Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Galloway is better than Welker, that's all you need to know.
Quote from: TBayXXXVII on June 30, 2008, 11:55:40 AMGalloway is better than Welker, that's all you need to know.You're a homer wearing Pewter colored glasses, that all you need to know.
Quote from: Cheveliar on June 30, 2008, 12:12:41 AMQuote from: ABuccsFan on June 29, 2008, 11:38:17 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on June 29, 2008, 10:09:31 PMI think Galloway is more valuable than Welker because Galloway is a true #1 receiver you can build a passing offense around. If Welker was your #1 receiver you'd be in serious trouble. However, Welker is better at being a #2 receiver than Galloway is at being a #1 receiver, if that makes any sense. Build a passing offense around? Are you serious? He's 38 freaking years old!!!know anybody in the league that old or younger that gets his kind of separation? Hey he's old but I'll take his old before most of the starting receivers in this league. Joey is the least of our worries. Ike is the guy that someone needs to beat out to make this WR corps special...And when I say you can build a passing offense around Galloway, I'm speaking over the sum of his career, not right now at this moment.
Quote from: ABuccsFan on June 29, 2008, 11:38:17 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on June 29, 2008, 10:09:31 PMI think Galloway is more valuable than Welker because Galloway is a true #1 receiver you can build a passing offense around. If Welker was your #1 receiver you'd be in serious trouble. However, Welker is better at being a #2 receiver than Galloway is at being a #1 receiver, if that makes any sense. Build a passing offense around? Are you serious? He's 38 freaking years old!!!know anybody in the league that old or younger that gets his kind of separation? Hey he's old but I'll take his old before most of the starting receivers in this league. Joey is the least of our worries. Ike is the guy that someone needs to beat out to make this WR corps special...
Quote from: Feel Real Good on June 29, 2008, 10:09:31 PMI think Galloway is more valuable than Welker because Galloway is a true #1 receiver you can build a passing offense around. If Welker was your #1 receiver you'd be in serious trouble. However, Welker is better at being a #2 receiver than Galloway is at being a #1 receiver, if that makes any sense. Build a passing offense around? Are you serious? He's 38 freaking years old!!!
I think Galloway is more valuable than Welker because Galloway is a true #1 receiver you can build a passing offense around. If Welker was your #1 receiver you'd be in serious trouble. However, Welker is better at being a #2 receiver than Galloway is at being a #1 receiver, if that makes any sense.
Would the Pats have given up a 2nd for Galloway? Doubt it.