Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
I havent even got into any of the Garcia talk around here this week, or bothered to read any of the threads, because it was OBVIOUS that the reason he was having errandt throws because of the rain. He still has something like a top 3 completion %, the least INTs and one of the best QB ratings in the league. It isn't even worth discussing, when the argument the haters are using is 1 poor game passing in the rain
Quote from: Badabing on December 02, 2008, 10:05:47 PMGarcia didn't have his best of days, but he wasn't absolutely horrid. He did keep some drives alive with his legs and did toss a TD pass which everyone values so much around here. He is 6-1 since retaking the starting gig and its not like they are winning inspite of him like they were with Griese.Hate, you may not think Garcia is good, but he does contribute to many of our wins and we wouldn't be 9-3 without him."BADABING!"
Garcia didn't have his best of days, but he wasn't absolutely horrid. He did keep some drives alive with his legs and did toss a TD pass which everyone values so much around here. He is 6-1 since retaking the starting gig and its not like they are winning inspite of him like they were with Griese.Hate, you may not think Garcia is good, but he does contribute to many of our wins and we wouldn't be 9-3 without him.
TD% and YPA avg is DIRECTLY due to the offense he plays in, and Im okay with that. How could you argue it any different?
Quote from: cyberdude557 on December 03, 2008, 01:21:43 AMFunny when you go to message boards of opposing fans...Jeff Garcia is the guy on the offense that is most feared.Its really easy to understand, 94.6 QB rating last year and 92.5 QB rating this year. They cant back up anythign they say about Garcia, jsut a lot of hollow accusatioons with no follow up if you call them out on thier B.S.
Funny when you go to message boards of opposing fans...Jeff Garcia is the guy on the offense that is most feared.
Quote from: cyberdude557 on December 02, 2008, 10:58:02 PMAs Brad Johnson proved in 2002...you dont have to be good. You just have to be good enough. Right now, Garcia is good enough.2002 Brad Johnson was a gazillion times better than 2007-2008 Jeff Garcia.
As Brad Johnson proved in 2002...you dont have to be good. You just have to be good enough. Right now, Garcia is good enough.
Quote from: michael89156 on December 02, 2008, 09:56:38 PMOn a day when Jeff Garcia was a non-factor, this was classic Buc Ball.Some folks will not take kindly to that statement however I like Schein and enjoyed the article.
On a day when Jeff Garcia was a non-factor, this was classic Buc Ball.
Quote from: bradentonian on December 03, 2008, 01:37:44 AMWhere did I champion Griese? He's a turd that we never should have traded for. Using him as a benchmark for Garcia doesn't prove anything.Why is it that you and Sammy make statements, I argue against them, and then you completely forget what I was responding to? Its baffling...QuoteGruden QBs always have higher QB ratings because of the high % check-downs and stress on avoiding turnoversI gave you prime examples of how Gruden's offense doesnt just pump out QB ratings in the 90s as easy as you make it out to be.
Where did I champion Griese? He's a turd that we never should have traded for. Using him as a benchmark for Garcia doesn't prove anything.
Gruden QBs always have higher QB ratings because of the high % check-downs and stress on avoiding turnovers
Where did I champion Griese? He's a turd that we never should have traded for. Using him as a benchmark for Garcia doesn't prove anything.
Quote from: bradentonian on December 03, 2008, 01:27:23 AMGruden QBs always have higher QB ratings because of the high % check-downs and stress on avoiding turnoversGriese's QB rating in his last 10 games for gruden is 20 points lower  than Garcias. T-W-E-N-T-YNot only does Garcia have the highest QB rating in franchise history, it is higher under Gruden than Brad Johnson's ever was in any year under Gruden. His Super bOwl year is comparable, then in 2003 his QB rating was 81.5 and the following year it was 79 before being benched.How could someone who watched Gradkowski play in 2006 act as if having a QB rating in teh 90s is some easy task? Grads ahad a 65.9 rating and proved that just "dumping the ball off" and having a high QB rating is no easy taskHe deserves his due credit for being a solid starting QB in this league