Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Chris Simms=Win this week on MNFHe would have nailed those deep balls
Quote from: utspartan on November 15, 2006, 02:26:36 PMChris Simms=Win this week on MNFHe would have nailed those deep ballsReally? Then how do you explain Simms incomplete deep three times to Galloway in game 3 against these same Panthers?
Alligator arms...watch the games again on Tivo...yes there were some passes that were missed. However Chris did hit the majority of them in stride onkly to watch them hit the ground. The WR were not sharp and really still arnt
Quote from: utspartan on November 15, 2006, 02:41:32 PMAlligator arms...watch the games again on Tivo...yes there were some passes that were missed. However Chris did hit the majority of them in stride onkly to watch them hit the ground. The WR were not sharp and really still arntAnd Gradkowski was victimized multiple times in the game vs NYG by big time drops, and what should have been a solid comeback victory against the Saints was blown by special teams allowing Reggie Bush to run back a punt for a TD. Simms may have a prettier deep ball, but he was also intercepted at an alarming rate. You can't simply pick and choose parts of his game and say because of that one aspect he would have beaten this team or that team. Therefore, there really isn't much basis to say uncategorically that had Simms played on MNF the Bucs would have won.
The only thing GRads has over Simms, IMO, is an ability to run for 5 yards.
Quote from: Boid Fink on November 15, 2006, 03:02:52 PMThe only thing GRads has over Simms, IMO, is an ability to run for 5 yards.That, and a quicker release, and the ability to make faster decisions, and a better understanding of the offense, and..People make the mistake of looking only at the physical attributes of one QB vs the other, ignoring the mental part of the game which is far more important from a coaching perspective.
you crack me up
Quote from: DanTurksGhost on November 15, 2006, 02:48:47 PMQuote from: utspartan on November 15, 2006, 02:41:32 PMAlligator arms...watch the games again on Tivo...yes there were some passes that were missed. However Chris did hit the majority of them in stride onkly to watch them hit the ground. The WR were not sharp and really still arntAnd Gradkowski was victimized multiple times in the game vs NYG by big time drops, and what should have been a solid comeback victory against the Saints was blown by special teams allowing Reggie Bush to run back a punt for a TD. Simms may have a prettier deep ball, but he was also intercepted at an alarming rate. You can't simply pick and choose parts of his game and say because of that one aspect he would have beaten this team or that team. Therefore, there really isn't much basis to say uncategorically that had Simms played on MNF the Bucs would have won.His INTs were not usually from errant deep passes.Bounces of of feet, blocked passes at the LOS, slinging a twenty yarder into Chris McCalisters arm, a quick out to Clayton.His deep balls were prettier, and they are actually more effective, and that is the entire basis of this argument.The only thing GRads has over Simms, IMO, is an ability to run for 5 yards.What happens if GRuden gets fired? Â Do the Bucs run the WeCoOf again? Â Not likely. Â And in that instance, I would rather see Simms in a shotgun.
Quote from: Boid Fink on November 15, 2006, 03:02:52 PMQuote from: DanTurksGhost on November 15, 2006, 02:48:47 PMQuote from: utspartan on November 15, 2006, 02:41:32 PMAlligator arms...watch the games again on Tivo...yes there were some passes that were missed. However Chris did hit the majority of them in stride onkly to watch them hit the ground. The WR were not sharp and really still arntAnd Gradkowski was victimized multiple times in the game vs NYG by big time drops, and what should have been a solid comeback victory against the Saints was blown by special teams allowing Reggie Bush to run back a punt for a TD. Simms may have a prettier deep ball, but he was also intercepted at an alarming rate. You can't simply pick and choose parts of his game and say because of that one aspect he would have beaten this team or that team. Therefore, there really isn't much basis to say uncategorically that had Simms played on MNF the Bucs would have won.His INTs were not usually from errant deep passes.Bounces of of feet, blocked passes at the LOS, slinging a twenty yarder into Chris McCalisters arm, a quick out to Clayton.His deep balls were prettier, and they are actually more effective, and that is the entire basis of this argument.The only thing GRads has over Simms, IMO, is an ability to run for 5 yards.What happens if GRuden gets fired? Do the Bucs run the WeCoOf again? Not likely. And in that instance, I would rather see Simms in a shotgun.and a qucker drop, release, decision-making, etc. I'm not sure how anyone can sit here and say differently. Every concern about Grads is fixable, Simms problems aren't and huge red flags. I couldn't believe the difference in pace to this offense once Grads was running it. Totally different speed, not so deliberate.
Quote from: DanTurksGhost on November 15, 2006, 02:48:47 PMQuote from: utspartan on November 15, 2006, 02:41:32 PMAlligator arms...watch the games again on Tivo...yes there were some passes that were missed. However Chris did hit the majority of them in stride onkly to watch them hit the ground. The WR were not sharp and really still arntAnd Gradkowski was victimized multiple times in the game vs NYG by big time drops, and what should have been a solid comeback victory against the Saints was blown by special teams allowing Reggie Bush to run back a punt for a TD. Simms may have a prettier deep ball, but he was also intercepted at an alarming rate. You can't simply pick and choose parts of his game and say because of that one aspect he would have beaten this team or that team. Therefore, there really isn't much basis to say uncategorically that had Simms played on MNF the Bucs would have won.His INTs were not usually from errant deep passes.Bounces of of feet, blocked passes at the LOS, slinging a twenty yarder into Chris McCalisters arm, a quick out to Clayton.His deep balls were prettier, and they are actually more effective, and that is the entire basis of this argument.The only thing GRads has over Simms, IMO, is an ability to run for 5 yards.What happens if GRuden gets fired? Do the Bucs run the WeCoOf again? Not likely. And in that instance, I would rather see Simms in a shotgun.