Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: watson on December 19, 2006, 06:42:46 PMPer the topic, here are my FAs:Jeff Garcia; Veteran WCO QB that can come in and be the starter as well as tutor for either Gradkowski or Simms if he re-signs or whoever they bring in via the draft Lance Briggs: He is well versed in the Tampa 2 and has the speed that 55 used to have. Winborn is apparently well thought of by Kiffin the the other defensive coaches, but Briggs is a huge upgrade.Nate Clements: Don't know if BK will recover from the foot problem and Clements is younger with good coverage skillsBucs to re-sign:White: Valuable swing player that can play either end positionBuchannon: Has shown that he is not afraid to tackle and his coverage skills are still very good Brad,There was something that I think it was Ronde or Quarles said on their show recently about Zemaitis still learning and having to overcome some issues. Not sure what it was, but if he does that, I agree that corner may not be an issue. I like what I have seen of Buchannon so far. I know that he got a bit of a downgrade last week in the after game grades versus what he got against the Falcons, but what I saw it looked like the CBs were slipping alot on the turf. I think he had the play diagnosed, but just couldn't keep his footing.With Buchanon exceeding expectations and Zemaitis having a full season under his belt, is CB such a concern that we need a high $$ CB like Clements?
Per the topic, here are my FAs:Jeff Garcia; Veteran WCO QB that can come in and be the starter as well as tutor for either Gradkowski or Simms if he re-signs or whoever they bring in via the draft Lance Briggs: He is well versed in the Tampa 2 and has the speed that 55 used to have. Winborn is apparently well thought of by Kiffin the the other defensive coaches, but Briggs is a huge upgrade.Nate Clements: Don't know if BK will recover from the foot problem and Clements is younger with good coverage skillsBucs to re-sign:White: Valuable swing player that can play either end positionBuchannon: Has shown that he is not afraid to tackle and his coverage skills are still very good
Beyond that we need an upgrade at LT over Davis for sure, he is a right tackle at best. Jeff Baccus from detroit would be an upgrade.
First, they must resign Simms. Even if we add Garcia (which is definitely a good idea) too much has been invested to let Simms promise leave as he is on the cusp. But durability is a problem. I say, Simms #1, Garcia #1a, Gradowski/McCown 3/4(cut), Rattay is outta here on jan 1.
If the money is right, Simms will resign.
Garcia will leave Philly b/c they won't pay him. The best he will get is $$ and a chance to compete. I don't think any team in the league will sign him as a sure-fire starter. His market will be teams with potenital but uncertainty at the position.
First, they must resign Simms.
I think it is a sure fire certainty that the Eagles will offer him a very attracive back-up contract with McNabb coming back from injury.
Quote from: dalbuc on December 19, 2006, 03:29:36 PMReally? That's interesting. I see him about every 3rd game (roughly) if he's in a game next to the game I'm watching so I don't get a lot of good looks at him. What do you see in him that upgrades over our Davis?I'm not saying its a huge upgrade, but he's got more size than AD and I think the Cardinals were wrong to have him play OG and I can't fault him for his poor play inside versus his normal comfort area playing outside. He seems to be a more natural OT to me, and he's the only guy on the AZ line who has been able to hold down his position. Watching him play both inside and out, I like him working in space where he can get a solid base and turn guys outside as necessary. I think his feet are a little quicker than AD's, and I'd have to guess he's stronger, too. And he did make the ProBowl as an alternate, so there's some sense he's pretty good at the OT position around the league.I think if you can sign LD for the right money, AD suddenly becomes a very valuable guy to you as a swing tackle.
Really? That's interesting. I see him about every 3rd game (roughly) if he's in a game next to the game I'm watching so I don't get a lot of good looks at him. What do you see in him that upgrades over our Davis?
Quote from: DanTurksGhost on December 19, 2006, 03:59:27 PMQuote from: dalbuc on December 19, 2006, 03:29:36 PMReally? That's interesting. I see him about every 3rd game (roughly) if he's in a game next to the game I'm watching so I don't get a lot of good looks at him. What do you see in him that upgrades over our Davis?I'm not saying its a huge upgrade, but he's got more size than AD and I think the Cardinals were wrong to have him play OG and I can't fault him for his poor play inside versus his normal comfort area playing outside. He seems to be a more natural OT to me, and he's the only guy on the AZ line who has been able to hold down his position. Watching him play both inside and out, I like him working in space where he can get a solid base and turn guys outside as necessary. I think his feet are a little quicker than AD's, and I'd have to guess he's stronger, too. And he did make the ProBowl as an alternate, so there's some sense he's pretty good at the OT position around the league.I think if you can sign LD for the right money, AD suddenly becomes a very valuable guy to you as a swing tackle.While size does matter, it totally depends on the topic. Â In this instance I don't think it does. Â Yeah I'm the champion for the unheralded guy and you know that's where I'm going. Â AD is probably the most fiery guy we have on this oline. Â To include Buening. Ok so you bring in a LOT either draft or FA. Â Then you want to make AD your swing tackle? Â You think Trueblood, regardless of his draft status or play this year, is better than AD? Â Why not move him to ROT and make Trueblood the swing guy? Â Like him or not IMO, he's the only lineman we have with any kind of attitude...