Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
The way you win is if Peterson is the superstar he appears to be. If you asked any fan would if had already spent the #5 pick on Errict Rhett, would you spend the #4 pick two years later on Walter Payton, I think most would say yes.
This whole Adrian Peterson thing is getting annoying. No one in their right mind could honestly think, AT THE TIME OF THE DRAFT, that we should have 100% have picked AP at #4. IMO, the only legitimate question is why did we take Gaines over Okoye? But you know what? We don't have Okoye, we don't have Peterson, and we didn't draft guys like Steven Jackson or Mark Anderson when we had the chance. And yeah it's frustrating sometimes, but GET OVER IT. Time to stop living in the past. Instead of people pissing and moaning because we didn't draft or sign <insert name here> why not be happy that we drafted guys like Ruud, Trueblood and Tanard Jackson, be happy that we signed guys like June and Garcia. I swear, people will find anything to complain about, even when we're 4-2 and leading the south. You can't expect the FO to get every single move right, to have every move work to perfection. I for one am going to continue to enjoy what this season brings and rally around the guys that are actually on this team.
Does anyone here relaize that Minnesota has a pretty damn good OL? I'm not trying to lessen AP's skills, but if anyone really thinks that he'd be doing in Tampa what he's doing in Minny, you're out of your mind.
I will once again preface this by saying I thought Adrian Peterson was the best player in the draftIs there any way Jon Gruden could win in this situation? Let's say he does take Adrian Peterson. The same crowd who is still mad about John Lynch and Joe Jurevicius would be claiming Gruden has no loyalty to his players. None of his players trust him. Gruden clubs baby seals and eats children. Now the same exact crowd of people are saying, Gruden couldnt put his ego aside and admit that Caddy isnt "that guy" in order to draft Adrian Peterson. How does this guy ever win? The quick answer is, he doesn't.Now getting away from the lose/lose scenario that Gruden was in by having the ability to draft, or pass on Adrian Peterson let's examine it from Bruce Allen's standpoint. If we draft Adrian Peterson, the Gruden/Allen hating crowd would say "why are we paying our backfield more than anyone else in the league." "Why does Gruden neglect the defense and continue to pump money into the offense." "Why in a league with a salary cap would we use two top 5 picks on RBs who are going to account for 15% of our salary cap and A LOT of guaranteed moeny for the next 5 years"Only the Lions make decisions like that, and theres a reason for itAnd my last point on this subject, what are you people thinking when you question why Gruden would still have faith in Cadillac? He was rookie of the year in 2005, and he had a terrible year in 2006. He had 1 bad season, which was preceeded by 1 excellent season. You dont win in this league by making irrational decision like giving up on a player like that, with talent like that, who broke Bo Jackson's TD record over a 4 year span in college and followed it up by winning rookie of teh year. sometimes I wonder if everyone's wives are getting on and posting under their names on here
Quote from: RedAlert on October 18, 2007, 01:12:39 PMDoes anyone here relaize that Minnesota has a pretty damn good OL? I'm not trying to lessen AP's skills, but if anyone really thinks that he'd be doing in Tampa what he's doing in Minny, you're out of your mind.You don't have faith in this line? This line we have is a pretty damn good line too. He might not be doing the exact thing hes doing in MIN, but I guarantee he'd be doing a hell of a lot more here than what our backs are capable of. Can you honestly say that he would not have helped this teams running game? That he would not be improving our run blocking, because when you have a back with his playmaking ability, your line WANTS to stay on blocks long enough. You're line has fun run blocking for you. That's what happens when your backs produce. OUR'S aren't..
exactly nobody is bashing the saints for taking bush...
Quote from: bizkitlimped on October 18, 2007, 01:15:00 PMexactly nobody is bashing the saints for taking bush...I bashed the pick then, and I still bash it now. Bush was not anywhere near worth a top-5 pick. Had they addressed their defense instead they might have gone all the way last year and been in better shape this year as well.
Quote from: bradentonian on October 18, 2007, 01:57:19 PMQuote from: bizkitlimped on October 18, 2007, 01:15:00 PMexactly nobody is bashing the saints for taking bush...I bashed the pick then, and I still bash it now. Bush was not anywhere near worth a top-5 pick. Had they addressed their defense instead they might have gone all the way last year and been in better shape this year as well.but he is the perfect compliment to deuce mcallister is he not? He carried that team in their win monday night. Something our running backs haven't done since carnells rookie season.
Quote from: bizkitlimped on October 18, 2007, 02:00:52 PMQuote from: bradentonian on October 18, 2007, 01:57:19 PMQuote from: bizkitlimped on October 18, 2007, 01:15:00 PMexactly nobody is bashing the saints for taking bush...I bashed the pick then, and I still bash it now. Bush was not anywhere near worth a top-5 pick. Had they addressed their defense instead they might have gone all the way last year and been in better shape this year as well.but he is the perfect compliment to deuce mcallister is he not? He carried that team in their win monday night. Something our running backs haven't done since carnells rookie season.I ripped the Bush pick, too. Not because they already had Deuce, but because I just didn't think he was an impact NFL player. You should NEVER use the word "complement" to describe the #2 overall pick in the draft.