Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Agreed that the first play didn't bother me as much as the 3rd down play. It should have been a Caddy run
On third down the play-fake was weak but it did suck in Beason and Diggs. Smith was open in the middle of the endzone in between the zone but as we know Garcia can't see over the line, so he didn't see him. Everything else is pretty well covered, whether he goes right or not, and seeing as Brayton had penetration on the right anyway I don't see how rolling that way would have helped. As he rolls left he has Stevens open for about a second, but it would have been a tough throw and catch (although Stevens has shown he can make that tough catch). All in all it was pretty well defended. The best chance on that pay might have been to hit Askew in the flat. Even though there was at least one man between him and the endzone, Askew isn't easy to tackle and might have bulled his way in. Coulda shoulda woulda. It's over now so maybe this thread will be the last of it.
Quote from: keeponbucn on December 11, 2008, 01:01:42 PMAgreed that the first play didn't bother me as much as the 3rd down play. It should have been a Caddy runShoulda coulda woulda. The play may have worked, we'll never know. Gilmore was wide freaking open at exactly the same time Garica panicked and vacated left. I will go on record as stating I think Gruden called a good play there, and maybe a different style(I won't say better, can of worms still closed) QB may have made the difference. I wouldn't have been opposed to a run call there, but this play design worked, Gilmore was drooling for the pass.
Quote from: jeanclaudtransam on December 11, 2008, 01:07:52 PMOn third down the play-fake was weak but it did suck in Beason and Diggs. Smith was open in the middle of the endzone in between the zone but as we know Garcia can't see over the line, so he didn't see him. Everything else is pretty well covered, whether he goes right or not, and seeing as Brayton had penetration on the right anyway I don't see how rolling that way would have helped. As he rolls left he has Stevens open for about a second, but it would have been a tough throw and catch (although Stevens has shown he can make that tough catch). All in all it was pretty well defended. The best chance on that pay might have been to hit Askew in the flat. Even though there was at least one man between him and the endzone, Askew isn't easy to tackle and might have bulled his way in. Coulda shoulda woulda. It's over now so maybe this thread will be the last of it.Re-watch it again. Gilmore was wide open, before the pressure came. Watch it from the camera angle that hovers above the field during ESPN's replay. Stevens may have been open for a second, but with Garcia running to his left, he wasn't ready to throw the ball until he turned his shoulders, and by then Stevens wasn't open. The fact remains, by running left, he took 3 of his possible 4 targets away.
Smith was open
Quote from: olafberserker on December 11, 2008, 02:05:18 PMSmith was open Wrong!!!! Mistaken!! Fallacy!! Misunderstanding!!