Welcome, Guest
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: IR and roster limits...are they really needed? « previous next »
Page: 1

ZenBuc

*
Practice Squad

Posts : 4
Offline
: November 07, 2006, 06:03:34 PM

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/061107

I found this an interesting read on the need, or lack thereof,  for IR, roster limits, and game-day inactives.

There's also a blurb about the Bucs farther down in the article about how "When Tampa's own Tampa 2 is giving up easy deep passes, you know the season is lost."

OpTiOnMaStA

*
Practice Squad

Posts : 0
Offline
#1 : November 07, 2006, 06:12:34 PM

Players that are put on the IR aren't coming back because they aren't going to be healthy enough to come back. Most players on IR can't play that year. They may look healthy but they aren't.

The only thing I agree with here is the inactive list. They should just set 53 as the number of guys and then do away with inactives. I can't understand one reason why there are inactives, either.
Page: 1
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: IR and roster limits...are they really needed? « previous next »
:

Hide Tools Show Tools