Welcome, Guest
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: The case for drafting AD Peterson « previous next »
Page: 1 ... 27 28 29



Guest
#420 : March 21, 2009, 07:30:03 PM

Matt Forte? Im confused. You mean the same Matt Forte than had 1700 yards and 12 TDs last year as a rookie?
You are correct Forte has better hands and a nose for the end zone, but my point is running backs who put up Carnell 2005 numbers come along every year, and you don't need top 5 picks to get them.

Matt Forte is a prime example of why i laugh when people throw out the "Carnell was ROY". Forte put up much better #s and I don't know if he was even in the running.

dmajik85

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 4295
Offline
#421 : March 21, 2009, 09:52:00 PM

RoY is completely subjective... when Caddy won it, it was pretty clear cut cause no one else was that effective. Forte (and Slaton even) were highly productive, but there were two QB who took their teams to the playoffs.

ALong13

*
Pro Bowler
*****
Posts : 1739
Offline
#422 : March 22, 2009, 02:26:06 PM

Did we seriously have to bring this thread back? This thread is months old, could have just left it...


Biggs3535

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 31562
Online
#423 : March 22, 2009, 02:45:18 PM

Why did you waste your time replying and bumping it again?

Go visit one of the countless Cutler threads or the threads making fun of the Cutler threads or the threads making fun of the threads making fun of the Cutler threads.

Page: 1 ... 27 28 29
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: The case for drafting AD Peterson « previous next »
:

Hide Tools Show Tools