Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
C'mon people you are letting your Croc-fever get the best of you. Graham played good last year but he was hardly a dominant force and a guy that other teams schemed against. Graham does not strike fear into any team in this league.
Warrick is and will always be a better player than Graham.
Bash Cadillac all you want but Cadillac, hell even Pittman are BETTER THAN GRAHAM. For all those that bash Cadillac you need to check yourselves as Graham has not proven he can sustain ANYTHING.
Talk all you want about almost getting 1,000 yards - who cares. Its not how many yards you get, its when you get them and he was not the guy we went to when we needed the big play - it was Garcia.
Graham surprised me last year but lets not all of the sudden claim he is all that - he could be a one year wonder like many other backs and players in this league.
Dunn: Better blocker, better catching the ball and more speedGraham: Better Special Teams player and probably a little better inside the tackles
He should get a contract extension but he is not worth more than Dunn and I would have liked to see out RB stable consist of Dunn, Pittman and Bennett with Graham playing a dual role of FB and Special Teams player. OK, Graham is better than Bennett but he is not a better option than Pittman and/or Dunn. In the end we will all see that Dunn is better and Graham was a one year wonder. If Graham beats out Dunn and puts up 1,300 - 1,400 yards and 10 - 12 TD's I will be the first to say Graham is the back we should stick with, but I doubt I will ever have to say those words.
For those that said Norwood was better than Dunn that is the biggest joke - if that was the case why sign Michael Turner to that huge contract if Norwood is the man? Warrick player behind a crap OL last year just like Cadillac did for years.
It is amazing how many of you want to compare Graham's numbers to Cadillac's yet you forget some simple things such as Graham had a better QB, FB and OL in front of him while Cadillac played behind a crap OL, crap FB (Alstott was a pathetic blocker) and JV QB's in Rattay, Gradsuckski and Simms. When he actually had a QB in Griese he played very very good. If you are going to compare numbers look at those things because they are totally relevant.
Quote from: Ryan24 on March 12, 2008, 10:27:19 AMQuote from: BucsGuru on March 12, 2008, 08:35:14 AMChev, I agree about the upcoming season being an important one for EG. It's hard to argue with the numbers and consistency he put last year though. What will be the feeling of those on this board if he is the featured back next year and runs for 1,400 yards and 13 TD's? I believe had he started the entire season last year that those would have been realistic numbers? I'm optimistic about next season, but I'm definitely looking forward to it, especially with our O-line! I still love the fact Dunn is back in a Buc uniform and believe he will get double the touches Bennett does. Gruden will love what Dunn brings to the table and loves veterans.Graham basically had a 1200 yard season last year. That's right around what he would have had as a starter for 16 games. Projection vs Actual...do we understand that concept? You can always exceed/fall below your projected. Seeing as he didn't play for 16 games that's question number one. Will ge get those types of numbers? We don't know because we can't compare it to aan acctual for that period of time. That's just fact...
Quote from: BucsGuru on March 12, 2008, 08:35:14 AMChev, I agree about the upcoming season being an important one for EG. It's hard to argue with the numbers and consistency he put last year though. What will be the feeling of those on this board if he is the featured back next year and runs for 1,400 yards and 13 TD's? I believe had he started the entire season last year that those would have been realistic numbers? I'm optimistic about next season, but I'm definitely looking forward to it, especially with our O-line! I still love the fact Dunn is back in a Buc uniform and believe he will get double the touches Bennett does. Gruden will love what Dunn brings to the table and loves veterans.Graham basically had a 1200 yard season last year. That's right around what he would have had as a starter for 16 games.
Chev, I agree about the upcoming season being an important one for EG. It's hard to argue with the numbers and consistency he put last year though. What will be the feeling of those on this board if he is the featured back next year and runs for 1,400 yards and 13 TD's? I believe had he started the entire season last year that those would have been realistic numbers? I'm optimistic about next season, but I'm definitely looking forward to it, especially with our O-line! I still love the fact Dunn is back in a Buc uniform and believe he will get double the touches Bennett does. Gruden will love what Dunn brings to the table and loves veterans.
Quote from: Cheveliar on March 12, 2008, 10:58:01 AMQuote from: Ryan24 on March 12, 2008, 10:27:19 AMQuote from: BucsGuru on March 12, 2008, 08:35:14 AMChev, I agree about the upcoming season being an important one for EG. It's hard to argue with the numbers and consistency he put last year though. What will be the feeling of those on this board if he is the featured back next year and runs for 1,400 yards and 13 TD's? I believe had he started the entire season last year that those would have been realistic numbers? I'm optimistic about next season, but I'm definitely looking forward to it, especially with our O-line! I still love the fact Dunn is back in a Buc uniform and believe he will get double the touches Bennett does. Gruden will love what Dunn brings to the table and loves veterans.Graham basically had a 1200 yard season last year. That's right around what he would have had as a starter for 16 games. Projection vs Actual...do we understand that concept? You can always exceed/fall below your projected. Seeing as he didn't play for 16 games that's question number one. Will ge get those types of numbers? We don't know because we can't compare it to aan acctual for that period of time. That's just fact...Since I agree with you, I'm not sure why the arrogance.