Boards Recent Discussions Help Search RSS WAP2
Welcome, Guest
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: Kurt Warner « previous next »
Page: 1 2

Boid Fink

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 47889
Offline
« : December 05, 2006, 12:23:34 PM »
Quote from: DanTurksGhost on December 04, 2006, 06:47:15 PM

YIKES!

No wonder Warner goes to Church so much...
H.A.T.#1

naplesbuc

*****
Pro Bowler

Posts : 1235
Offline
« #1 : December 04, 2006, 01:40:48 PM »
THere aren't a lot of good choices out there.  Overpay for Simms and have him come back to compete for the job?  We know he has no upside in the Gruden offense.  Gradkowski is not ready for primetime and may never be.  McCown? 

No knight in shining armor is going to ride into town.

TURBO

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 15773
Offline
« #2 : December 04, 2006, 01:41:02 PM »
LOL!

he'd be dead by the 2nd wek!

\"I\'m sick of runnin\' from these wimps!\" Ajax - The Warriors

alldaway

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 33101
Offline
« #3 : December 04, 2006, 11:18:35 PM »
The Raiders drafting a QB in the first round as long as Al Davis is alive is slim.
Haters are going to hate

BTownBucFan

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 5787
Offline
« #4 : December 04, 2006, 10:47:47 PM »
Quote from: naplesbuc on December 04, 2006, 02:01:51 PM
Chances are the Raiders will have the top pick and take Quinn.  Another rookie next year means more losing.  Of any of the potential rookies I'd take Troy Smith because he will adapt to the pro game the quickest.

I see the Raider taking Smith before Quinn ... Smith fits their MO more than Quinn does - I'd pass on both



Guest
« #5 : December 04, 2006, 06:57:31 PM »
Warner has never played ina WCO

DanTurksGhost

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 18443
Offline
« #6 : December 04, 2006, 06:47:15 PM »

bucshot420

****
Starter

Posts : 548
Offline
« #7 : December 04, 2006, 06:44:41 PM »
not only does he not fit the offense but does anyone really want to see his Wife on TV every week?

coqui4

**
Rookie

Posts : 75
Offline
« #8 : December 04, 2006, 02:56:35 PM »
Couldn't agree with you more naples.

CadillacPower24_2006

*
Practice Squad

Posts : 0
Offline
« #9 : December 04, 2006, 02:02:15 PM »
Quote
we are in trouble, one of the best options imo is Plummer, better than Warner

i agree with that

naplesbuc

*****
Pro Bowler

Posts : 1235
Offline
« #10 : December 04, 2006, 02:03:02 PM »
Quote from: Mohawkbucs on December 04, 2006, 02:01:09 PM
we are in trouble, one of the best options imo is Plummer, better than Warner

Plummer has mobility but questionable arm strength and accuracy.  The tradeoff with Warner is immobility but a much more accurate arm and quick release and the ability to stretch the field with Galloway.

naplesbuc

*****
Pro Bowler

Posts : 1235
Offline
« #11 : December 04, 2006, 02:01:51 PM »
Chances are the Raiders will have the top pick and take Quinn.  Another rookie next year means more losing.  Of any of the potential rookies I'd take Troy Smith because he will adapt to the pro game the quickest.

CadillacPower24_2006

*
Practice Squad

Posts : 0
Offline
« #12 : December 04, 2006, 01:59:06 PM »
Brady Quinn but then that mean you got another rookie....we may be in trouble here scratch that, we are in trouble

Mohawkbucs

****
Starter

Posts : 989
Offline
« #13 : December 04, 2006, 02:01:09 PM »
we are in trouble, one of the best options imo is Plummer, better than Warner

coqui4

**
Rookie

Posts : 75
Offline
« #14 : December 04, 2006, 01:37:18 PM »
Forget it! Warner! What for? So he can stand back there take sacks, fumble, and throw interceptions. I mean i know we got that now with our current offense and quarterback, but I'm pretty sure bringing in Warner would make this team worst, somehow.
  Page: 1 2
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: Kurt Warner « previous next »
:  

Copyright © 2010 Pewter Report, PewterReport.com and Pewter Insider. All Rights Reserved.
Hide Tools Show Tools