Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: BucsnNoles on May 20, 2008, 02:05:30 PMQuote from: Iron Gunwalls on May 20, 2008, 01:32:35 PMNot to mention Jake Plummer is just 33 years old and has atleast 5 more years left in the tank. So it was a great trade and your saying that "history has shown us that our FO likes to trade for QB's that are going to retire and don't want to play for us" is quite rediculous considering we've been around for 33 years and traded once FOR a QB that chose retirement instead of continuing his NFL career with us.It may not be ignornace but something else is surely blinding you.The current FO has been around for 33 years? You guys are funny.Funny? Notice the quote I used from your post? You didn't say current. You said our FO has a history...not our current FO has a history.
Quote from: Iron Gunwalls on May 20, 2008, 01:32:35 PMNot to mention Jake Plummer is just 33 years old and has atleast 5 more years left in the tank. So it was a great trade and your saying that "history has shown us that our FO likes to trade for QB's that are going to retire and don't want to play for us" is quite rediculous considering we've been around for 33 years and traded once FOR a QB that chose retirement instead of continuing his NFL career with us.It may not be ignornace but something else is surely blinding you.The current FO has been around for 33 years? You guys are funny.
Not to mention Jake Plummer is just 33 years old and has atleast 5 more years left in the tank. So it was a great trade and your saying that "history has shown us that our FO likes to trade for QB's that are going to retire and don't want to play for us" is quite rediculous considering we've been around for 33 years and traded once FOR a QB that chose retirement instead of continuing his NFL career with us.It may not be ignornace but something else is surely blinding you.
Quote from: BucsnNoles on May 20, 2008, 02:04:16 PMQuote from: LeeroyBuc on May 20, 2008, 01:58:01 PMQuote from: BucsnNoles on May 20, 2008, 01:53:45 PMQuote from: LeeroyBuc on May 20, 2008, 01:17:59 PMYou stated that is was likely and that it wasn't unlikely. Neither are facts and are the basis for your entire post. This is the single dumbest post I've seen in a very long time. Apparently you don't have the best comprehension skills. When someone says, "I think......." that doesn't mean that they are stating it as a fact.Well let's see...QuoteShowing my ignorance, huh? Look at the facts, huh? What did I state that wasn't fact? The Bucs always go into camp with a big stable of QB. I didn't say that the Bucs would keep them all on the 53 man roster. And, yes, 4 QB's is a little much to have on the 53 man roster.Apparently you can't understand your own words. The entire basis of your post is based on what you think, so why are you asking us to look at the facts? There are none! Thanks for making my point for me. That was too easy!HA!We both know that you're the one that brought up "facts", sweety. Now just log off and leave the football talk to the men.Hahaha! I haven't got someone to give up that fast in years! Glad to see one more noob on the board that I can crush in less than 5 posts.
Quote from: LeeroyBuc on May 20, 2008, 01:58:01 PMQuote from: BucsnNoles on May 20, 2008, 01:53:45 PMQuote from: LeeroyBuc on May 20, 2008, 01:17:59 PMYou stated that is was likely and that it wasn't unlikely. Neither are facts and are the basis for your entire post. This is the single dumbest post I've seen in a very long time. Apparently you don't have the best comprehension skills. When someone says, "I think......." that doesn't mean that they are stating it as a fact.Well let's see...QuoteShowing my ignorance, huh? Look at the facts, huh? What did I state that wasn't fact? The Bucs always go into camp with a big stable of QB. I didn't say that the Bucs would keep them all on the 53 man roster. And, yes, 4 QB's is a little much to have on the 53 man roster.Apparently you can't understand your own words. The entire basis of your post is based on what you think, so why are you asking us to look at the facts? There are none! Thanks for making my point for me. That was too easy!HA!We both know that you're the one that brought up "facts", sweety. Now just log off and leave the football talk to the men.
Quote from: BucsnNoles on May 20, 2008, 01:53:45 PMQuote from: LeeroyBuc on May 20, 2008, 01:17:59 PMYou stated that is was likely and that it wasn't unlikely. Neither are facts and are the basis for your entire post. This is the single dumbest post I've seen in a very long time. Apparently you don't have the best comprehension skills. When someone says, "I think......." that doesn't mean that they are stating it as a fact.Well let's see...QuoteShowing my ignorance, huh? Look at the facts, huh? What did I state that wasn't fact? The Bucs always go into camp with a big stable of QB. I didn't say that the Bucs would keep them all on the 53 man roster. And, yes, 4 QB's is a little much to have on the 53 man roster.Apparently you can't understand your own words. The entire basis of your post is based on what you think, so why are you asking us to look at the facts? There are none! Thanks for making my point for me. That was too easy!
Quote from: LeeroyBuc on May 20, 2008, 01:17:59 PMYou stated that is was likely and that it wasn't unlikely. Neither are facts and are the basis for your entire post. This is the single dumbest post I've seen in a very long time. Apparently you don't have the best comprehension skills. When someone says, "I think......." that doesn't mean that they are stating it as a fact.
You stated that is was likely and that it wasn't unlikely. Neither are facts and are the basis for your entire post. This is the single dumbest post I've seen in a very long time.
Showing my ignorance, huh? Look at the facts, huh? What did I state that wasn't fact? The Bucs always go into camp with a big stable of QB. I didn't say that the Bucs would keep them all on the 53 man roster. And, yes, 4 QB's is a little much to have on the 53 man roster.
Quote from: LeeroyBuc on May 20, 2008, 02:11:43 PMQuote from: BucsnNoles on May 20, 2008, 02:04:16 PMQuote from: LeeroyBuc on May 20, 2008, 01:58:01 PMQuote from: BucsnNoles on May 20, 2008, 01:53:45 PMQuote from: LeeroyBuc on May 20, 2008, 01:17:59 PMYou stated that is was likely and that it wasn't unlikely. Neither are facts and are the basis for your entire post. This is the single dumbest post I've seen in a very long time. Apparently you don't have the best comprehension skills. When someone says, "I think......." that doesn't mean that they are stating it as a fact.Well let's see...QuoteShowing my ignorance, huh? Look at the facts, huh? What did I state that wasn't fact? The Bucs always go into camp with a big stable of QB. I didn't say that the Bucs would keep them all on the 53 man roster. And, yes, 4 QB's is a little much to have on the 53 man roster.Apparently you can't understand your own words. The entire basis of your post is based on what you think, so why are you asking us to look at the facts? There are none! Thanks for making my point for me. That was too easy!HA!We both know that you're the one that brought up "facts", sweety. Now just log off and leave the football talk to the men.Hahaha! I haven't got someone to give up that fast in years! Glad to see one more noob on the board that I can crush in less than 5 posts. Deflection noted.
What can 7 mil do to help the Bucs organization. Well for starters they could use the money to build a Buc HOF building or ring of honor. They could use the money to buy more training equipment. Hell they could use the money to blow their nose for all I care. How many 7th round picks make the team in any given year? Not many even if you consider the entire NFL. Add the fact that the FO was able to trade down in the draft and get a 7th round pick anyway and what did we lose? Con on man you can make a better argument for why the FO and Gruden is a joke then this. This isn't even worth fighting about anymore, you are just making yourself look like a fool.
Says the guy whose post lead to that one. This is like arguing with a toddler who's too dumb to know when he's lost!
F-N-G
Quote from: LeeroyBuc on May 20, 2008, 02:16:44 PMSays the guy whose post lead to that one. This is like arguing with a toddler who's too dumb to know when he's lost! You're not keeping up there, sweety. It's quite obvious that you can't debate football with the grown adults.
Why does it matter if the teams had them on the roster all at once? Would you rather the team only have 3 QBs on the roster and if a fourth is needed sign Testeverde? Thanks for deflecting the facts even when they are presented to you clearly. Maybe you should go write for the Trip or Times hell they might even give you a few hours on 620. As I asked and stated before and you ignored what does the 50-53rd man on the roster do to help the team? How many games did Buenning and Roland (spent 2 games on the roster both inactive) were both on the roster at some point during the season and never saw action. There are players in every game that do not see the field what is wrong with having an extra QB on the roster instead of Buenning last season?
Quote from: BucsnNoles on May 20, 2008, 02:22:40 PMQuote from: LeeroyBuc on May 20, 2008, 02:16:44 PMSays the guy whose post lead to that one. This is like arguing with a toddler who's too dumb to know when he's lost! You're not keeping up there, sweety. It's quite obvious that you can't debate football with the grown adults.Let's go back through the threads here and see who stopped talking football first. The premise to this thread is ridiculous and when it is clearly pointed out to you you call me "sweety" and tell me to log off. That's anti-logic 101. When you lose an argument, act like you won and maybe everyone else will believe you. That's not going to cut it on this board. Get up to speed quick or maybe think about reading the board a little before you decide to post. If you'd done that you'd know this thread isn't up to par. I will leave you to that now and hope in the future your posts are not such... well let's just hope they're better.