Boards > The Red Board

Would you rather have more fab 5's than the magazine?

(1/5) > >>

coopsxx:
just wondering if anyone else feels like this?

the magazines are good but most the stories tend to get out of date quick, and the others could easily be posted on the site. Also many of the "80 pages" do seem to be adverts.

Not gripping, i realise it's a way to make cash, just wondering if there were more efficient ways to get the great scoop out of you guys.

also when are those podcasts starting?

DanTurksGhost:
Personally I don't read either, so my opinion probably wouldn't help.

bradentonian:
I think it's a very valid question, as with their current resources it appears that the PR team needs to focus on one or the other.  They have made a strong commitment to improving the size of the magazine, but it seems to have pulled some of the focus from the web reporting.  Personally, I'd prefer better, more consistant web reporting, with fewer, less frequent, but larger mags.  The mags are best for photos, the occasional player/coach interview, and FA/Draft preview.  No need to have that every month IMO.  However I'm sure there are plenty of others that feel the opposite is true.

T:
Give me the magazine, I stopped being an insider about 2 months ago and didn't think it was worth it. Give me the magazine and the message boards on here and I'm happy.

goto11:
More Fab 5s and more good web articles.  The magazine is pretty and nice to read right before bed or something, but isn't a good source of breaking news or analysis.  It's better for things like interviews and player profiles and items that don't depend so much on timing.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page