Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: H-D-E on December 07, 2006, 01:25:02 PMQuote from: M~J~S on December 07, 2006, 01:03:23 PMI like Leonard a lot, and I have pimped him quite a bit.  He would be a great addition has a FB, and RB, plus he has soft hands. Caddy misses having a guy of Brown's caliber in the back-field and Leonard would be a huge boost for our running game.I would take in at the top of the 2nd if there was a chance he will go elsewhere before our late second round pick.Top of the 2nd? hmmmmScary isn't it! Just think Leoanrd with our 1st 2nd rd pick, yikes!!!!!!!! Scary thought!
Quote from: M~J~S on December 07, 2006, 01:03:23 PMI like Leonard a lot, and I have pimped him quite a bit.  He would be a great addition has a FB, and RB, plus he has soft hands. Caddy misses having a guy of Brown's caliber in the back-field and Leonard would be a huge boost for our running game.I would take in at the top of the 2nd if there was a chance he will go elsewhere before our late second round pick.Top of the 2nd? hmmmm
I like Leonard a lot, and I have pimped him quite a bit.  He would be a great addition has a FB, and RB, plus he has soft hands. Caddy misses having a guy of Brown's caliber in the back-field and Leonard would be a huge boost for our running game.I would take in at the top of the 2nd if there was a chance he will go elsewhere before our late second round pick.
There have been FBs that have gone in the second round in the past, our very own A-Train was the 35th pick. People get far to tied up in draft position and value, remember a large number of 2nd round picks will be flipping burger a few years after draft day. If you can draft a sure fire starter in the 2nd round then it isn’t a wasted pick. I would rather spend a 3rd round on Leonard but if the FO want him and they know someone else is targeting him in the 2nd round then they have to make a tough decision.
Personally, I think people are too focused on getting "the next Alstott". It'd be groovy and all, but I really think it would be a luxury for the team at this point. If we need a compliment for Caddy, we should be able to find a perfectly serviceable one in the mid-rounds, not a high second.
We'd get more value using a 5th on the best real FB in the draft becuase that guy'd make Caddy look many times better than another Alstott RB/FB hybrid.l
Quote from: Cvillebucfan on December 07, 2006, 01:28:12 PMQuote from: H-D-E on December 07, 2006, 01:25:02 PMQuote from: M~J~S on December 07, 2006, 01:03:23 PMI like Leonard a lot, and I have pimped him quite a bit. He would be a great addition has a FB, and RB, plus he has soft hands. Caddy misses having a guy of Brown's caliber in the back-field and Leonard would be a huge boost for our running game.I would take in at the top of the 2nd if there was a chance he will go elsewhere before our late second round pick.Top of the 2nd? hmmmmScary isn't it! Just think Leoanrd with our 1st 2nd rd pick, yikes!!!!!!!! Scary thought! There have been FBs that have gone in the second round in the past.
Quote from: H-D-E on December 07, 2006, 01:25:02 PMQuote from: M~J~S on December 07, 2006, 01:03:23 PMI like Leonard a lot, and I have pimped him quite a bit. He would be a great addition has a FB, and RB, plus he has soft hands. Caddy misses having a guy of Brown's caliber in the back-field and Leonard would be a huge boost for our running game.I would take in at the top of the 2nd if there was a chance he will go elsewhere before our late second round pick.Top of the 2nd? hmmmmScary isn't it! Just think Leoanrd with our 1st 2nd rd pick, yikes!!!!!!!! Scary thought!
Quote from: M~J~S on December 07, 2006, 01:03:23 PMI like Leonard a lot, and I have pimped him quite a bit. He would be a great addition has a FB, and RB, plus he has soft hands. Caddy misses having a guy of Brown's caliber in the back-field and Leonard would be a huge boost for our running game.I would take in at the top of the 2nd if there was a chance he will go elsewhere before our late second round pick.Top of the 2nd? hmmmm
I like Leonard a lot, and I have pimped him quite a bit. He would be a great addition has a FB, and RB, plus he has soft hands. Caddy misses having a guy of Brown's caliber in the back-field and Leonard would be a huge boost for our running game.I would take in at the top of the 2nd if there was a chance he will go elsewhere before our late second round pick.
Leonard is a guy who isn't anything. He's not a FB and he's not a RB. Why would you want to burn a premium pick on a postion that doesn't need a premium pick (FB) or on a backup HB? Frankly, I'm not even sure the guy has a role in the NFL. There are better players to be had at more valuable positions.
Personally, I think people are too focused on getting "the next Alstott". It'd be groovy and all, but I really think it would be a luxury for the team at this point. If we need a compliment for Caddy, we should be able to find a perfectly serviceable one in the mid-rounds, not a high second.
Quote from: Acacius on December 07, 2006, 02:14:02 PMPersonally, I think people are too focused on getting "the next Alstott". Â It'd be groovy and all, but I really think it would be a luxury for the team at this point. Â If we need a compliment for Caddy, we should be able to find a perfectly serviceable one in the mid-rounds, not a high second.I don't think that Leonard is the next Alsttot. Â I do think:1) That he can be a good lead blocker (and thus, a true FB).2) That he can add a dimension to the offense that would be incredibly useful when plays break down.
Personally, I think people are too focused on getting "the next Alstott". Â It'd be groovy and all, but I really think it would be a luxury for the team at this point. Â If we need a compliment for Caddy, we should be able to find a perfectly serviceable one in the mid-rounds, not a high second.
I haven't seen a lot of Rutgers, only bits here and there. Saw him catching the ball well and a few tough runs, but how's his blocking?