Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
JT or go Defense,
Quote from: Uncle Stan on April 11, 2007, 08:52:52 AMBut a franchise left tackle (as a final piece to the puzzle) can.But we're not one player away from contending. And it's not like you're getting a top tier LT in his prime that has proven to be a great player. You're getting a rookie, who knows if he can do well against bigger and stronger DE's. (BTW I'm indifferent as to who I want to see picked, I like both JT and CJ)
But a franchise left tackle (as a final piece to the puzzle) can.
If JT is gone and CJ is there, then you take CJ.
Quote from: m~j~s on April 11, 2007, 10:53:26 AMIf JT is gone and CJ is there, then you take CJ. CJ should only be an option is Quinn, Russel and JT are off the board.
Quote from: MVP on April 10, 2007, 04:42:45 PM The Buccaneers need thise extra picks because they need players for an aging defense. That is why trading up for any player would be counterproductive to rebuilding the team. That is were your logic is flawed. Flawed? in what way? Having extra picks guarantees no more of a successful draft than having a top 5 pick. We had 22 picks the last 2 years. 22 PICKS. Thats 8 more picks than most teams have had. How many out of those 22 are gonna stick?Caddy - He's one year away from being a bust, 2 years and 7 TD's aint gettin it done palAlex Smith- decent player, nothing that scares any defense, but an okay average TEMaurice Stovall - A #3 WR at best, he'll be lucky to be in the NFL in 4 years from nowJermey Trueblood - Jurys still out on the guy, picked way to high. could flip a coin on himDavin Joseph - Best pick we made in 5 yearsSo outta those 22 players, I see basically 2 starters that are good players. Joseph and SmithHopefully Caddy and Trueblood pan out.Te rest of the draft, those guys will not have careers in the NFL. You're trying to sit here and tell me you wouldnt trade 3-4 picks to moveup and get one of the best players at his position to ever come out?Calvin Johnson is better than every single pick we've made the last 2 years. And If I could trade Caddy, Clayton and Trueblood for Calvin Johnson I'd do it in a second. Calvin Johnson > our last 22 picks. And it aint even closeQuote from: dalbuc on April 10, 2007, 08:54:19 PMHere's the simple answer:What do the Faders, Lions, Browns and Bucs all have in common - explosive skill players Would you care to share with the rest of us on who exactlly do we have that is explosive? Cause I cant find one player that is. Calvin Johnson would be tho'
The Buccaneers need thise extra picks because they need players for an aging defense. That is why trading up for any player would be counterproductive to rebuilding the team. That is were your logic is flawed.
Here's the simple answer:What do the Faders, Lions, Browns and Bucs all have in common - explosive skill players
Would you care to share with the rest of us on who exactlly do we have that is explosive? Cause I cant find one player that is. Calvin Johnson would be tho'
Actually we've run the math on this one, and having extra picks increases your odds. Dal even posted an analysis from Dartmouth on the success rates round by round. I can't find the link for that but maybe he'll post it again...