Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: InChuckyItrust on November 02, 2006, 02:14:11 PMthe only reason lynch wasnt re-signed is because he failed our physical. This is total BS. He agreed to take a paycut if they made him the starter & they wouldn't do it--great call by the way. And DB is a 1st round HOF.
the only reason lynch wasnt re-signed is because he failed our physical.
Beniro,Why keep him just because he was great in years past.He's playing horrible this year.
Quote from: karen anderson on November 04, 2006, 12:26:23 AMQuote from: InChuckyItrust on November 02, 2006, 02:14:11 PMthe only reason lynch wasnt re-signed is because he failed our physical. This is total BS. He agreed to take a paycut if they made him the starter & they wouldn't do it--great call by the way. And DB is a 1st round HOF. actually your post is total bs. Thats from an inside guy. Our doc was willing to pass even though he failed because he is john lynch but Gruden said he wanted no part of it. Put things together logically. If Lynch was willing to take a pay cut, he would have been here no questions asked. But he wasnt there physically, hence hes gone numb in his extremities 2x since he left. Nice job showing your ignorance, but what should I have expected. Lynch has a neck problem, that and that alone is why hes not a buc.
Are our safties better than Lynch? Do you hit somebody hard enuff to draw a 75,000 fine if you haven't got it any more? You can not say (with a straight face) that we wouldn't be better with him.
We need to stop falling in love with Brooks at the WLB spot. If he's a true leader, he would do whatever it takes to help the team, because he's just not getting it done at his position. I think he could be a Pro Bowl MLB, if given the chance. He has the instincts and looked pretty unstoppable when blitzing up the middle. I think he's lost a step, but playing @ MLB would put him one step closer to the action and could extend his career 2-3 more years and give Ruud time to develop. Putting him @ SLB would be a slap in the face. I'd like to see him retire a Buccaneer, but not at the cost of defensive excellence. I'm not giving up on him either. I do not want to see the Bucs dump him and watch him make the Pro Bowl on another team. For all he has done for this franchise, he deserves a look next season. If he's really lost it, then they should pull the plug.
Brooks in the middle is a recipe for disaster. You want a guy whos game has never been taking plays head on to be responsible for doing so on every single running play? Not to mention the Mike backer in oru system is basically a safety in the aspect he's got the deep middle 1/3 of the field when we play cover Y, so you think thats a good place to hide a guy whos lacking speed? I think not.
Before I get flamed let me say that he is one of my all time favorite players. I know he has a contract past this season, but it seems to me if he looks back over the tapes for this season with an honest eye, he may retire. There is no doubt he has lost a step and is missing tackles because of it. He should go out before it gets embarasing IMO.
Quote from: karen anderson on November 04, 2006, 08:40:11 PMAre our safties better than Lynch? Do you hit somebody hard enuff to draw a 75,000 fine if you haven't got it any more? You can not say (with a straight face) that we wouldn't be better with him.Lynch wouldn't have made a difference. If you believe that you're kidding yourself.