Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
So far he is 1 - 7 or 8 going back to Philly for picking QB's
Quote from: All_da_way on November 16, 2006, 08:37:23 AMQuote from: utspartan on November 16, 2006, 08:35:03 AMDo you think however Chris Simms ability to burn you deep had anything to do with the running game? No. Carnell had the best start of any NFL RB last year with Griese playing average/below average.Griese didnt miss WIDE OPEN recievers
Quote from: utspartan on November 16, 2006, 08:35:03 AMDo you think however Chris Simms ability to burn you deep had anything to do with the running game? No. Carnell had the best start of any NFL RB last year with Griese playing average/below average.
Do you think however Chris Simms ability to burn you deep had anything to do with the running game?
Quote from: caradoc on November 16, 2006, 01:47:04 PMQuote from: UMguy1999 on November 16, 2006, 01:35:21 PMThose stats show that the numbers were close, but they are differant players Grad's tends to throw the short passes and uses his check downs most of the time. Last season teams were afraid of Simms's deep ball which helped the running game open up. With Grad's teams just have to make sure Gallaway is covered and stack a saftey in the box and wait for the run or a short pass. When teams do that more times than not they will stop us.the defense had nothing to do with 6 straight 3 and outs on offense, or having the 31st rankind offense, in fact our poor offense play had made the D"s job harder.So then why weren't teams "afraid of Simms' deep ball" this year? Teams still put a lot in the box last year. Whatever fear they had of him going deep was balanced by his inability to throw short...Who the Ravens? yeah they are a weak defense LMAO, and our D giving up all those rushing yards to the Falcons had nothing to do with the options on offense... The one game he started to get back to his old form he gets his spleen busted.As far as short passes 61% completions last season, 66% in December and he can't throw short huh? well I guess that's why he doesn't go 3 and out 6 times in a row because he looks downfield, now there is a concept.... He likes to throw 11 yards on 3rd and 10 as opposed to 3...Under your argument, though our O-line has more talent than last season, we have a mobile QB, (a Gruden guy) & we still can't run the ball. So saying Defenses should and will play close to the line against him because it stops the run and most of his favorite passing routes.It is so funny how easy simple minds forget....Simms was one perfectly thrown and dropped pass away from actually winning a playoff game. Keep rooting for him to leave then we will be stuck with no QB and no coach, see how you feel then...Gruden's ego has no bounds, if he can turn a 6th round turd into a premier QB he will truly be a QB Guru..well thats what he thinks anyway. So far he is 1 - 7 or 8 going back to Philly for picking QB's
Quote from: UMguy1999 on November 16, 2006, 01:35:21 PMThose stats show that the numbers were close, but they are differant players Grad's tends to throw the short passes and uses his check downs most of the time. Last season teams were afraid of Simms's deep ball which helped the running game open up. With Grad's teams just have to make sure Gallaway is covered and stack a saftey in the box and wait for the run or a short pass. When teams do that more times than not they will stop us.the defense had nothing to do with 6 straight 3 and outs on offense, or having the 31st rankind offense, in fact our poor offense play had made the D"s job harder.So then why weren't teams "afraid of Simms' deep ball" this year? Teams still put a lot in the box last year. Whatever fear they had of him going deep was balanced by his inability to throw short...
Those stats show that the numbers were close, but they are differant players Grad's tends to throw the short passes and uses his check downs most of the time. Last season teams were afraid of Simms's deep ball which helped the running game open up. With Grad's teams just have to make sure Gallaway is covered and stack a saftey in the box and wait for the run or a short pass. When teams do that more times than not they will stop us.the defense had nothing to do with 6 straight 3 and outs on offense, or having the 31st rankind offense, in fact our poor offense play had made the D"s job harder.
i dunno i gotta go with UMguy on this one...you say grad brought us back to win against cincy...well you can thank the ref for that game...and technically yes he brought us back to win the philly game...but c'mon dude...how often do you see kickers kick 60+ yd. game winning field goals...that was just luck
Quote from: bizkitlimped on November 16, 2006, 03:49:54 PMi dunno i gotta go with UMguy on this one...you say grad brought us back to win against cincy...well you can thank the ref for that game...and technically yes he brought us back to win the philly game...but c'mon dude...how often do you see kickers kick 60+ yd. game winning field goals...that was just luckWell if we are being truly subjective here Simms brought us back in one game last year, the Skins regular season game. All the other wins can be contributed to special teams or D plays either getting us points or giving the O great field position.The bottom line is when a team comes from behind in the 4th quarter it is considered a win from behind on the QBs record, REGARDLESS of how it happens.
Gradkowski threw the ball that Clayton caught to win the game. That's all that matters. When he was called on to make a play he did it. You can't hypotheitcal away those things. He also got us, as far as it was, FG range to take that shot. You give him credit for that too. I can't stand people, on both sides, doing the some plays count and others don't and what if's. There are near-misses, near-hits and what-if's in any game. What matters is what happened.
Quote from: ronde bear on November 16, 2006, 01:46:42 AMHad 3 come from behind 4th quaretr scoring drives that took leads in games (when Have he Bucs ever done that, ever?). well, gradkowski did that 3 times in a row, @NO, v CIN, vPHI - the first 3 starts of his career.
Had 3 come from behind 4th quaretr scoring drives that took leads in games (when Have he Bucs ever done that, ever?).
Quote from: BucINT20 on November 16, 2006, 09:04:21 AMQuote from: ronde bear on November 16, 2006, 01:46:42 AMHad 3 come from behind 4th quaretr scoring drives that took leads in games (when Have he Bucs ever done that, ever?). well, gradkowski did that 3 times in a row, @NO, v CIN, vPHI - the first 3 starts of his career.The Bucs didnt even score an offensive TD against Philly. Lets not compare thsoe games to what SImms did TWICE against Atlanta, once against Washington and once against Chicago. Guess I counted wrong. Sims had 4 come from behind 4th quarter scoring drives that won games or shouldve won games