Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Rice did not need to take a paycut as he was in the last year of his contract. The team did not need the money generated from a pay cut.
Quote from: naplesbuc on July 27, 2007, 11:27:11 AMThe only reason I can think of that they did this at this time is because the injury is more severe than they thought. exactly, I know the Bucs didn't want to cut him, they know what type of player he is and for Rice to say that Gruden's happy today really smells of emotion. The last thing Gruden wants is to lose a HOF DE, I know that.
The only reason I can think of that they did this at this time is because the injury is more severe than they thought.
"I took a pay cut to come to Tampa. I'm the most consistent thing they ever had in Tampa" These two statements bug me the most. Correct me if i'm wrong, but wasn't Rice signed to the largest defensive contract ever, at that time.
"I took a pay cut to come to Tampa. I'm the most consistent thing they ever had in Tampa" These two statements bug me the most. Correct me if i'm wrong, but wasn't Rice signed to the largest defensive contract ever, at that time. Also anyone who knows the Bucs knows Rice is very inconsistent. Yes he will get his sack number by the end of the year, but he has been a non-factor in many games.
...by the same token the Bucs did not need to pay him the full amount if they deemed him not being able to perform to the level of pay. Whether the team "needed" the money matters little in this case
Without even reading either the full thread or the comments made by Rice....is there anyone at all who's surprised that a player who has been unexpectedly cut is not going to have glowing comments about the cutters?
Quote...by the same token the Bucs did not need to pay him the full amount if they deemed him not being able to perform to the level of pay. Whether the team "needed" the money matters little in this caseIF that is the case then why is Wyms on the roster?
Quote from: All_da_way on July 27, 2007, 12:24:22 PMQuote...by the same token the Bucs did not need to pay him the full amount if they deemed him not being able to perform to the level of pay. Whether the team "needed" the money matters little in this caseIF that is the case then why is Wyms on the roster? Is he hurt and deemed not ready to play?
Quote from: Ryan24 on July 27, 2007, 12:41:15 PMQuote from: All_da_way on July 27, 2007, 12:24:22 PMQuote...by the same token the Bucs did not need to pay him the full amount if they deemed him not being able to perform to the level of pay. Whether the team "needed" the money matters little in this caseIF that is the case then why is Wyms on the roster? Is he hurt and deemed not ready to play?PR has been reporting that the Bucs FO doesn't feel that Wyms' play is up the the level of his contract