Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: dalbuc on May 14, 2007, 10:41:32 AMQuote from: thedeej3000 on May 14, 2007, 10:36:58 AMI don't see Simms not on this team unless maybe Jake shows up. Gruden has lamented the fact that they were so inexperienced at QB last year. I don't see him backing up Garcia with a second year player and an UDFA.That second year player grossly outplayed Simms last year. Would you trust simms with the helm of the bobsled?Grossly outplayed? That's just Simms hatred spewing. I think some of you fans grossly underestimated the Ravens, and had that game chalked up as a win when the schedule came out. Even after they signed McNair the average fan thought he was washed up, and still wrote win next to Baltimore on the schedule. When the Buccs got schooled, you all needed to find someone to blame. You chose Simms. I'm sure it's Simms' fault the Buccs gave up 300 yards rushing to Atlanta? I know I saw Simms pull out a knife and cut his own spleen out during Carolina...no it wasn't the Line's fault.
Quote from: thedeej3000 on May 14, 2007, 10:36:58 AMI don't see Simms not on this team unless maybe Jake shows up. Gruden has lamented the fact that they were so inexperienced at QB last year. I don't see him backing up Garcia with a second year player and an UDFA.That second year player grossly outplayed Simms last year. Would you trust simms with the helm of the bobsled?
I don't see Simms not on this team unless maybe Jake shows up. Gruden has lamented the fact that they were so inexperienced at QB last year. I don't see him backing up Garcia with a second year player and an UDFA.
We got to get better at doing something, and that is what we have to set our focus on and that is something to get better at. That\\\\\\\'s what we are trying to do right now.
Grossly outplayed?
Quote from: ABuccsFan on May 14, 2007, 11:00:47 AMGrossly outplayed? Yeah, find me another starting QB with as bad a TD:INT ratio as Simms. Boo-hoo the Ravens have a tough defense, well they're on the schedule. The Birds have an awful pass D so he should have feasted on that. He didn't - 0 Td's and 3 INTs, 53% completion.Simms 4th year player 1 TD, 7 INTGrads Rookie player 9TD, 9 INTRookie QB's are awful so to be so much worse than the rookie says a lot about who Simms is.
the ravens have a terrible pass defense? last time i checked chris mccallister, ed reed and samari rolle played in the raven's secondary. but you know, they're all terrible
Quote from: BIG JLB on May 14, 2007, 11:48:55 AMthe ravens have a terrible pass defense? last time i checked chris mccallister, ed reed and samari rolle played in the raven's secondary. but you know, they're all terrible Ravens have a tough pass defense, the Birds (aka the Falcons) don't and Simms sucked the pipe vs them as well so apparently the quality of opposition wasn't his excuse.
Quote from: dalbuc on May 14, 2007, 11:51:26 AMQuote from: BIG JLB on May 14, 2007, 11:48:55 AMthe ravens have a terrible pass defense? last time i checked chris mccallister, ed reed and samari rolle played in the raven's secondary. but you know, they're all terrible Ravens have a tough pass defense, the Birds (aka the Falcons) don't and Simms sucked the pipe vs them as well so apparently the quality of opposition wasn't his excuse.You can't pass the ball from your back. Nice skewed stat once a gain. I don't care if you put Jesuit High school's secondary behind the Falcons front 7, Simms can't throw from his back or with 300 lb lineman in his face.
Quote from: dalbuc on May 14, 2007, 11:31:55 AMQuote from: ABuccsFan on May 14, 2007, 11:00:47 AMGrossly outplayed? Yeah, find me another starting QB with as bad a TD:INT ratio as Simms. Boo-hoo the Ravens have a tough defense, well they're on the schedule. The Birds have an awful pass D so he should have feasted on that. He didn't - 0 Td's and 3 INTs, 53% completion.Simms 4th year player 1 TD, 7 INTGrads Rookie player 9TD, 9 INTRookie QB's are awful so to be so much worse than the rookie says a lot about who Simms is.Simms 3rd year NFC South Championship
I love the Simms excuse factory. He couldn't win against a great Raven's D? Since you think the D is that important then he can't take the credit for winning with the best D in the league in 05 -- obviously the other team never stood a chance.You look at 06 and its 1:7 vs. 9:9. There's no excuse for that. Grads played some pretty tough houses too, and overall looked better than Simms this year. Wan't to look at 05? it's a 10:7 ratio for Simms, who was already in his third year. At the very BEST you can say that is a silghtly/somewhat better performance than 06 Grads. I'm sure it didn't hurt to have the #1D and a solid running game either.With a better performing team around him in 05, Simms was only able to play a little better than Grads did with crap around him. Once the team stopped performing around him in 06, the real Simms appeared -- a 4th year guy who was outplayed by a rookie with worse physical tools.And I like this one too:Quote from: ABuccsFan on May 14, 2007, 01:32:45 PMQuote from: dalbuc on May 14, 2007, 11:51:26 AMQuote from: BIG JLB on May 14, 2007, 11:48:55 AMthe ravens have a terrible pass defense? last time i checked chris mccallister, ed reed and samari rolle played in the raven's secondary. but you know, they're all terrible Ravens have a tough pass defense, the Birds (aka the Falcons) don't and Simms sucked the pipe vs them as well so apparently the quality of opposition wasn't his excuse.You can't pass the ball from your back. Nice skewed stat once a gain. I don't care if you put Jesuit High school's secondary behind the Falcons front 7, Simms can't throw from his back or with 300 lb lineman in his face.Skewed stat? If you're making the case that it was the Raven's tough D that stopped him from being the stud you know he is, then you have to believe that he's do well against a weak pass D. But he didn't, did he? I suppose rather than face the fact that your logic is seriously flawed it's easier to accuse Dal of being the one to twist things around. And I suppose Grads never had to deal with bad line play? No I forgot the Simmian storyline -- the team and coach were to blame for Simms looking so bad, but after he got hurt they magically started playing better around Grads, so Grads never had to play through a bad D crap running and weak line. Simmians need to face facts. The fact that their performances are even remotely close is a pretty good indicator that Simms sucks. For a 4th year guy to play worse (or, in the homers case -- just as poorly) as a rookie is inexcuseable.
Quote from: ABuccsFan on May 14, 2007, 01:29:52 PMQuote from: dalbuc on May 14, 2007, 11:31:55 AMQuote from: ABuccsFan on May 14, 2007, 11:00:47 AMGrossly outplayed? Yeah, find me another starting QB with as bad a TD:INT ratio as Simms. Boo-hoo the Ravens have a tough defense, well they're on the schedule. The Birds have an awful pass D so he should have feasted on that. He didn't - 0 Td's and 3 INTs, 53% completion.Simms 4th year player 1 TD, 7 INTGrads Rookie player 9TD, 9 INTRookie QB's are awful so to be so much worse than the rookie says a lot about who Simms is.Simms 3rd year NFC South ChampionshipHe was playing on a team with a #1 defense and he had a running game. These are 2 luxury's unafforded to Grad's.