Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
ONE good year. He blew the first 2 years. this guy has Marquise Walker written ALL over him.against florida he had 5 receptinos for 78 yards and a TD.HOW IS THAT DOMINATING?If that's your criteria than you got some learnin to do.
Quote from: KrAzYbUc on January 29, 2008, 01:01:58 PMif youre a gator fan than you should know how much your defense sucked and that doing that against your 'best corner and safety' isnt exactly a ringing bell of endorsement.just say NO to michigan receivers.michigan and florida receivers SUCK.i keep hearing this about Michigan. I want it defined. I'm not a michigan fan but i feel the need to clarify this because its repeated so often. Why do Michigan receivers suck? because of Terrell and Walker? Its not like Michigan is Texas Tech or Hawaii with some gimmick offense that churns out multiple 1,000 yard receivers each year. What about Anthony Carter, Derrick Alexander, Amani Toomer, Braylon Edwards, Steve Breaston and Jason Avant?
if youre a gator fan than you should know how much your defense sucked and that doing that against your 'best corner and safety' isnt exactly a ringing bell of endorsement.just say NO to michigan receivers.michigan and florida receivers SUCK.
i keep hearing this about Michigan. I want it defined. I'm not a michigan fan but i feel the need to clarify this because its repeated so often. Why do Michigan receivers suck? because of Terrell and Walker? Its not like Michigan is Texas Tech or Hawaii with some gimmick offense that churns out multiple 1,000 yard receivers each year. What about Anthony Carter, Derrick Alexander, Amani Toomer, Braylon Edwards, Steve Breaston and Jason Avant?
FRG is the most logical poster on this board. You guys just don\'t like where the logical conclusions take you.
I don't know much about him but isn't there another WR on the team thats pretty good also?
Quote from: KrAzYbUc on January 29, 2008, 01:13:28 PMONE good year. He blew the first 2 years.LOL. Do you even attempt to research a player before making assinine statements? He blew for the first two years? Thats hilarious considering his first year he was a freshman so he didn't have a great year, hi sophmore year he had 703 yards and 9tds while not playing 4 games and playing another hurt, but he sucked that year too...........
ONE good year. He blew the first 2 years.
Quote from: utspartan on January 29, 2008, 03:41:25 PMManningham drew double teams...the reason why Florida couldnt contain Hart was that Manningham was such a threat.There weren't a whole lot of double-teams.Quote from: utspartan on January 29, 2008, 03:41:25 PMAnd Arrington was matched one on one with Rickerson and sometimes over the top with Joiner. So they were double-teaming both recievers?Quote from: utspartan on January 29, 2008, 03:41:25 PMDoes TO always have bigger days than the other two recievrs on the field? How about when Key was here...was he always #1?Nobody is arguing with you if Manningham was Michigan's number one receiver. We had problems with you saying he "dominated" when he clearly didn't. Like he said, he was the fourth best offensive player for Michigan in that game...hardly dominating.Quote from: utspartan on January 29, 2008, 03:41:25 PMThe Gator defense had to devote so much to Manningham that game because when they didnt he burned them..he opened up the running game and freed up coverage on the 2nd and 3rd optionsAsk Brandon Spikes if he is worth a late first round pick...He would tell you Manningham was absolutly a freak of nature that gameI don't agree with your assessment of how that happened, but you are entitled to your opinion.You obviously are high on Manningham and that is great. Some would agree, most disagree.
Manningham drew double teams...the reason why Florida couldnt contain Hart was that Manningham was such a threat.
And Arrington was matched one on one with Rickerson and sometimes over the top with Joiner.
Does TO always have bigger days than the other two recievrs on the field? How about when Key was here...was he always #1?
The Gator defense had to devote so much to Manningham that game because when they didnt he burned them..he opened up the running game and freed up coverage on the 2nd and 3rd optionsAsk Brandon Spikes if he is worth a late first round pick...He would tell you Manningham was absolutly a freak of nature that game
I said many times that I was a person a while back that was skeptical of Mario Manningham and considerd him as another "Michigan Reciever" over hyped and slowHowever it wasnt till the Gator game (me being a Gator fan it was painfull to watch) that I started to appreciate what this kid brings to the table.For those of you who didnt watch the game or would like to refresh your memory on how much he dominated the Gator's defense I found the clips of Manningham during that game (he did this verses our best corner and safety all game Haden and Major Wright)
What I am saying Biggs is that Mario was coverd by the two most promising corner/safetys that we have in Haden and WrightArrington was covered by a guy that was consistantly getting burned all season in Rickerson...then I am sure when he started to need help over the top with Arrington he was assisted by Tony Joiner.No they were not both double teamed but Joiner was needd in some occasions when Rickerson was not able to contain Arrington on streak routesNot saying Arrington isn just as good as Manningham but if you see the splash plays made that game it was Manningham that was the star of that show.and Spikes was reffering to the end around and the fact that his defense was getting schooled by Mario when he said GD you're good....GD