Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
In the first 3 games we got outrushed 512 to 140. Thats a freaking embarrassment.
Again, for Simms not to realize that Gruden was going to add Garcia or some vet, makes me question Simms intelligence.
You would think he woulda knew the Bucs were going to add another QB.....Bottom Line: I think Simms knew the Bucs were going to add a QB, but he expected to be the starter. I guess when you know you have no shot to beat out Garcia(more so that hes playing better then the people who say Gruden doesnt like Simms), you would second guess your decision.
Gruden PROBABLY LOVES THE KID...to give that piece of trash 2.5 mil a year after he broke his spleen and stunk up the joint.
Why are all you Simms supporters panties in a bunch about Gruden announcing Garcia the starter? I don't get it, this isn't a brand new thing here, it's been done over and over. While Gruden thought it would be an open competition, watching Simms slow recorvery has probably changed his mind. He sees how far off Simms is right now, settle down about it. I really feel there's no grey area with Gruden, it's all black and white. He says what he feels and isn't a calculated as some on here want to think.
His decision making is impeccable and he's got a cannon.
Quote from: keeponbucn on June 30, 2007, 07:15:24 PMQuote from: JC510 on June 30, 2007, 05:20:17 PM His decision making is impeccable and he's got a cannon. We're watching a completely different player then JC. The line wasn't great last year but that doesn't totally explain the 1 TD and 7 int stat he threw up last year. He's going to have to prove that's an anomaly and I don't think he's got the mentals to prove it. Why are all you Simms supporters panties in a bunch about Gruden announcing Garcia the starter? I don't get it, this isn't a brand new thing here, it's been done over and over. While Gruden thought it would be an open competition, watching Simms slow recorvery has probably changed his mind. He sees how far off Simms is right now, settle down about it. I really feel there's no grey area with Gruden, it's all black and white. He says what he feels and isn't a calculated as some on here want to think. In the last 8 regular season games of 2005 he had 3 INTs. That is lights out QB play.
Quote from: JC510 on June 30, 2007, 05:20:17 PM His decision making is impeccable and he's got a cannon. We're watching a completely different player then JC. The line wasn't great last year but that doesn't totally explain the 1 TD and 7 int stat he threw up last year. He's going to have to prove that's an anomaly and I don't think he's got the mentals to prove it. Why are all you Simms supporters panties in a bunch about Gruden announcing Garcia the starter? I don't get it, this isn't a brand new thing here, it's been done over and over. While Gruden thought it would be an open competition, watching Simms slow recorvery has probably changed his mind. He sees how far off Simms is right now, settle down about it. I really feel there's no grey area with Gruden, it's all black and white. He says what he feels and isn't a calculated as some on here want to think.
Against the Ravens if we had Jeff Garcia the score would still have been 27-0, the line got whooped for 60 minutes.
Against ATL we got outrushed 306 to 40. Enough said.
Quote from: UMguy1999 on June 30, 2007, 01:14:16 PMA respectful coach would not even mention starter, and I am sure when they were negotiating with Simms, nothing came up about Earning a start, which he has already done twice for this team. I guess some Gruden lovers will claim its his way of motivating his QB's, like going off on Simms to the media about when he was drafted, yet putting all his hopes into a QB that was not even good enough to be drafted in the NFL and another that went in the 6th round.You chose to judge Simms by his worst games, well try judging Garcia by his worse games and you won't like what you see either.Throw in the fact that he is 37, and has a noodle arm and you are left with not much of a QB IMO. Karl the truth was on tv a few nites ago and was asked about Garcia being named the starter.... his response was that it was a good thing and that all players want/need to know who the guy is going into camp. I'll take his word over yours.Secondly, when has Chris "earned" the starting job twice? He got the gig when a 5-1 Griese got hurt and ended with a 6-5 record of his own.... hardly a glowing resume. Last year, he "earned" the starting job by default... after competing with a 6th round rookie.
A respectful coach would not even mention starter, and I am sure when they were negotiating with Simms, nothing came up about Earning a start, which he has already done twice for this team. I guess some Gruden lovers will claim its his way of motivating his QB's, like going off on Simms to the media about when he was drafted, yet putting all his hopes into a QB that was not even good enough to be drafted in the NFL and another that went in the 6th round.You chose to judge Simms by his worst games, well try judging Garcia by his worse games and you won't like what you see either.Throw in the fact that he is 37, and has a noodle arm and you are left with not much of a QB IMO.
Quote from: JC510 on June 30, 2007, 05:20:17 PMHis decision making is impeccable and he's got a cannon. The first part of this comment is complete nonsense and he's got a strong arm but takes too long to wind up and release.
Chris has a very high opinion of his ability. We knew this as far back as the draft when he was stunned he fell to the third. That confidence is certainly something necessary in a pro player, but I think he's not realistic in his self-assessment. The contract he turned down was more than fair value for him, and he did himself a disservice by not taking it -- the staff obviously knew his current skill level better than he did. Had he been a bit more realistic he migh not have passed on that. That was his mistake, re-signing here this year wasn'tAs for changing his mind "knowing what he knows now", what exactly does that mean? Knowing that they were bringing in a Vet after his horrible showing? He already knew that was coming. Knowing that his motion was shot? I wonder how that would be any different had he not signed with us this year.Chris still has a chance here, he's just got to earn it. How about that. Having to earn something. Thats not really a terrible thing. Just show that you can be the guy, Tampa is his best chance for that, had he gone somewhere else with his hurt motion and had to learn a new system he'd be sitting all year now matter what. Here at least he can work his way back to the #2 spot.
Quote from: keeponbucn on June 30, 2007, 07:15:24 PM How many times does it have to be said that he knows he has to win to keep his job and that he is going to play the guys who he thinks will win for him. I dont think your job needs to be on the line in order to play the guy who is gonna win. Even if Grudens job aint on the line, he's still playin Garcia over Simms.Simms is at best an average QB. His record is less than stellar. His decision making is FAR from impeccable. Can't believe someone said that. He's got a strong arm and he can throw a real pretty deep ball. Too bad you cant just have Joey G just run 40 yard sprints every play. Simms is gone. He'll never be the QB of the Bucs again. I'll bet next offseason the Bucs bring in another guy to take the reigns from Garcia.
How many times does it have to be said that he knows he has to win to keep his job and that he is going to play the guys who he thinks will win for him.
Thats why Simms has a 1.2 INT% when Cadillac runs for 3.7 ypc or better. Jeff Garcia had a 1.43 INT% last year when Westbrook ran for atleast 4.3 every game. Some how that translates to Garcia is perfect for this system and Simms sucks. This reminds of this last time last year when most people were hyping up Fiedler and saying how much Rattay sucks, just 100 times more meaningful.How come when Cadillac has crappy games, alot of them, its because of the line. But when Simms has crappy games, directly related to when Cadillac has his crappy games, its because he sucks and he's not fit for the system? Double standard much? Oh wait, here comes "Simms hurt the running game" and "Garcia will help the running game". Right, Garcia's 5th grade arm is gonna really open things up.
Quote from: JC510 on July 01, 2007, 10:02:42 AMThats why Simms has a 1.2 INT% when Cadillac runs for 3.7 ypc or better. Jeff Garcia had a 1.43 INT% last year when Westbrook ran for atleast 4.3 every game. Some how that translates to Garcia is perfect for this system and Simms sucks. This reminds of this last time last year when most people were hyping up Fiedler and saying how much Rattay sucks, just 100 times more meaningful.How come when Cadillac has crappy games, alot of them, its because of the line. But when Simms has crappy games, directly related to when Cadillac has his crappy games, its because he sucks and he's not fit for the system? Double standard much? Oh wait, here comes "Simms hurt the running game" and "Garcia will help the running game". Right, Garcia's 5th grade arm is gonna really open things up.So does this mean that after 5 yrs in the league, Simms is not capable of winning games on his own?
JC510, I understand that you have your allegiance to Simms and i can respect that but where does this theory that Garcia has a "5th grade arm" come from?