Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Grudens arrogance may finally cost him.  The Bennet cut was absolutely assinine.
Quote from: BuccanAy on November 17, 2008, 11:31:19 AMGrudens arrogance may finally cost him. The Bennet cut was absolutely assinine.The Bennett manlove on this board is absolutely assinine.
Grudens arrogance may finally cost him. The Bennet cut was absolutely assinine.
The bottom line, imo, is that he'd managed to work himself behind Clifton Smith on the depth chart.  If the team takes a turn for the worse, I'm just wholly skeptical that cutting Bennett will have been a major factor in it.
Why do you cut a healthy RB who's shown the ability to be a playmaking RB, a veteran who's spent the offseason learining the playbook, who performed well in TC(I was there and saw it)and a RB who performed well in PS?  Especially when your feature back is hurting, the next guy has a ton of miles on him and is also hurting.  This was a VERY bad decision, I don't think you can debate it wasn't, and be honest about it.
This was a VERY bad decision, I don't think you can debate it wasn't, and be honest about it.
Quote from: BucWildFan on November 17, 2008, 11:19:40 AMWhen graham started yesterday, was he at 100% or rushed from the injury? I would've preferred to see cadillac if EG wasn't at 100%.Graham wasn't 100% and I believe that he was rushed back into the lineup. If you sustain an injury the likelyhood of worsening the injury or indirectly causing another new injury on another portion of the body exponentialy increases.But expect many to dispute this.
When graham started yesterday, was he at 100% or rushed from the injury? I would've preferred to see cadillac if EG wasn't at 100%.
The team clearly didnt think the guy was worth a crap. He had a undrafted rookie ahead of him on the depth chart. Hes sitting as a third again in SD isnt he?
I am not buying the argument that Smith was higher than Bennett on the depth chart because he was better, experienced running back.  Only reason is that he has value as a returner.  That's it.
Quote from: All_da_way on November 17, 2008, 11:48:15 AMI am not buying the argument that Smith was higher than Bennett on the depth chart because he was better, experienced running back.  Only reason is that he has value as a returner.  That's it. Bennett's being unable or unwilling to contribute on special teams isn't exactly to his credit either.  If he were REALLY all that and a bag of chips, you'd think he'd have been able to find a way to help out there, especially once Jackson was pulled.