Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
1.) Ian Gold didn't play for a head coach who used to work for the Bucs. 2.) The Bucs had no intention of him playing for more than that one year. He was coming off a major injury in which he only played 6 games in 2003. His contract was up and Denver wasn't sure they wanted to pay full price for damaged goods. So he signed a minimum deal to play an easy position for a loaded defense and show he was healthy again. When that season was over, the Bucs had no money to sign him and historically Sam linebacker has not been a position the Bucs spent much money on, so he went back to Denver and got a nice contract.
The point being, where he was a good fit in Denver, he wasn't so much here.
There have been quite a few hot free agents who switch teams and all of a sudden fall off the face of the earth.
And even if we had signed Briggs, we'd still have probably drafted Hayes for depth.. so we'd be faced with 30 threads crying about how dumb it was to waste huge money on Briggs, threads demanding Briggs be traded for xxx and a lot of overall whinning about the front office's poor free agency/draft moves.
Quote from: Magnaccia on September 26, 2008, 10:25:10 AMThe point being, where he was a good fit in Denver, he wasn't so much here.I still maintain, as does bucjoe, that Gold was a fine fit in Tampa. Quote from: Magnaccia on September 26, 2008, 10:25:10 AMThere have been quite a few hot free agents who switch teams and all of a sudden fall off the face of the earth. I don't believe Gold was one of them. Quote from: Magnaccia on September 26, 2008, 10:25:10 AMAnd even if we had signed Briggs, we'd still have probably drafted Hayes for depth.. so we'd be faced with 30 threads crying about how dumb it was to waste huge money on Briggs, threads demanding Briggs be traded for xxx and a lot of overall whinning about the front office's poor free agency/draft moves. I never said the Bucs should have signed Briggs; I just disagreed that he wouldn't have been a good fit.
Signing Briggs would be a cap disaster.
Quote from: Runole on September 26, 2008, 10:53:59 AMSigning Briggs would be a cap disaster.The Bucs have so much cap room it's ridiculous. They could have afforded him if they wanted to.
Are you sure about that?� � There are a lot of young players that will be due a raise soon as well as some veterans.
Listening to Allen I believe you might be in error in thinking Briggs price would be a good deal.
I think you are correct though IF THEY WANTED TO.. Obviously they don't.
I admit I was hot on Briggs at one time.� Not so sure he would be that great a fit here.