Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
He's wrong, most GM's have the power to do so.
I wouldn't think there are very many GM's, if any, that could fire a coach on his own.
I wouldn't think there are very many GM's, if any, that could fire a coach on his own. With salary ramifications and with it being such a big business, I am sure the VP-P-CEO and so on would have to be consulted.
So people think the Jerry Jones, Lil' Danny Snyder organizational model is the way to go? You go with that.
No GM working for the Glazers, past or present and probably future, has/had the power to fire or hire a head coach. None. Period.
Quote from: Cheveliar on November 13, 2006, 09:57:05 AMIf your organization is strong enough, then accountability doesn't not have to flow up and down your chain of command. To me, it's better that it flow across and parallel to those lines. What Comrade? Seriously, you can have some lateral level of accountability but authority (which is different than accountibility) has to behas to be hierarchical because there has to be a final word.
If your organization is strong enough, then accountability doesn't not have to flow up and down your chain of command. To me, it's better that it flow across and parallel to those lines.
Quote from: dalbuc on November 13, 2006, 08:58:33 AMSimple question, can Allen fire Gruden? Does he have that authority? Answer: no. Allen was brought here to serve Gruden. My thoughts, exactly!!!
Simple question, can Allen fire Gruden? Does he have that authority? Answer: no. Allen was brought here to serve Gruden.
Chev, your point is well taken. However, it's nice to know there is someone who would hold the coach accountable for his actions; or lack of them, when it comes to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.
I'm sure every team in the NFL has a different spin on their hierarchy or chain of command. Â Is it important that Bruce has the power to fire Jon or is it more important that they have the type of relationship that will enhance the team?