Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: Cvillebucfan on March 19, 2008, 06:00:19 PMThat is an AMAZING 40 time for a guy that has the size of Sweed. If he didn't get hurt in 2007 this guy would possibly all over the top 10 in this draft. i'm skeptical. this guy was in the 4.5s at the combine. i still say he no different from the stable of big possesion guys we already have on the roster.
That is an AMAZING 40 time for a guy that has the size of Sweed. If he didn't get hurt in 2007 this guy would possibly all over the top 10 in this draft.
Quote from: RPC on March 19, 2008, 06:58:10 PMQuote from: Cvillebucfan on March 19, 2008, 06:00:19 PMThat is an AMAZING 40 time for a guy that has the size of Sweed. If he didn't get hurt in 2007 this guy would possibly all over the top 10 in this draft. i'm skeptical. this guy was in the 4.5s at the combine. i still say he no different from the stable of big possesion guys we already have on the roster. Gotta agree with ya RPC.
Quote from: RPC on March 19, 2008, 06:58:10 PMQuote from: Cvillebucfan on March 19, 2008, 06:00:19 PMThat is an AMAZING 40 time for a guy that has the size of Sweed. If he didn't get hurt in 2007 this guy would possibly all over the top 10 in this draft. i'm skeptical. this guy was in the 4.5s at the combine. i still say he no different from the stable of big possesion guys we already have on the roster. add me too RPC....(out of curiosity what were Stovall's times and test's and that matter Clayton's)....it's always interesting to watch the gleam of pre-draft frenzy and some deju vu moments when it comes to the new class.... add in with him coming off the injury too and it seems like we would repeat our WR mold...jmho
Here's another source who disagrees with the 4.40 time reported in Texas:"Sweed (6-4�, 210): Ran the 40 in 4.50 and 4.51, had a 37 �-inch vertical jump, 10-foot, 8-inch long jump, 4.33 short shuttle, 7.14 cone drill, ran position drills and looked good catching the ball."
Well if that is what is being said, that is what is being said. I saw him run a 4.48 at the combine. That is fantastic for a guy of his size.
Quote from: Cvillebucfan on March 19, 2008, 11:09:40 PMWell if that is what is being said, that is what is being said. I saw him run a 4.48 at the combine. That is fantastic for a guy of his size. One report says 4.40 today, another says 4.50. Either way, it's pretty fast for his size. Clayton ran 4.45 at the combine, but he was 30 pounds lighter than Sweed.
Michael Clayton? This is what this site had, but you know how that goes... http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/profile.php?pyid=26906
Quote from: Cvillebucfan on March 19, 2008, 11:22:42 PMMichael Clayton? This is what this site had, but you know how that goes... http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/profile.php?pyid=26906I'd think that's accurate. The 4.45 didn't seem right to me.
He also posted a 38 inch vertical which would have been a half an inch shorter than the high at the combine for WR's (Kenaan Burton).
Quote from: Cvillebucfan on March 19, 2008, 08:45:28 PMHe also posted a 38 inch vertical which would have been a half an inch shorter than the high at the combine for WR's (Kenaan Burton).I really don't understand why more people don't talk about Keenan Burton.