now, he was almost the starter on opening day, but if he doesn't work out he'll be replaced -- and that's how it should be. I think he'll do fine in the long run, but if he starts to stink up the joint like Simms did before he went out, then dump him. Fast.I'm loyal to my favorite team, not individual players. I want the best fit at every position, every week. Even icons like Brooks have to be considered for replacement at some point.
Gannon had an All Pro line, good running backs in GArner and Wheatley (at the time), Jerry Rice, Tim BRown, and Jerry Porter.Big difference.
Quote from: bradentonian on October 24, 2006, 04:32:01 PM4th quarter comebacks are not always a good sign. That means you are not getting it done for 3 quarters.BAM!Winner!
4th quarter comebacks are not always a good sign. That means you are not getting it done for 3 quarters.
And after four games, we will get a better picture of how Grads "fits" into the WCO.
But the passes are wild and bad, nothing to do with him being a rook.
Say what you want about Grads but he has added a spark to the whole team. It's clear he has all the intangibles to be very good. Now he has to go through the learning curve of a rookie which will probably be more bad days than good. Eventually, he will be very good, but it's going to take a few games at least. It's also obvious, Gruden thinks this guy has everything it takes to be his QB for a long time.
Quote from: OpTiOnMaStA on October 24, 2006, 03:44:50 PMQuote from: Boid Fink on October 24, 2006, 03:41:02 PMGradkowski = Manager.King = Manager.Simms = resigned.You're crazy. King = had a great rushing offense. We have a good one now, but we are going to need to lean on Gradkowski down the stretch.And Gradkowski, in theory, should have a great rushing offense. Right?Pittman, Caddy, and Alstott.Pittman, Dunn, and Alstott.
Quote from: Boid Fink on October 24, 2006, 03:41:02 PMGradkowski = Manager.King = Manager.Simms = resigned.You're crazy. King = had a great rushing offense. We have a good one now, but we are going to need to lean on Gradkowski down the stretch.
Gradkowski = Manager.King = Manager.Simms = resigned.
Boid wrote:Grads passes need work. It isn't about his timing, or his reading ability, or knowledge of the offense. It is flat out about his physical tools. Does he have enough of an arm top make things happen at the pro level? So far, the verdict is out on that one.We all know that. But you are 100% wrong about it not being about his timing, reading ability or knowledge of the offense.All of those things affect his game and he his learning all of those things at once. If he's constantly thinking about what todo, it WILL affect his accuracy. And his arm strength is fine from what I see. Those who say he has a noodle arm are notwatching the same guy that I have seen.
Quote from: ufojoe55 on October 24, 2006, 09:20:51 PMBoid wrote:Grads passes need work. It isn't about his timing, or his reading ability, or knowledge of the offense. It is flat out about his physical tools. Does he have enough of an arm top make things happen at the pro level? So far, the verdict is out on that one.We all know that. But you are 100% wrong about it not being about his timing, reading ability or knowledge of the offense.All of those things affect his game and he his learning all of those things at once. If he's constantly thinking about what todo, it WILL affect his accuracy. And his arm strength is fine from what I see. Those who say he has a noodle arm are notwatching the same guy that I have seen.Well I respectfully disagree.I have watched the last two games, and his arm looked weak. And not very accurate.But things can change, he is bound to play better. I am not a Grads basher, I am a Grads observer. These are things we have all seen from him. His first game was spectacular. His last two were "meh". If you didn't watch them UFO, you really should go back and check them out.I am hoping he works out, why not? I just am writing in direct observation to what I have seen. Some of his passes were Mitch Williams like.
Boid, I hae seen 7 of 8 quarters of the last two games. I just don't see what you see.I see a rookie who is trying hard not to make a mistake and learning all the ins andouts of being an NFL QB. Once he's comfortable at the position, then we can reallysee what kind of QB he will be. I'm assuming he will improve like most rookies dowoth time. If not, he'll be gone.