Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: watson on December 03, 2006, 12:40:14 PMThere was 2 plays in the GT/WF game that I think speak volumes about Johnson. When GT attempted to throw the ball downfield and Johnson was one on one with the DB, the ball was up for grabs and the DB came down with it. It did not appear that Johnson really fought for the ball to either catch it or knock it down. On the other play, the WF WR went deep against 2 GT DBs and the ball was once again up for grabs. The WF WR came down with the ball because he wanted it more. If Johnson does not have the "fighter" mentality that you see someone like a Steve Smith then to me he is just this year's version of Charles Rogers or Mike Williams.One of those plays has nothing to do with Johnson. And are you really going to base this on one play? I've seen this guy play many times including once in person. He is a beast! When he played VT he was WIDE open half the time but his QB never saw him. With a real QB he could have twice as many yards as he has now.
There was 2 plays in the GT/WF game that I think speak volumes about Johnson. When GT attempted to throw the ball downfield and Johnson was one on one with the DB, the ball was up for grabs and the DB came down with it. It did not appear that Johnson really fought for the ball to either catch it or knock it down. On the other play, the WF WR went deep against 2 GT DBs and the ball was once again up for grabs. The WF WR came down with the ball because he wanted it more. If Johnson does not have the "fighter" mentality that you see someone like a Steve Smith then to me he is just this year's version of Charles Rogers or Mike Williams.
Quote from: LeeroyBuc on December 03, 2006, 12:58:05 PMQuote from: watson on December 03, 2006, 12:40:14 PMThere was 2 plays in the GT/WF game that I think speak volumes about Johnson. When GT attempted to throw the ball downfield and Johnson was one on one with the DB, the ball was up for grabs and the DB came down with it. It did not appear that Johnson really fought for the ball to either catch it or knock it down. On the other play, the WF WR went deep against 2 GT DBs and the ball was once again up for grabs. The WF WR came down with the ball because he wanted it more. If Johnson does not have the "fighter" mentality that you see someone like a Steve Smith then to me he is just this year's version of Charles Rogers or Mike Williams.One of those plays has nothing to do with Johnson. And are you really going to base this on one play? I've seen this guy play many times including once in person. He is a beast! When he played VT he was WIDE open half the time but his QB never saw him. With a real QB he could have twice as many yards as he has now. Wide open is college is not the same in the NFL. Yes a better QB could take advantage of CJ's abilities but he is not as polished coming out as people suggest.
THE reason the Bucs are bad is we have no talent! The WR's are a HUGE part of the giant lack of talent we have. We have one proven WR and he's 35 years old. If that's not a problem then I don't know what is. Certainly there are many positions of need and we could take any of them with our first pick, but to pass on CJ because our WR corps is just peaches is crazy.
Quote from: LeeroyBuc on December 02, 2006, 10:33:34 PMTHE reason the Bucs are bad is we have no talent! The WR's are a HUGE part of the giant lack of talent we have. We have one proven WR and he's 35 years old. If that's not a problem then I don't know what is. Certainly there are many positions of need and we could take any of them with our first pick, but to pass on CJ because our WR corps is just peaches is crazy.I think if the rest of the offense was clicking, the talent of guys like Clayton would magically show up. If we drafted Colston do you think he would be ROY material with the Bucs? Do you think any reciever in the league besides Terrell Owens would be looking good if they were on the Bucs? I don't think so. I think it takes time for an offensive line and running game to start clicking. It takes a good QB. Then after all that you find out what you have or don't have at the WR spot.
taking a cb early is a horrible idea. the nfl rules are against a cb and we dont need a superstar in this system. a good cb for this team can be had outside of the 1st easily.
this is not a coverage corner system.
Quote from: LeeroyBuc on December 02, 2006, 08:21:20 PMQuote from: Itchalot on December 02, 2006, 05:30:05 PMJohnson is not the answer for the Bucs, not if they have a top 5 draft choice. Johnson did not have a bad game. Worse. He had a good game, but didn't make the difference. To use the #1 pick on Johnson would be a mistake. He would do the same thing here. Come in, have good games, and not make a huge difference. This is because of the position he plays, and the fact that regardless of what you think about the Bucs WRs, they are not the reason the team is bad.Please tell me this is a joke. And PLEASE stop with the "_____ isn't the reason this team is bad" stuff. There are lots of reasons this team is bad. WR is one of them. There is no single reason. As for Johnson, he had 117 of his team's 129 yards receiving. That means he is the only weapon that team has! The other team knows this and he STILL got 117 yards! He's the only reason that game was even close. How on earth can you say these are reasons not to draft him? I didn't say _____ isn't the reason the Bucs are bad. I said WR isn't the reason the Bucs are bad. They aren't.
Quote from: Itchalot on December 02, 2006, 05:30:05 PMJohnson is not the answer for the Bucs, not if they have a top 5 draft choice. Johnson did not have a bad game. Worse. He had a good game, but didn't make the difference. To use the #1 pick on Johnson would be a mistake. He would do the same thing here. Come in, have good games, and not make a huge difference. This is because of the position he plays, and the fact that regardless of what you think about the Bucs WRs, they are not the reason the team is bad.Please tell me this is a joke. And PLEASE stop with the "_____ isn't the reason this team is bad" stuff. There are lots of reasons this team is bad. WR is one of them. There is no single reason. As for Johnson, he had 117 of his team's 129 yards receiving. That means he is the only weapon that team has! The other team knows this and he STILL got 117 yards! He's the only reason that game was even close. How on earth can you say these are reasons not to draft him?
Johnson is not the answer for the Bucs, not if they have a top 5 draft choice. Johnson did not have a bad game. Worse. He had a good game, but didn't make the difference. To use the #1 pick on Johnson would be a mistake. He would do the same thing here. Come in, have good games, and not make a huge difference. This is because of the position he plays, and the fact that regardless of what you think about the Bucs WRs, they are not the reason the team is bad.
The Bucs don't need a big upgrade at LT. A. Davis is the least of the problems. Clayton is a bust and Galloway is 35. Gaines Adams would be a good pick also. If CJ lays down a good 40 then he really is the next TO given his size, hands, vertical, and speed.